Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제77권5호
  • /
  • Pages.661-672
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modifications to fire resistance ratings of steel frames based on structural configuration: A probabilistic-based approach

  • Behnam, Behrouz (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.05
  • 심사 : 2021.01.05
  • 발행 : 2021.03.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this article, the role of spans number and length in fire-resistance ratings (FRRs) of fireproofed steel frames are investigated. First, over a span-lengthening scenario, two one- and three-bay frames under the ISO834 fire are examined. It is shown that the FRRs of the frames rely highly on the changes made on their span length. Second, a building designed for three spans number of three, four, and five under natural fire is investigated. The beams are designed for two load-capacity-ratios (LCRs) of optimum and ultimate. The fire curves are determined through a probabilistic-based approach. It is shown that the structural vulnerability vastly increases while the number of spans decreases. The results show that for an optimum LCR, while the five-span frame can meet the required FRR in 87% of the fire scenarios, the four- and three-span frames can meet the required FRR in only 56%, and 50% of the fire scenarios, respectively. For an ultimate LCR, the five-, four- and three-span frames can meet the required FRR in 81%, 50%, and 37.5% of the fire scenarios, respectively. Functional solutions are then proposed to resolve the insufficiencies in the results and to rectify the application of the standard-based FRRs in the cases studied. The study here highlights how employing current standard-based FRRs can endanger structural safety if they are not connected to structural characteristics; a crucial hint specifically for the structural engineering community who may be not well familiar with the fundamentals of performance-based approaches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASTME119-01 (2001), Standard Methods of Fire Test of Building Construction and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
  2. Behnam, B. (2017), "Failure sensitivity analysis of tall moment-resisting structures under natural fires", Int. J. Civil Eng., 16(12), 1771-1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0248-x.
  3. Behnam, B. (2017), Post-Earthquake Fire Analysis in Urban Structures: Risk Management Strategies, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  4. Behnam, B. (2018), "Fire structural response of the plasco building: A preliminary investigation report", Int. J. Civil Eng., 17(5), 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0332-x.
  5. Bletzinger, K.U., Bischoff, M. and Ramm, E. (2000), "A unified approach for shear-locking-free triangular and rectangular shell finite elements", Comput. Struct., 75(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00140-6.
  6. Berengut, D. (2005), Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  7. Buchanan, A.H. (1994), "Fire engineering for a performance-based code", Fire Saf. J., 23(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(94)90058-2.
  8. EC8 (2005), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings,
  9. EN1991-1-2 (2002), Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures - Part 1-2: General actions-Actions on Structures Exposed to Fire, Brussels, Belgium CEN.
  10. Feasey, R. and Buchanan, A. (2002), "Post-flashover fires for structural design", Fire Saf. J., 37(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00026-1.
  11. Franssen, J.M. (2005), "SAFIR: A thermal/structural program for modeling structures under fire", Eng. J., 42(3), 143-150.
  12. Franssen, J.M. (2011), User's Manual for SAFIR 2011 a Computer Program for Analysis of Structures subjected to Fire, Liege, Belgium, University of Liege, Belgium.
  13. Fu, F. (2016), "3D finite element analysis of the whole-building behavior of tall building in fire", Adv. Comput. Des., 1(4), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2016.1.4.329.
  14. Gernay, T. and Franssen, J.M. (2015), "A performance indicator for structures under natural fire", Eng. Struct., 100, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.005.
  15. Gomes, V.R., Tenchini, A., Lima, L. and Vellasco, P. (2020), "Robustness assessment of semi-rigid steel multi-story frames", Struct., 25, 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.069.
  16. Hadjisophocleous, G.V., Benichou, N. and Tamim, A.S. (1998), "Literature review of performance-based fire codes and design environment", J. Fire Protect. Eng., 9(1), 12-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/104239159800900102.
  17. Irschik, H. (1991), "Analogy between refined beam theories and the Bernoulli-Euler theory", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 28(9), 1105-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(91)90105-O.
  18. ISO834 (1975), Fire Resistance Tests, Elements of Building Construction, Specific Requirements for the Assessment of Fire Protection to Structural Steel Eements, British Standards Institute.
  19. Kawagoe, K. and Sekine, T. (1963), "Estimation of fire temperature-time curve in rooms", Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japanese Government.
  20. Kenny, Q.Y. (2003), "Indicator function and its application in two-level factorial designs", Ann. Statist., 31(3), 984-994. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1056562470.
  21. Kodur, V., Ghani, B., Sultan, M., Lie, T. and El-Shayeb, M. (2001), "A model for evaluating the fire resistance of contour-protected steel columns", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(5), 559-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.5.559.
  22. Law, M. (1997). "A review of formulae for T-equivalent", Proceedings of Fifth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Melbourne Australia.
  23. Maia, E., Couto, C., Vila Real, P. and Lopes, N. (2016), "Critical temperatures of class 4 cross-sections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 121, 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.02.017.
  24. Maraveas, C., Gernay, T. and Franssen, J. (2018), "Sensitivity of elevated temperature load-carrying capacity of thin-walled steel members to local imperfections", Application of Fire Engineering, Eds. Gillie & Wang, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  25. Morbioli, A., Tondini, N. and Battini, J.M. (2018), "A branchswitching procedure for analyzing instability of steel structures subjected to fire", Struct. Eng. Mech., 67(6), 629-641. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2018.67.6.629
  26. Quiel, S. and Mem, G. (2008), "3-D versus 2-D modeling of a high-rise steel-framed building under fire", Fifth International Conference on Structures in Fire (SiF'08).
  27. Ryan, J.V. and Bender, E.W. (1954), "Fire endurance of open-web steel-joist floors with concrete slabs and gypsum ceilings", US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
  28. Torero, J.L. (2012), "Assessing the true performance of structures in fire", Performance-based and Life-cycle Structural Engineering Hong Kong, the University of Hong Kong.
  29. Torero, J.L. (2018), "Integrating fire dynamics into building design".