DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Basic Properties of Polymer Cement Mortar Using SBR Latex with Blast-Furnace and Fly Ash

폴리머 디스퍼전 SBR과 고로슬래그 미분말 및 플라이애시를 사용한 폴리머 시멘트 모르타르의 기초적 성질에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Wan-Ki (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hyupsung University) ;
  • Jo, Young-Kug (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungwoon University)
  • Received : 2020.10.31
  • Accepted : 2021.01.22
  • Published : 2021.02.20

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the improvement of flow, compressive and flexural strengths of polymer cement mortar(PCM) using SBR latex mixed with blast-furnace slag and fly ash. The test specimens were prepared with SBR polymer dispersion, two types of admixture (blast-furnace slag and fly ash), five polymer-cement ratios (P/C; 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%), and six admixture contents (0, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20%), plain cement mortar was also made for comparison. From the test results, the flow of PCM was significantly improved compared to ordinary cement mortar, but the flow was slightly reduced when mixed with blast-furnace slag, and the flow was similar to PCM when mixed with fly ash. In addition, the compressive strength of PCM mixed with admixtures was significantly improved, but the flexural strength did not improve except for some mortars. It can be stated that the optimum mix proportions of PCM using SBR with admixture contents 10 to 15% and P/C 10% for the compressive strength improvement, and P/C 20% for flexural strength improvement are recommended respectively in this study.

본 연구는 고로슬래그 미분말 및 플라이애시를 혼입한 PCM의 플로, 압축강도 및 휨강도 개선 정도를 평가하고자 하였다. 실험을 위한 공시체는 SBR 폴리머 디스퍼전, 혼화재료 2종류, P/C 5가지 (0, 5, 10, 15 및 20%), 혼화재 혼입률 6가지 (0, 3, 5, 10, 15 및 20%)로 변화시켜 PCM을 제작하였으며, 비교를 위하여 보통 시멘트 모르타르도 제작하였다. 본 연구결과, PCM의 플로는 보통 시멘트 모르타르에 비해 크게 개선되었으나, 고로슬래그를 혼입한 경우 플로가 약간 저하하였으며, 플라이애시를 혼입한 경우에는 PCM과 비슷한 경향을 보였다. 또한 혼화재를 혼입한 PCM의 압축강도는 상당히 개선되었으나, 휨강도는 일부를 제외하면 개선효과가 거의 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구에서 BF와 FA 혼입률 10%-15%의 SBR를 사용한 PCM의 압축강도 개선에는 P/C 10%, 휨강도의 개선을 위해서는 P/C 20%를 각각 최적 배합으로 제안할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ohama Y, Ibe H, Mine H, Kato K. Cement mortars modified by SB latexes with variable bound styrene. Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 1964 Feb;37(3):758-69. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3540369
  2. Ohama Y. Handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars. Noyes Publications. New Jersey (U.S.A); 1995. 225 p.
  3. Jo YK. Basic properties of polymer cement mortar with EVA emulsion and admixtures. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural maintenance and Inspection. 2019 Nov;23(6):53-60. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2019.23.6.53
  4. Kim MJ, Shin GO, Joo NC, Lee GJ,Jeong JP. Vibration properties of concrete overlays using RS-LMC. Journal of the Korea concrete Institute. 2016 Oct;28(5):571-9. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI. 2016. 28.5.571
  5. Choi KK. Numerical investigation on cracking of bridge desk slabs with latex modified concrete overlays. Journal of the Korea concrete Institute. 2010 Jan;22(1):77-84. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2010.22.1.077
  6. Piotrowski T. Prochon P. Capuana A. Mechanical properties of polymer cement-fiber-reinforced concrete (PC-FRC). Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Polymers in Concrete; 2018 Apr 29-May 1; Washington DC (USA). International Congress on Polymers in Concrete; 2018. p. 227-34.
  7. Jo YK. Kim WK. Investigation of physical properties and self healing of hardener-free epoxy-modified mortars with GGBFS. Journal of the institute for structural maintenance and inspection. 2020 Feb;24(1):80-7. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi. 2020. 24.1.80
  8. Pareek SN. Improvement in adhesion of polymeric repair and finish materials for reinforced concrete structures [phD thesis]. [koriyama (Japan)]: Nihon University. 1993. p. 80-106.
  9. Ohama Y. Principle of latex modification and some typical properties of latex-modified concrete. ACI Material Journal. 1987 Feb;84(6):511-8.
  10. Jo YK. Astudy on the improvement of adhesion in tension and flexure of polymer cement mortar depending on various test methods. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2019 Feb;19(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2019.19.047
  11. Sawaide M. Improved construction joint work of early-age concrete by polymer-emulsion treatments. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Polymers in Concrete; 1990 Sep 8-11; Shanghai (China).International Congress on Polymers in Concrete; 1990. p. 562-8.
  12. Ohama Y. Study on properties and mix proportioning of polymer-modified mortars for buildings. Report of the Building Research Institute. 1973 Oct;65:100-4.
  13. Jo YK. Properties of polymer cement mortars under combined cures. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2006 0ct;18(5):667-75. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2006.18.5.667
  14. Yoon YS, Cho SJ, Kwon SJ. Prediction equation for chloride diffusion in concrete containing GGBFS based on 2-Year cured results. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection. 2019 Mar;23(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2019.23.2.1
  15. Garbacz A. Sokolowska JJ. Concrete-like polymer composites with fly ashes-comparative study. Construction and Building Materials. 2013 Jan;38:689-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.052
  16. Jo YK. Tensile and adhesion properties of polymer cement mortar with EVA emulsion, blast-furnace slag and fly as has a repair material. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure &Construction. 2019 Nov; 35(11):147-54. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2019.35.11.147