Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제77권4호
  • /
  • Pages.463-472
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic response of torsional structures considering the possibility of diaphragm flexibility

  • Eivani, Hamed (Department of Civil Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Moghadam, Abdolreza S. (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (IIEES))
  • 투고 : 2019.08.20
  • 심사 : 2020.11.17
  • 발행 : 2021.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Fully rigid floor diaphragm is one of the main assumptions that are widely used in common practices due to its simple application. However, determining the exact degree of diaphragms flexibility cannot be easily accomplished without finite element modeling, which is an expensive and time-consuming procedure. Therefore, it is always possible that apparently rigid diaphragms, based on prescriptive limitations of seismic codes, experience some degrees of flexibility during the earthquakes. Since diaphragm flexibility has more uncertainties in asymmetric-plan structures, this study focuses on errors resulting from probable floor diaphragm flexibility of torsionally restrained structures. The analytical models used in this study were single-story buildings with asymmetric plan and RC shear walls. Although floor system is not considered explicitly, a wide range of considered diaphragm flexibility, from fully rigid to quite flexible, allows the results to be generalizable to a lot of lateral load resisting systems as well as floor systems. It has been shown that in addition to previously known effects of diaphragm flexibility, presence of orthogonal side elements during design procedure with rigid diaphragm assumption and rapid reduction in their absorbed forces can also be an important source to increase errors due to flexibility. Accordingly, from the obtained results the authors suggest designers to consider the possibility of diaphragm flexibility and its adverse effects, especially in torsionally restrained systems in their common designs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.
  2. Bakas, N. (2017), "Shear forces amplification due to torsion, explicit reliance on structural topology. Theoretical and numerical proofs using the Ratio of torsion (ROT) concept", Struct. Eng. Mech., 61(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.1.015.
  3. Correnza, J., Hutchinson, G. and Chandler, A. (1995), "Seismic energy-dissipation in torsionally responding building systems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 3(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1995.3.3.255.
  4. De-La-Colina, J. (1999), "In-plane floor flexibility effects on torsionally unbalanced systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 28(12), 1705-1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199912)28:12<1705::AID-EQE873>3.0.CO;2-5.
  5. Eivani, H. (2018), "The effects of semi-rigid diaphragm on the seismic response of torsional buildings with reinforced concrete shear walls", Ph.D. Dissertation, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran. (in Persion)
  6. Eivani, H., Moghadam, A.S., Aziminejad, A. and Nekooei, M. (2018), "Effects of diaphragm flexibility on seismic response of asymmetric-plan buildings", GRADEVINAR, 70(11), 965-974. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2146.2017.
  7. Eivani, H., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., Aziminejad, A. and Nekooei, M. (2018), "Seismic response of plan-asymmetric structures with diaphragm flexibility", Shock. Vib., 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4149212.
  8. Fleischman, R.B. and Farrow, K.T. (2001), "Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30(5), 745-763. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.36.
  9. Georgoussis, G.K. (2013), "Yield displacement profiles of asymmetric structures for optimum torsional response", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(2), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.2.233.
  10. Iranian National Building Code, Part 6 (2013), Design Loads for Buildings, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  11. Jeng, V. and Tsai, Y.L. (2002), "Correlation between torsional vibration and translational vibration", Struct. Eng. Mech., 13(6), 671-694. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.13.6.671.
  12. Ju, S.H. and Lin, M.C. (1999), "Comparison of building analyses assuming rigid or flexible floors", ASCE. J. Struct. Eng., 125(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:1(25).
  13. Kim, S.C. and White, D.W. (2004), "Nonlinear analysis of a one-story low-rise masonry building with a flexible diaphragm subjected to seismic excitation", Eng. Struct., 26(14), 2053-2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.008.
  14. Lee, H.J., Aschheim, M.A. and Kuchma, D. (2007), "Interstory drift estimates for low-rise flexible diaphragm structures", Eng Struct., 29(7), 1375-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.021.
  15. Moon, S.K. and Lee, D.G. (1994), "Effects of inplane floor slab flexibility on the seismic behaviour of building structures", Eng. Struct., 16(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(94)90038-8.
  16. Nakamura, Y., Derakhshan, H., Magenes, G. and Griffith, M.C. (2017), "Influence of diaphragm flexibility on seismic response of unreinforced masonry buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 21(6), 935-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1190799.
  17. OpenSees (2017), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation; Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), California, USA.
  18. Ozmen, G. and Gulay, F. (2002), "An investigation of torsionally irregular multi-story buildings under earthquake loading", Struct. Eng. Mech., 14(2), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.14.2.237.
  19. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  20. Rathje, E.M., Dawson, C., Padgett, J.E., Pinelli, J.P., Stanzione, D. and Adair, A. (2017), "Design Safe: new cyberinfrastructure for natural hazards engineering", Nat. Hazard. Rev., 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000246.
  21. Sadashiva, V.K., Macrae, G.A., Deam, B.L. and Spooner, M.S. (2012), "Quantifying the seismic response of structures with flexible diaphragms", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41(10), 1365-1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1187.
  22. Shepherd, R., Holmes, W.T., Lizundia, B., Aiken, I.D., De Angelis, C.A. and Bertero, V. (1990), "Buildings", Earthq. Spectra., 6(S1), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585603.
  23. Somers, P., Campi, D., Holmes, W., Kehoe, B.E., Klingner, R.E. and Lizundia, B. (1996), "Unreinforced masonry buildings", Earthq. Spectra., 12(S1), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585926.
  24. Standard No. 2800 (2014), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  25. Tena-Colunga, A. (1996), "Dynamic evaluation of Oakland's Tourraine Hotel subjected to Loma Prieta Earthquake ground motions", Proceedings of the 7th North American Masonry Conference, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States, June.
  26. Tena-Colunga, A. and Abrams, D.P. (1995), "Simplified 3-D dynamic analysis of structures with flexible diaphragms", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 24(2), 221-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240207.
  27. Tena-Colunga, A. and Abrams, D.P. (1996), "Seismic behavior of structures with flexible diaphragms", ASCE. J. Struct. Eng., 122(4), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(439).
  28. Tena-Colunga, A., Chinchilla-Portillo, K.L. and Juarez-Luna, G. (2015), "Assessment of the diaphragm condition for floor systems used in urban buildings", Eng. Struct., 93, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.025.
  29. Tso, W.K. and Myslimaj, B. (2002), "Effect of strength distribution on the inelastic torsional response of asymmetric structural systems", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK, September.