디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.249-260
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 간호대학생에게 적용한 플립러닝의 효과에 대한 메타분석

The effectiveness of a flipped learning on Korean nursing students; A meta-analysis

  • 강미정 (을지대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 강경자 (제주대학교 간호대학.건강과간호연구소)
  • Kang, Mi-Jung (College of Nursing, Eulji University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Ja (College of Nursing, Health and Nursing Reseach Institute, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.26
  • 심사 : 2021.01.20
  • 발행 : 2021.01.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 간호대학생을 대상으로 한 플립러닝 연구들의 결과를 통합하고 분석하기 위해 실시한 메타분석연구이다. 대상 문헌은 PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Korean databases가 이용되었으며 국내 간호학과학생들의 플립러닝 효과를 평가하는 무작위 실험과 비무작위 실험연구가 포함되었다. 95% 신뢰 구간과 SMD가 변량효과 메타분석 결과로 산출되었으며, 플립러닝 전체 효과 크기는 대조군에 비해 큰 효과 크기(SMD = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.84 ~ 1.63; I2 = 93.9; n = 23)로 나타났다. Bloom 분류에 따른 추가 분석 결과, 플립러닝은 심동적 영역, 인지적 영역, 정서적 영역의 변수들에 의미있게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 메타분석은 총 10건의 문헌 분석을 통해 국내의 간호학과 학생들에 대한 플립러닝 교수법이 전통적인 교수법보다 심동적 영역, 인지적 영역, 정서적 영역에서 효과적임을 보여주었다. 추후 플립러닝은 간호대학생들의 학문적 수행 능력 향상을 위한 이론수업 및 실습 간호교육에 까지 통합 되어질 수 있다.

This study is a meta-analysis study conducted to integrate and analyze the results of flip-learning studies for Korean nursing students. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Korean databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Non-Randomized controlled trials (Non-RCTs) evaluating the effects of flipped learning for Korean nursing students were included. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. The entire effect size in flipped learning was big in effect size (SMD = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.63; I2 = 93.9; n = 23) compared to the control groups. The analysis results of subgroups according to the classification of Bloom showed that flipped learning was found to have a significant effect on psychomotor domain, cognitive domain, and affective domain. A total of 10 literature analyses, this meta-analysis showed that flipped learning on Korean nursing students is effective in psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domain than the traditional teaching method. The flip learning can be integrated into theoretical and practical nursing education to improve the academic performance of nursing students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korean Education Development Institute University Competency Diagnosis center (2016). University basic competency assessment in 2021. https://uce.kedi.re.kr/introduce3.do
  2. Korean Nursing Education Evaluation Institute. http://www.kabone.or.kr/kabon02/index.php
  3. J. Bergmann & A. Sams. (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every day. Washington, DC:International Society for Technology in Education. Publishing.
  4. D. Y. Lee. (2014). Utilization of an educational information system for medical education. Korean Medical Education Review, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2014.16.1.001
  5. J. S. Bernard. (2015). The flipped classroom: fertile ground for nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 99-109. DOI : 10.1515/ijnes-2015-0005
  6. Y. S. Lee & Y. Eun. (2016). The effect of the flipped learning on self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, and communication competence of nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 22(4), 567-576. DOI : 10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.4.567
  7. J. Cha & J. H. Kim (2020). Effects of Flipped Learning on the Critical Thinking Disposition, Academic Achievement and Academic Self-efficacy of Nursing Students: A Mixed Methods Study. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 26(1), 25-35. DOI : 10.5977/jkasne.2020.26.1.25
  8. S. J. Han & H. C. Jeong. (2016). Study on the Effect and Experience of the Flipped Learning. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 6(1), 101-108. DOI : 10.14257/AJMAHS.2016.01.19
  9. V. Simpson & E. Richards. (2015). Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse education in practice, 15(3), 162-167. DOI : 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001
  10. M. R. Jung & E. Jeong. (2018). Effects of E-book-based Flipped Learning Education on Critical Thinking Disposition, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Major Satisfaction of Nursing Students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(2), 490-501. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.02.490
  11. H. J. Gu. (2016). Effectiveness of flipped learning in fundamental nursing practice education. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(5), 2829-2841.
  12. S. J. Chang & S. J. Jang. (2017). Effects of the Flipped Classroom Approach on the Psychiatric Nursing Practicum Course. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 26(2), 196-203. DOI : 10.12934/jkpmhn.2017.26.2.196
  13. J. H. Kong, E. J. Choi & O. H. Kim. (2018). The effect of the flipped learning on communication competence, academic self- efficacy of nursing students. The Journal of Korean Nursing Research, 2(2), 45-53.
  14. S. H. Bae & S. J. Shin. (2018). The Effect and Strategies of Flipped Learning in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review. Health & Nursing, 30(2), 1-9.
  15. B. Cho & J. Lee. (2018). A meta analysis on effects of flipped learning in Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 59-73. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.059
  16. R. Hu, H. Gao, Y. Ye, Z. N, N. Jiang & X. Jiang. (2018). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of nursing studies, 79, 94-103. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.012
  17. J. L. Jensen, T. A. Kummer & P. D. Godoy. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 5. DOI : 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
  18. J. P. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M J. Page & V.A. Welch (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
  19. L. A. Stewart, M. Clarke, M. Rovers, R. D. Riley, M. Simmonds, G. Stewart & J. F. Tierney. (2015). Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA, 313(16), 1657-1665. DOI : 10.1001/jama.2015.3656
  20. S. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, H. J. Seo, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Jang & H. J. Son. (2011). National evidence based health care collaboration agency. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, 64-91.
  21. B. Bloom. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York : Longmans, Green.
  22. R. DerSimonian & N. Laird. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemporary clinical trials, 45, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002
  23. M. O. Suh. (2016). The meta analysis of the effectiveness of flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 707-741. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.4.707
  24. K. F. Hew & C. K. Lo. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC medical education, 18(1), 38. DOI : 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
  25. E. O. Park & J. Park. (2016). A meta-analysis on flipped learning: Conditions for successful application and future research direction. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 27(1), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.1.169
  26. Z. Zainuddin & S. H. Halili. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. DOI : 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
  27. P. Xu, Y. Chen, W. Nie, Y. Wang, T. Song, H. Li, ... & L. Zhao. (2019). The effectiveness of a flipped classroom on the development of Chinese nursing students' skill competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse education today, 80, 67-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.06.005