Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Selection of Optimal Candidates for Free Trade Area in Incheon Port using CFPR Method

CFPR 방법을 활용한 인천항 자유무역지역 최적 후보지 선정에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Byung-Hwa (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Hoon (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jin (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Yeo, Gi-Tae (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • 김병화 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 박성훈 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 김현진 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 여기태 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원)
  • Received : 2020.12.02
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Incheon Port urgently requires designation of a free trade zone to pursue development linked with the port hinterland while promoting continuous growth of the port. This study aims to evaluate the optimal location and derive policy implications for the designation of a free trade zone and analyzed factors property divided by groups. This study used the Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation (CFPR) analysis technique to derive a practical construction direction by quantifying and evaluating linguistic measures. As a result, the Incheon New Port hinterland showed the highest location competitiveness among the four candidate areas of Incheon New Port hinterland, Aam Logistics Complex 2, North Port hinterland, and Gyeongin Port hinterland. Among the eight evaluation factors consisting of qualitative and quantitative factors, the Incheon New Port hinterland ranked no. 1 in all the four qualitative factors and one quantitative factor and received the highest total score. Also, Group 1 presented 'possibility to attract tenant companies' as first. Group 2 was 'complex size' and Group 3 was also 'possibility to attract tenant companies'. This study has the implication for suggesting the factors and evaluation structure of Free Trade Zone. Future research requires detailed empirical studies, such as expanding the subject of study or selecting factors that reflect the interests of each group.

인천항의 성장을 지속시키고 항만배후단지와 연계된 발전을 추구하기 위해서는 자유무역지역의 지정이 시급히 필요하다. 본 연구는 인천항 자유무역지역 최적 후보지에 대한 입지평가와 정책적 시사점을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 하였으며, 요인 우선순위를 그룹별로 도출하여 비교했다. 본 연구에서는 언어학적 척도를 정량화하고 평가할 수 있는 CFPR(Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation) 분석기법을 이용하였다. 인천항 자유무역지역의 입지를 평가한 결과, 인천신항 배후부지, 아암물류 2단지, 북항 배후단지, 경인항 배후단지 등 4개 후보지역 중 인천신항 배후부지가 가장 높은 점수를 받았다. 인천신항 배후부지는 정성적·정량적인 요인으로 구성된 총 8개의 평가요인 중 정성적인 요인 4개 모두에서 1위, 정량적 요인 1개 등 종합점수 1위로 인천항 자유무역지역 지정 최적 후보지로 평가되었다. 또한 그룹별 요인 중요도 비교에서는 그룹 1에서는 입주 기업 유치 가능성이 가장 높으며, 그룹 2는 단지 규모, 그리고 그룹 3에서도 입주 기업 유치 가능성이 가장 높은 중요도를 나타냈다. 본 연구는 자유무역지역 입지선정과 평가에 중요한 요인을 제시하였다는 시사점을 갖는다. 향후 연구에서는 연구 대상 확대 또는 각 집단의 이해관계를 반영한 요인선정등 세분화된 실증연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. S. Lee, D. H. Choi, S. H. Choi & J. S. Kim. (2018). Business Model Analysis in Vietnam Logistics Market. Korean Journal of Logistics, 26(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.15735/kls.2018.26.4.001
  2. J. S. Park & J. E. Lee. (2020). A Study on the Change of Logistics in the Pandemic Age. Korea Logistics Review, 30(4), 37-47.
  3. S. W. Kim. (2020). A Qualitative Study on the Cabotage issues in China and their Effects. Korea International Commercial Review, 35(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2020.35.3.269
  4. C. L. Qing. (2015). Using AHP Analysis of The Determinants of Port Hinterlands Competitiveness in China, Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 75, 133-151.
  5. UNCTAD (2019), World Investment Report. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2019_overview_en.pdf
  6. W. S. Kim (2014), A Study on Enhancing the Efficiency of Logistics in Managing Korea's Free Trade Zones for the Facilitation of Customs Administration. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 19(4), 149-168.
  7. W. S. Kim. (2014), A Study on the Revitalization and Additional Designation of Incheon Free Trade Zone, Incheon Development Institute
  8. H. J. Jung & D. H. Lee. (2018), A study on the activation plan of Pyeongtaek-Dangjin Port Free Trade Zone. Digital Convergence Research, 16(9), 115-123.
  9. E. H. Yoo. (2019), Analysis of Competitiveness Factors of Small and Medium-Sized Ports using AHP Method :Focused on Comparison between Daesan and Pyongtaek, Dangjin Ports. Journal of management & economics, 41(1), 155-183.
  10. K. J. Yoon, S. B. Ahn & H. Y. Lee (2018). A Study on the Development Strategy of Daesan Port in Seosan using AHP. Journal of the Korean Port Economic Association, 34(4), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2018.12.34.4.39
  11. K. S. Lee, H. S. Jang, S. H. Kim, G. H. Kim & B. B. Kim. (2020). A Study on Development Strategy of Yeosu Airport : Using a Tourism Industry and Gwangyang Bay Industry. Journal of East and Central Asian Studies, 31(2), 59-74.
  12. J. H. Park & Y. R. Shin. (2020.7), Study on the service quality of port facilities. Korea Maritime Science and Technology Council Joint Conference. (pp.145-146). Busan : KINPR
  13. K. H. Jo. (2018). Establishment of a new 10-year Free Economic Zone basic plan for the Free Economic Zone in Korea. Korean Society for Land and Urban Planning. Seoul : Korea Planning Association.
  14. Y. W Kim. (2020). A Comparative Study on Productivity by Characteristics of Tenant Company in Busan New Port Distripark. Master dissertation. Korea maritime & Ocean University, Busan.
  15. Y. S. Kim & Y. R. Shin (2018). Comparative study of economic effects by domestic port hinterland. Journal of the Korean Society for Trade and Commerce, 18(2), 73-93.
  16. K. S. Ahn. S. H. Park. H. C. Lee & G. T. Yeo, (2020). An Evaluation of Cold Chain Cluster Competitiveness in the Metropolitan Area. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(10), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.10.181
  17. H. S. Kim & Y. Shang (2019). A study on the Activation Schemes of Cold Chain Logistics System in Incheon port. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association. 35(3),19-40. https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2019.09.35.3.19
  18. K. J. Yun & S. W. Seo (2019). A Study on the Development of a Marine Industrial Cluster in Seosan-Daesan Port. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association. 35(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2019.03.35.1.19
  19. Y. Lee. G. H. Zhang & Y. H. Ahn. (2020). Analyzing Efficiency of the Free Trade Zones in Korea. Korea Logistics Review, 30(2), 13-22.
  20. H. J. Yang (2020). A Study on the Improvement of the System for the Creation of Value-added in Port-style Free Trade Zones. The Journal of Maritime Business. 45, 143-165.
  21. E. S. Cho (2018). Policy Consistency Assessment of Regional Industrial Policy and Cluster Development Policy. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies. 18(2), 127-152.
  22. H. J. Lee (2019). Study on Political Economy of the Ocean Capital Busan. The Journal of International Relations. 22(2), 1-15.
  23. T. H. Nam & G. T. Yeo. (2019). An Analysis of Drawing Government Supporting Policies for Mutual Growth of Shippers and Ship owners using CFPR method. Journal of Digital Convergence. 17(4), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.4.095
  24. R. H. Kang., T. H. Yang., H. C. Lee., S. H. Park & G. T. Yeo. (2020). A Study on the Factors of Selecting 3PL Companies by Using CFPR Method in Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence. 18(5), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.5.169
  25. W. K. Shin & J. Y. Roh. (2019). Study on the Pre-cautionary Method of Trade Remedy to Industrial Injury under the New Protectionism. Korean Journal of International Economic Law. 17(2), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.46271/kjiel.2019.07.17.2.109
  26. J. H. Na., B. H. Lee & H. J. Jung. (2019). Study on support plan for revitalization of exports to Jeollabuk-do. Jeonbuk Institute. 2020-10.
  27. J. H. Park. (2019). Background and characteristics of additional designation of China's free trade test zone. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. 19(33), 1-13.
  28. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport (2008). Designated as a new and expanded port-type free trade zone. Gwacheon Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport.