한국지진공학회논문집 (Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)

  • 제25권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-9
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-525X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1099(eISSN)
한국지진공학회 (Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전단파괴모드를 고려한 철근콘크리트 보통전단벽-골조 건물의 붕괴메커니즘

Collapse Mechanism of Ordinary RC Shear Wall-Frame Buildings Considering Shear Failure Mode

  • 추유림 (티아이구조기술사사무소) ;
  • 김태완 (강원대학교 건축.토목.환경공학부 건축공학전공)
  • Chu, Yurim (TI Structural Engineers) ;
  • Kim, Taewan (Department of Architectural, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.04
  • 심사 : 2020.10.14
  • 발행 : 2021.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Most commercial buildings among existing RC buildings in Korea have a multi-story wall-frame structure where RC shear wall is commonly used as its core at stairways or elevators. The members of the existing middle and low-rise wall-frame buildings are likely arranged in ordinary details considering building occupancy, and the importance and difficulty of member design. This is because there are few limitations, considerations, and financial burdens on the code for designing members with ordinary details. Compared with the intermediate or unique details, the ductility and overstrength are insufficient. Furthermore, the behavior of the member can be shear-dominated. Since shear failure in vertical members can cause a collapse of the entire structure, nonlinear characteristics such as shear strength and stiffness deterioration should be adequately reflected in the analysis model. With this background, an 8-story RC wall-frame building was designed as a building frame system with ordinary shear walls, and the effect of reflecting the shear failure mode of columns and walls on the collapse mechanism was investigated. As a result, the shear failure mode effect on the collapse mechanism was evident in walls, not columns. Consequently, it is recommended that the shear behavior characteristics of walls are explicitly considered in the analysis of wall-frame buildings with ordinary details.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee JY, Shin DI. Current Research Trends in Shear Strength Evaluation of RC Structural Members, Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2017;30(4):38-44.
  2. Chu YR, Kim TW, Kim SR. A Study on Potential of Engineered Wood for 9-story Office Buildings. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2017;21(4): 163-170.
  3. Kim TW, Chu YR, Kim SR. Seismic Performance Evaluation of a Mid-rise General Hospital Building. EESK J Earthquake Eng. 2017; 21(5):245-254.
  4. Elwood KJ. Modeling Failures in Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2004;31:846-859. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-040
  5. McKenna A, Hanna A, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce Framework for Analyzing Next-Generation DNA Sequencing Data. Genome Res 20. 2010;1297-1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
  6. LeBorgne MR. Modeling the Post Shear Failure Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns. Doctor of Philosophy. Austin, Texas: University of Texas at Austin. c2012.
  7. Vulcano A, Bertero VV, Colotti V. Analysis Modeling of RC Structural Walls. Berkeley:University of California; c1988. Report No. UCB/EERC-75/23.
  8. Linde P. Numerical Modeling and Capacity Design of Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Walls. Zurich : Institute of Structural Engineering. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH); c1993. Report No. 200.
  9. Colotti V. Shear Behavior of RC Structural Walls. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 1993;119(3):728-746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:3(728)
  10. Orakcal K, Wallace JW, Conte JP. Nonlinear Modeling and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls. ACI Structural Journal. 2004;101(3):688-698.
  11. Wang TY, Bertero VV, Popov EP. Hysteretic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Framed Walls. Berkeley, CA: University of California; c1975. Report No. UBC/EERC-75/23.
  12. Oesterel RG, Fiorato AE, Johal LS, Carpenter JE, Russell HG, Corley WG. Earthquake Resistant Structural Wall-Tests of Isolated Walls. Skokie, IL : PCA Construction Technology Laboratories. Rep. to National Science Foundation. c1976.
  13. Oesterel RG, Aristizabal-Ochoa JD. Fiorato AE, Russell HG, Corley WG. Earthquake Resistant Structural Walls-Tests of Isolated Walls-Phase II. Skokie, IL : PCA Construction Technology Laboratories. Rep. to National Science Foundation. c1979.
  14. Vallenas JM, Bertero VV, Popov EP. Hysteretic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls. Berkeley, CA : University of California; c1979. Report No. UBC/EERC-79/20.
  15. Hines EM, Seible F, Priestley MJN. Cyclic Tests of Structural Walls with Highly-confined Boundary Elements. San Diego : University of California; c1999. Report No. SSRP-99/15.
  16. Hines EM, Dazio A, Seible F. Seismic Performance of Hollow Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Piers with Highly-Confined Boundary Elements Phase III : Web Crushing Tests. San Diego : University of California; c2001. Report No. SSRP-2001/27.
  17. Thomsen JH, Wallace JW. Displacement-based Design Procedures for Slender Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls-Experimental Verification. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2004;130(4):618-630. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618)
  18. Massone LM and Wallace JW. Load-Deformation Responses of Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls. ACI Structural Journal. 2004; 101(1):103-113.
  19. Sayre B. Performance Evaluation of Steel Reinforced Shear Walls. M.S. thesis, Los Angeles : University of California; c2003.
  20. Dazio A, Beyer K, Bachmann H. Quasi-static Cyclic Tests and Plastic Hinge Analysis of RC Structural Walls. Engineering Structures. 2009;31(7):1556-1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.018
  21. Lowes NL, Lehman ED, Birely CA, Kuchma AD, Marley PK, Hart RC. Earthquake Response of Slender Planar Concrete Walls with Modern Detailing. Engineering Structures. 2012;43:31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.040
  22. Kolozvari K, Orakcal K, Wallace J. Modeling of Cyclic Shear-Flexure Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls. I: Theory. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2014;141(5):04014135-1-04014135-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001059
  23. KDS 41 17 00. Seismic Building Design Code. Korea Construction Standards Center. c2019.
  24. EESK. Guideline on Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings. Seoul: Gumi Seogwan; c2018.
  25. Kolozvari K, Orakcal K, Wallace J. Shear-Flexure Interaction Modeling for Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls and Columns under Reversed Cyclic Loading. Berkeley : Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; c2015. Report No. PEER 2015/12.
  26. Ghannoum W. Experimental and Analytical Dynamic Collapse Study of a Reinforced Concrete Frame with Light Transverse Reinforcement. Ph. D thesis. Berkeley, CA : University of California; c2007.
  27. ACI. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute; c2011. ACI 318-11.
  28. LeBorgne MR, Ghannoum W. Calibrated Analytical Element for Lateral-Strength Degradation of Reinforced Concrete Columns. Engineering Structures. 2014;81:35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.030
  29. Ulugtekin D. Analytical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Panel Elements under Reversed Cyclic Loadings. M.S. thesis. Istanbul, Turkey : Bogazici University. c2010.
  30. Chang GA, M ander JB. Seismic Energy Based Fatigue Damage Analysis of Bridge Columns: Part I - Evaluation of Seismic Capacity. Buffalo: State University of New York; c1994. NCEER Technical Report No. NCEER-94-0006.
  31. Kolozvari K. Analytical Modeling of Cyclic Shear-Flexure Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls. Ph. D thesis. Los Angeles : University of California. c2013.
  32. FEMA. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency; c2009. p.36-216. Report No. FEMA P695.
  33. ASCE. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers; c2013. p.179-224. ASCE 41-13.
  34. KDS 41 20 22. Concrete Structure Shear and Torsion Design Criteria. Korea Construction Standards Center. c2018.
  35. Korea Infrastructure Safety Engineering Center. Seismic Evaluation/Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation. c2019.
  36. Nosho K, Stanton K, MacRae G. Retrofit of Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns using Tonen Forca Tow Sheet Carbon Fiber Wrapping. Seattle, Washington: Department of Civil engineering, University of Washington; c1996. Report No. SGEM 96-2.
  37. Lynn A. Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Columns. Ph.D thesis. Berkely, California : University of California at Berkeley; c1999.
  38. Chun YS, Park JY, Lee SW. Development of Non-linear Hysteretic Model for the Performance Based Design(1). Daejeon: Korea Land and Housing Corporation; c2015. Report No. 2015-63.