DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Productivity Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Works and Tower Crane Working Ratio for High-rise Apartment Buildings

초고층 공동주택 RC 공사의 생산성 및 타워크레인 가동율 분석

  • Received : 2020.11.10
  • Accepted : 2020.11.23
  • Published : 2021.01.31

Abstract

The productivity of rebar-work and form-work was analyzed with data collected from an actual high-rise construction project, and the actual utilization rates of three tower cranes were also investigated. It was found that the average productivity of the form-work increased from 12.00~8.71(㎡/man·day) in the underground and above-ground/lower-floor to 11.94~20.73(㎡/man·day) in the standard floor. Comparing the productivity of core area to outer, the former was found to be about 11% higher. Moreover, the rebar-work productivity of the outer area(1.12 ton/man·day) was approximately 9.6% higher than that of the core area for the standard floor. The average utilization rates of three TC were surveyed to be about 63.49%, and it was revealed that rainy weather(6.1%), strong winds(6.1%), holidays(17.8%), TC lifting work(5.8%), and other failures and repairs(0.07%) were the causes of non-operation. These research results are expected to be beneficial data in planning and managing the process of high-rise RC construction works in the future.

초고층 건설사업의 골조 공사를 대상으로 철근, 형틀 작업의 생산성을 분석하고 타워 크레인(Tower Crane; TC)의 실질적인 가동률을 조사하였다. 코어부의 형틀작업 생산성은 지하 및 지상·저층부(1~7F) 구간에서는 평균 12.0~8.7(㎡/인·일)로, 기준층 구간(8~75F) 으로 진행될수록 11.9~20.7(㎡/인·일)로 생산성이 향상되는 것으로 분석되었다. 코어와 외주부의 기준층 생산성을 비교해보면 코어 생산성이 약 11% 정도 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기준층의 코어부위 철근작업 생산성(평균 1.02 ton/인·일) 대비 외주부(기준층 평균 1.12 ton/인·일)의 생산성은 대략 9.6% 높은 결과가 도출되었다. 또한, TC 세 대의 평균 가동률은 63.49%로 조사되었으며, 비가동일의 원인으로는 우천 6.1%, 강풍 6.1%, 휴무 17.8%, TC 인상작업 5.8%, 기타 고장 및 수리 등이 0.07% 인 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 향후 초고층 골조 공사의 공정을 계획하고 관리함에 있어 유용한 자료가 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang, J.S., Shin, Y.S., and Kang, K.I. (2005) "A Work Process for Productivity Improvement of Concrete Structural Frame Work in Tall Building." Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, pp. 161-164.
  2. Kim, T.H., Shin, Y.S., Cho, S.S., and Kang, K.I. (2007). "The Productivity Analysis by Slab Formwork of Structural Frame Work in Tall Building Construction - Focused on 3 Day Cyce-." Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, pp. 115-118.
  3. Kim, Y.S. (1994). "Analysis of the Factors Influencing Construction Productivity." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 1(10), pp. 65-74.
  4. Lee, K.J., and Kim, Y.S. (2010). "An Importance Analysis for the Major Schedule Management Factors Classified by Construction Participants in High-rise Building Reinforced Concrete Work." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 26(12), pp. 185-192.
  5. Son, C.B., and Lee, D.C. (2005). "An Analysis on the Selection and Application of Productivity Improving Factors in Apartment Building Construction." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 21(4), pp. 133-140.
  6. Son, C.B., and Lee, D.C. (2002). "An Analysis on the Factors Decreasing Productivity of Building Construction." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 18(12), pp. 125-132.
  7. Son, J.W., Yoon, J.S., and Paek, J.H. (2003). "A Study on Construction Productivity Measurement Method." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 19(10), pp. 101-108.