Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis on the Pollination Potential Environment of Apis millifera and Bombus ignitus Using the Maxent Model - Focused on Seoul -

Maxent 모델을 이용한 호박벌과 양봉꿀벌의 수분 잠재환경 비교 분석 - 서울시를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Yoon-Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Kongju National University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Hyeon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kongju National University) ;
  • Bae, Yang-Seop (Dept. of Biological Sciences, Incheon National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Jong (Dept. of Landcape Architecture & Environmental Planning, Graduate school of Kongju National University) ;
  • Son, In-Ki (Dept. of Landcape Architecture & Environmental Planning, Graduate school of Kongju National University)
  • 김윤호 (공주대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 조용현 (공주대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 배양섭 (인천대학교 생명과학부) ;
  • 김태종 (공주대학교 대학원 조경.환경계획학과) ;
  • 손인기 (공주대학교 대학원 조경.환경계획학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.02
  • Accepted : 2020.12.03
  • Published : 2021.02.26
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The honey bee has a crucial ecological status for maintaining the natural ecology system. Pollination mediations by honey bees are recognized as an efficient way to enhance the quality of biological diversity and green areas in the nature and the urban ecological system. However, the population of bee around the world is decreasing and we do not know exactly how bees react to the physical environment in the urban area. This study is a basic research for the improvement of pollination services in the Korean urban ecological system. It aims to induce and review environmental variables which have high relations with the activities of pollination mediation insects in the urban area. The study established a Maxent model using five urban environmental variables that reflect the ecology of Bombus ignitus and the place information where Bombus ignitus appears in 18 spots of Seoul city, and compared with previous research results on Apis millifera. Bombus ignitus preferred places with more natural environments such as mountain forest areas and vicinities of streams. They preferred Stratified Tree Area the most among the vegetation types existing in the urban area. Comparing chicken models, both species saw their response value drop as the building coverage rose. In the case of Apis millifera and Bombus ignitus variables, the response value of both species was high in 10 out of 20 types. The result of this study is expected to provide basic information for improving the pollination services in the Korean urban area and to be utilized as the basic materials for the future urban planning.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 결과물은 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 도시생태 건강성 증진 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다. (2019002770001)

References

  1. Abou-Shaara H.F., A.A. Al-Ghamdi and AA. Mohamed. 2012. Tolerance of two honey bee races to various temperature and relative humidity gradients. Environmental and experimental Biology. 10(4) : 133-138.
  2. Ahrne K., J. Bengtsson and T. Elmqvist. 2009. Bumble bees (Bombus spp) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PloS one. 4(5) : e5574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005574
  3. Barth F.G. 1985. Insects and flowers. The Biology of a Partnership. George Allen & Unwin: United Kingdom.
  4. Carvell C., D.B. Roy., S.M. Smart., R.F. Pywell., C.D. Preston and D. Goulson. 2006. Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biological conservation. 132(4) : 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.008
  5. Cawley G.C and N.L. Talbot. 2003. Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation of kernel fisher discriminant classifiers. Patern Recognition. 36(1) : 2585-2592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00136-5
  6. Damon M., R. Hall., K. Gerardo., O. Revecca., A. Jeff., A. Karin., S. Mike., C. John., F. Katherine., F. Robert., G. Gordon., G. Dave., E. Bengt., I. Mick., L. Lanet., L. Gail., S. David., M. Emily., G. Stacy., H. Simon., M. Muzafar., N. Edward-Graham and G. Caragh. 2016. The city as a refuge for insect pollinators. Conservation Biology. 31(1) : 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12840
  7. Elith J., C.H. Graham., R.P. Anderson., M. Dudik., S. Ferrier., A. Guisan., R.J. Hijmans., F. Huettmann., J.R. Leathwick., A. Lehmann., J. Li., L.G. Lohmann., B.A. Loiselle., G. Manion., C. Moritz., M. Nakamura., Y. Nakazawa., J. McC., M. Overton., A.T. Peterson., S.J. Phillips., K. Richardson., R. Scachetti-Pereira., RE. Schapire., J. Soberon., S. Williams., M.S. Wisz and NE. Zimmermann. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 29(2) : 129-151.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
  8. Gill N.S. and F. Sangermano. 2016. Africanized honeybee habitat suitability: a comparison between models for southern Utah and southern California. Applied Geography. 76 : 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.002
  9. Goulson D. 2003. Bumblebees: their behaviour and ecology. Oxford University Press: England.
  10. Goulson D., G.C. Lye and B. Darvill. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol. 53 : 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
  11. Greenleaf S.S., N.W. Williams., R. Winfree and C. Kremen. 2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia. 153(3) : 589-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9
  12. Hatfield, R.G and G. LeBuhn. 2007. Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp.(Hymenoptera: Apidae), in montane meadows. Biological Conservation. 139(1-2) : 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.019
  13. Hendrix S.D., KS. Kwaiser and SB. Heard. 2010. Bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of small Iowa hill prairies are as diverse and rich as those of large prairie preserves. Biodiversity and Conservation. 19(6) : 1699-1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9797-x
  14. Hernandez J.L., G.W. Frankie and R.W. Thorp. 2009. Ecology of urban bees: a review of current knowledge and directions for future study. Cities and the Environment. 2(1) : 3.
  15. Jha S and C. Kremen. 2013. Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(2) : 555-558. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208682110
  16. Kenta T., N. Inari., T. Nagamitsu., K. Goka and T. Hiura. 2007. Commercialized European bumblebee can cause pollination disturbance: an experiment on seven native plant species in Japan. Biological Conservation. 134(3) : 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.023
  17. Kim W.M., W.K. Song., S.Y. Kim, E.J. Hyung and S.H. Lee. 2017. Habitat analysis study of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in urban area using species distribution modeling - focused on Cheonan. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(3) : 55-64.
  18. Kim Y.H., Y.H. Cho., Y.S. Bae., D.Y. Kim. 2020. The Analysis of Pollination Potential Enviroment for Apis millifera in Seoul Using Maxent Modeling Approach. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 23(4) : 85-96.
  19. Knight M.E., A.P. Martin., S. Bishop., J.L. Osborne., R.J. Hale., R.A. Sanderson and D. Goulson. 2005. An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Molecular Ecology. 14(6) : 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x
  20. Lee J.M., YL. Kim, CH. Kim and SH. Woo. 2019. Beekeeping crisis and implications. KREI Agriculture Policy Focus. 178 : 1-24. (in Korean with English summary)
  21. Matteson K.C and G.A. Langellotto. 2009. Bumble bee abundance in New York City community gardens: implications for urban agriculture. Cities and the Environment. 2(1): 5.
  22. Matteson K.C and G.A. Langellotto. 2010. Determinates of inner city butterfly and bee species richness. Urban Ecosystems. 13(3) : 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0122-y
  23. Matteson K.C., J.S. Ascher and G.A. Langellotto. 2008. Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 101(1) : 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[140:BRAAIN]2.0.CO;2
  24. McFrederick Q.S and G. LeBuhn. 2006. Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp.(Hymenoptera: Apidae)?. Biological conservation. 129(3) : 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.004
  25. McKinney M.L. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban ecosystems. 11(2) : 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
  26. Osborne J.L., S.J. Clark., R.J. Morris., I.H. Williams., J.R. Riley., A.D. Smith., D.R. Reynolds and A.S. Edwards. 1999. A landscape scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology. 36(4) : 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00428.x
  27. Phillips S.J. and M. Dudik. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 31(2) : 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
  28. Potts S.G., J.C. Biesmeijer., C. Kremen., P. Neumann., O. Schweiger and W.E. Kunin. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25(6) : 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
  29. Rebecca T., F. Jeremie., A. John., E. Katherine and L. Daniel. 2011. A comparison of bee communities of Chicago green roofs, parks and prairies. Landscape and Urban Planning. 103 : 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.004
  30. Saure C. 1996. Urban habitats for bees: the example of the city of Berlin. Academic Press: New York.
  31. Seoul Development Institute. 2004. Characteristics of seoul biotope types and enhancing biodiversity.
  32. Sikora A and M. Kelm. 2012. Flower preferences of the Wroclaw Botanical Garden bumblebees (Bombus spp.). Journal of Apicultural Science. 56(2) : 27-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0021-y
  33. Silva D.P., V.H. Gonzalez., G.A. Melo., M. Lucia., L.J. Alvarez., and P. De Marco Jr. 2014. Seeking the flowers for the bees: integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America. Ecological Modelling. 273 : 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.016
  34. Steffan-Dewenter I., U. Munzenberg., C. Burger., C. Thies and T. Tscharntke. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology. 83(5): 1421-1432. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:sdeolc]2.0.co;2
  35. Stohlgren T.J., C.S. Jarnevich, W.E. Esaias and J.T. Morisette. 2011. Bounding species distribution models. Current Zoology. 57(5): 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.5.642
  36. Tommasi D., A. Miro., H.A. Higo and M.L. Winston. 2004. Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Canadian Entomologist. 136(6) : 851-869. https://doi.org/10.4039/n04-010
  37. Visscher P.K and T.D. Seeley. 1982. Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology. 63(6) : 1790-1801. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940121
  38. Velthuis H.H and A. Van Doorn. 2006. A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie. 37(4) : 421-451. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006019
  39. Widmer A and P. Schmid-Hempel. 1999. The population genetic structure of a large temperate pollinator species, Bombus pascuorum (Scopoli) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Molecular Ecology. 8(3) : 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00584.x
  40. Wojcik V. 2011. Resource abundance and distribution drive bee visitation within developing tropical urban landscapes. Journal of Pollination Ecology. 4 : 48-56. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)8
  41. Xinyu L., M. Weihau., S. Jinshan., L. Denglong., F. Yujia., S. Wenting., X. Kai., D. Yali and J. Yusuo. 2019. Tolerance and response of two honeybee species Apis cerana and Apis mellifera to high temperature and relative humidity. PloS one. 14(6) : e0217921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217921