산업융합연구 (Journal of Industrial Convergence)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.7-15
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2635-8875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2672-0124(eISSN)
대한산업경영학회 (DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학교 조직에서의 교사 갈등에 대한 영향 요인 분석

Analyses of Factors Affecting Conflict of Teachers in School

  • 장봉석 (국립목포대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 김진철 (교육부 중앙교육연수원)
  • Jang, Bong Seok (Dept. of Education, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin Cheol (National Education Training Institute, Ministry of Education)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.19
  • 심사 : 2021.02.20
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 학교 조직에서의 교사 갈등에 대한 영향 요인을 탐색하기 위해 실시되었다. 연구를 위해 학교조직 구성원, 교육 수요자, 교육정책에 대한 갈등의 영향 요인을 분석하였으며, 독립변인은 개인, 학교, 지역 수준으로 구분하여 설정하였다. S시교육청 소속 교사 561명의 응답 자료가 분석에 활용되었으며, SPSS 24.0 프로그램을 활용하여 위계적 중다회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 교사 갈등 전체에 대해 개인 수준에서는 경력, 학교 수준에서는 담임 여부와 전입 여부, 지역 수준에서는 근무 지역이 통계적으로 유의한 변인으로 나타났다. 연구 결과를 토대로 교육청과 단위학교 수준으로 구분하여 교사 갈등에 대한 지원 방안을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate factors affecting conflict of teachers in school. Researchers selected independent variables in personal, school, and local levels and analyzed their influence on conflict of faculty and staff, students and parents, and educational policy. We used 561 survey responses of teachers working in S City Office of Education and conducted hierarchical multiple regression analysis using SPSS 24.0. For results, we found out that variables such as career in the level of person, homeroom teacher and status in the level of school, and location in the level of region were statistically significant. Researchers suggested possible solutions which can be considered by school district and school officials.

키워드

과제정보

The manuscript is a revised version of the research paper in Sejong City Office of Education.

참고문헌

  1. Y. J. Kim. (1998). Conflict Analysis of Female Teachers of Elementary School, Master's Theis, The Graduate School of Dankuk University, Seoul.
  2. M. A. Rahim. (2010). Referent Role and Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 79-86.
  3. E. M. Hanson. (1991). Educational Administration and Organizational Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  4. H. J. Kwon. (2001). The factors of High school teacher's conflict and its management, Master's Theis, The Graduate School of Donga University, Busan.
  5. M. G. Lim. (2017). A Study on the Relationships between the Primary School Principals ' Conflict Management Strategies and the Teacher Efficacy, Master's Theis, The Graduate School of Busan National University of Education, Busan.
  6. S. P. Robbins. (1974). Managing Organizational Conflict: A Nontraditional Approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  7. E. Bae & C. Joo. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary School Teacher Perceptions on the Processing and Utilization of Teacher Evaluation Results. Teacher Education Research, 53(4), 525-544. DOI : 10.15812/ter.53.4.201412.525.
  8. E. Kim & S. Min. (2015). Does the Introduction of Free Learning Semester Policy increase teachers' workload? The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 32(2), 181-203. DOI : 10.24211/tjkte.2015.32.2.181.
  9. S. Park & H. Shin. (2019). Conflicts and Issues on Parental Participation in School Management. The Journal of Politics of Education, 26(3), 401-421.
  10. Y. U. Kwon. (2007). A Study on the Main Factor of troubles and Dealing with them among Secondary School Teachers, Master's Theis, The Graduate School of Aju University, Suwon.
  11. R. Ravid. (2020). Practical Statistics for Educators. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  12. S. Dogan. (2016). Conflicts Management Model in School: A Mixed Design Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 200-219. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p200
  13. A. Saiti. (2015). Conflicts in Schools, Conflict Management Styles and the Role of the School Leader: A Study of Greek Primary School Educators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 582-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214523007