DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategic width-wise arrangement of viscous dampers in steel buildings under strong earthquakes

  • Huang, Xiameng (School of Navigation Engineering, Guangzhou Maritime University)
  • Received : 2020.02.10
  • Accepted : 2021.02.17
  • Published : 2021.02.25

Abstract

Supplemental passive dampers are widely employed to improve the structural performance of buildings under seismic excitations. Nevertheless, the added damping could be counter-productive if the axial forces induced by the damper reaction forces are not routed properly in the columns. A few researchers engaged to optimize the width-wise damper arrangement to improve the delivered path of the axial column forces. However, most of these studies are limited under the design-based seismic level and few of them has evaluated the collapse performance of buildings under strong earthquakes. In this paper, the strategic width-wise placement method of viscous dampers is explored regarding the building performance under collapse state. Two realistic steel buildings with different storeys are modelled and compared to explore higher mode effects. Each building is designed with four different damper arrangement scenarios based on a classic damper distribution method. Both a far-fault and a near-fault seismic environment are considered for the buildings. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is performed to evaluate the probability of collapse and the plastic mechanism of the retrofitted steel buildings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The research described in this paper was financially supported by the University of Warwick and the China Scholarship Council.

References

  1. Apostolakis, G. (2020), "Optimal evolutionary seismic design of three-dimensional multistory structures with damping devices", J. Struct. Eng., 146(10), 04020205-1:16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002775.
  2. Apostolakis, G. and Dargush, G.F. (2010), "Optimal seismic design of moment-resisting steel frames with hysteretic passive devices", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(4), 355-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.944.
  3. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1486-1501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
  4. Champion, C. and Liel, A. (2012), "The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(10), 1391-1409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1188.
  5. Constantinou, M.C., Symans, M.D. (1993), "Seismic response of structures with supplemental damping", Sturct. Des. Tall. Spec., 2(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.4320020202.
  6. EC3. Eurocode 3 (2005), Design of Steel Structures
  7. EC8. Eurocode 8 (2013), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance
  8. FEMA P695 (2008), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, ATC-63 Project, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.
  9. Gobbo, G.M., William, M.S. and Blakeborough, A. (2018), "Comparing fluid viscous damper placement methods considering total‐building seismic performance", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(14), 2864-2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3117.
  10. Huang, X.M. (2018), "Evaluation of genetic algorithms for the optimum distribution of viscous dampers in steel frames under strong earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 14(3), 215-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.3.215.
  11. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2006), "Displacement-based design of supplemental dampers for seismic retrofit of a framed structure", J. Struct. Eng., 132(6), 873-883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:6(873).
  12. Krawinkler, H. (1978), "Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of frames", Eng. J., 15(2), 82-91.
  13. Lee, K., Ricles, J. and Sause, R. (2009), "Performance-based seismic design of steel MRFs with elastomeric dampers", J. Struct. Eng., 135(5), 489-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:5(489).
  14. Lignos, D.G., Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
  15. Lignos, D.G., Krawinkler, H. and Whittaker, A.S. (2011), "Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4-story steel moment frame", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(7), 807-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1061.
  16. Mezzi, M. (2010), "Innovative configurations and morphologies using dissipating bracing systems", The 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 2010.
  17. Miyamoto, H.K., Gilani, A.S.J., Wada, A. and Ariyaratana, C. (2010), "Limit states and failure mechanisms of viscous dampers and the implications for large earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1279-1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.993.
  18. Newell, J. and Uang, C.M. (2006), "Cyclic behavior of steel columns with combined high axial load and drift demand", Report No. SSRP-06/22, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  19. OpenSees (2016), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.
  20. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2021), NGA Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga.
  21. Pollini, N., Lavan, O. and Amir, O. (2018), "Optimization-based minimum-cost seismic retrofitting of hysteretic frames with nonlinear fluid viscous dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(15), 2985-3005. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3118.
  22. Porter, K., Kennedy, R. and Bachman, R. (2007), "Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering", Earthq. Spectra, 23(2), 471-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892.
  23. Seleemah, A.A. and Constantinou, M.C. (1997), "Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers", Technical Report No. NCEER-97-0004, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.
  24. Seo, C., Karavasilis, T.L., Ricles, J.M. and Sause, R. (2014), "Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance assessment of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(14), 2135-2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2440.
  25. Symans, M.D., Charney, F.A., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C., Kircher, C.A., Johnson, M.W. and McNamara, R.J. (2008), "Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice and recent developments", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339445(2008)134:1(3).
  26. Taylor Devices Inc. (2018), http://www.taylordevices.com.
  27. Tzimas, A.S., Dimopoulos, A.I. and Karavasilis, T.L. (2015), "EC8-based seismic design and assessment of self-centering post-tensioned steel frames with viscous dampers", J. Constr. Steel Res., 105, 60-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.022.
  28. Tzimas, A.S., Kamaris, G.S., Karavasilis, T.L. and Galasso, C. (2016), "Collapse risk and residual drift performance of steel buildings using post-tensioned MRFs and viscous dampers in near-fault regions", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14, 1643-1662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9898-3.
  29. Uriz, P. and Whittaker, A.S. (2001), "Retrofit of pre‐Northridge steel moment‐resisting frames using fluid viscous dampers", Sturct. Des. Tall. Spec., 10(5), 371-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tal.199.
  30. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
  31. Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C., Ramirez, O.M. and Johnson, M.W. (2003), "Chrysostomou CZ. Equivalent lateral force and modal analysis procedures of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions for buildings with damping systems", Earthq. Spectra, 19(4), 959-980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1622391.
  32. Whittle, J.K., Williams, M.S. and Blakeborough, A. (2012b), "Performance of Structural Members In Seismic Retrofitted Frames with Viscous Dampers", 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
  33. Whittle, J.K., Williams, M.S., Karavasilis, T.L. and Blakeborough, A. (2012a), "A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(4), 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.653864.