DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Explainable AI Application for Machine Predictive Maintenance

설명 가능한 AI를 적용한 기계 예지 정비 방법

  • Received : 2021.12.13
  • Accepted : 2021.12.21
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Predictive maintenance has been one of important applications of data science technology that creates a predictive model by collecting numerous data related to management targeted equipment. It does not predict equipment failure with just one or two signs, but quantifies and models numerous symptoms and historical data of actual failure. Statistical methods were used a lot in the past as this predictive maintenance method, but recently, many machine learning-based methods have been proposed. Such proposed machine learning-based methods are preferable in that they show more accurate prediction performance. However, with the exception of some learning models such as decision tree-based models, it is very difficult to explicitly know the structure of learning models (Black-Box Model) and to explain to what extent certain attributes (features or variables) of the learning model affected the prediction results. To overcome this problem, a recently proposed study is an explainable artificial intelligence (AI). It is a methodology that makes it easy for users to understand and trust the results of machine learning-based learning models. In this paper, we propose an explainable AI method to further enhance the explanatory power of the existing learning model by targeting the previously proposedpredictive model [5] that learned data from a core facility (Hyper Compressor) of a domestic chemical plant that produces polyethylene. The ensemble prediction model, which is a black box model, wasconverted to a white box model using the Explainable AI. The proposed methodology explains the direction of control for the major features in the failure prediction results through the Explainable AI. Through this methodology, it is possible to flexibly replace the timing of maintenance of the machine and supply and demand of parts, and to improve the efficiency of the facility operation through proper pre-control.

Keywords

References

  1. Adam-Bourdarios, C., Cowan G., Germain, C., Guyon, I., Kgl, B., Rousseau, D., The Higgs boson machine learning challenge, NIPS 2014 Workshop on High-energy Physics and Machine Learning, 2015.
  2. Ahn, D., Smart Factory and Data Analysis, ETNews, 2019.06.20.
  3. Babajide Mustapha, I. and Saeed, F. Bioactive molecule prediction using extreme gradient boosting, Molecules, 2016, Vol. 21, No. 8, p. 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21080983
  4. Baehrens, D., Schroeter, T., Harmeling, S., Kawanabe, M., Hansen, K., and Muller, K., How to explain individual classification decisions. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, Vol. 11, pp. 1803-1831.
  5. Cheon, K. and Yang, J. An Ensemble Model for Machine Failure Prediction, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2020, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp 123-131. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2020.43.1.123
  6. Chun, Y., Kim, S., Lee, J., and Woo, J., Study on credit rating model using explainable AI, Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 2021, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 283-295. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2021.32.2.283
  7. Heckert, N.A., Filliben, CM., Croarkin, B., Hembree, William, F., Guthrie, P., Tobias, and Prinz, J., e-Handbook of Statistical Method-NIST/SEMATECH, 2002, [Online]. Available: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
  8. Jung, C. and Lee, H., Explainable artificial intelligence based process mining analysis automation, Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers, 2019, Vol. 56, No. 11, pp. 45-51. https://doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2019.56.11.45
  9. Kim, S., Kim, W., Jang, Y., Kim, H., Development of Explainable AI-Based Learning Support System, The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 107-115. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2021.24.1.012
  10. Ko, G., Lim, G., and Cho, H., Survey on feature attribution methods in explainable AI, Journal of KIISE, 2020, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1181-1191. https://doi.org/10.5626/jok.2020.47.12.1181
  11. Korea Electric Power Co., Research on facility investment and failure evaluation system establishment to prevent failure of substation facilities, 2010, KEPCO.
  12. Lee, G.H., An RNN-based Fault Detection Scheme for Digital Sensor, The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 2019, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 29-35. https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2019.19.1.29
  13. Lee, J.H., Fault diagnosis of bearings using machine learning algorithm, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 2019, Vol. 43, No.6, pp.455-462.
  14. Lim, J., Introduction of conformity verification methodology for credit rating system, in Risk Review of Financial Supervisory Service, 2005.
  15. Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.I., A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, Vol. 30, pp. 4768-4777.
  16. Park, S.G., A Fault Diagnosis on the Rotating Machinery Using MTS, Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, 2008, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 619-623. https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2008.18.6.619
  17. Phoboo, Abha Eli. Machine learning wins the Higgs challenge, 2014, No. BULNA-2014-265.
  18. Shapley, L.S., A value for n-person games. In: Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2, 1953, Princeton University Press, pp. 307-317.