Research in Community and Public Health Nursing (지역사회간호학회지)

Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing (한국지역사회간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the Self-Care Non-adherence Risk Assessment Scale for Patients with Chronic Illness

만성질환자의 자가간호 불이행 위험 사정도구 개발

  • Received : 2021.05.25
  • Accepted : 2021.09.28
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop the Self-Care Non-adherence Risk Assessment Scale (SCNRAS) for patients with chronic illness in South Korea. Methods: This study was conducted from April to July, 2020 and utilized a convenience sampling method to recruit 336 patients with chronic illness from three hospitals located in South Korea. The content, factorial structure, item-convergent/discriminant validity, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were evaluated. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Pearson's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's α, and intra-class correlation coefficient. Results: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded six-factors. Convergent validity was demonstrated using measures of defining issues. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach's α of .65~.81 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of .93~.98. The Self-Care Non-adherence Risk Assessment Scale for patients with chronic illness is a new instrument that comprehensively measures the knowledge, skill, physical function status, access to health care, social support, motivation, and confidence. It comprises 18 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The validity and reliability of the scale were verified. Conclusion: The scale developed through this study is expected to screen those who need nursing intervention early by predicting the self-care non-adherence risk group.

Keywords

References

  1. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Preventive medicine and public health. 3rd ed. Seoul: Gyechuk Munwhasa; 2017. 1,240 p.
  2. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2011 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2020 January 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_profiles2011/en/
  3. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD reviews of health care quality: Korea-raising standards. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2012. 166 p.
  4. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Current status and issues of chronic diseases in 2020, chronic diseases FACT BOOK. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2021. 122 p.
  5. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science. 2012;35(3):194-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/ans.0b013e318261b1ba
  6. Vellone E, Fida R, Ghezzi V, D'Agostino F, Biagioli V, Paturzo M, et al. Patterns of self-care in adults with heart failure and their associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life, and hospitalizations: A cluster analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2017;32(2):180-189. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcn.0000000000000325
  7. Kessing D, Denollet J, Widdershoven J, Kupper N. Self-care and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Heart Failure. 2016;4(3):176-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.12.006
  8. Doubova SV, Martinez-Vega IP, Aguirre-Hernandez R, Perez-Cuevas R. Association of hypertension-related distress with lack of self-care among hypertensive patients. Health & Medicine. 2017;22(1):51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2016.1239830
  9. Park HN, Kim MH, Park JH. The relationships between self-care knowledge and compliance of ischemic stroke patients with diabetics. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2015;16(11):7513-7523. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.11.7513
  10. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Lee CS, Stromberg A. Integrating symptoms into the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science. 2019;42(3):206-215. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000237
  11. Aronson JK. Compliance, concordance, adherence. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;63(4):383-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02893.x
  12. National Institute of the Korean Language. Standard Korean Dictionary [Internet]. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language. 2020 [cited 2020 January 16]. Available from: https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchResult.do?pageSize=10&searchKeyword=%EC%9C%84%ED%97%98
  13. Geden E, Taylor S. Construct and empirical validity of the self-as-carer inventory. Nursing Research. 1991;40(1):47-50.
  14. Gu MO. Study of the relationship among self efficacy, self regulation, situational barriers and self care behavior in patients with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1994;24(4):635-651. https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1994.24.4.635
  15. Mulvaney SA, Hood KK, Schlundt DG, Osborn CY, Johnson KB, Rothman RL, et al. Development and initial validation of the barriers to diabetes adherence measure for adolescents. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2011;94(1):77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.010
  16. van der Wal MHL, Jaarsma T, Moser DK, van Veldhuisen DJ. Development and testing of the Dutch heart failure knowledge scale. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2005; 4(4):273-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.07.003
  17. Kim CJ, Chae SM, Yoo H. Psychometric testing of the chronic disease self-efficacy scale-Korean version (CDSES-K). Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2012;23(2):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659611434059
  18. Bezerra de Souza DL, Oliveras-Fabregas A, Espelt A, Bosque-Prous M, de Camargo Cancela M, Teixido-Compano E, et al. Multimorbidity and its associated factors among adults aged 50 and over: A cross-sectional study in 17 European countries. Public Library of Science One. 2021;16(2):e0246623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246623
  19. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Chapel Hill, USA: Sage publications; 2017. 280 p.
  20. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  21. Jeon MK, Ahn JW, Park YH, Lee MK. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the partners in health scale (PIH-K). Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing 2019;12(2):1-12. https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2019.12.2.1
  22. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1998;1(1):104-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
  23. Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(1):16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
  24. Kane R. Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. 2nd ed. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2006.
  25. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage publications; 2013.
  26. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research. 2003;8(2):23-74.
  27. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications; 1993. p. 136-162.
  28. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103(3):391-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
  29. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;105(3):430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
  30. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. 2018;48(6):1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  31. Cicchetti DV. Methodological commentary the precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: Distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2001;23(5):695-700. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.5.695.1249
  32. Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;45(5):587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  33. Lee KS, Lennie TA, Yoon JY, Wu J-R, Moser DK. Living arrangements modify the relationship between depressive symptoms and self-care in patients with heart failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2017;32(2):171-179. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000327
  34. Vest BM, Kahn LS, Danzo A, Tumiel-Berhalter L, Schuster RC, Karl R, et al. Diabetes self-management in a low-income population: Impacts of social support and relationships with the health care system. Chronic Illness. 2013;9(2):145-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395313475674
  35. Lundberg PC, Thrakul S. Diabetes type 2 self-management among Thai Muslim women. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness. 2011;3(1):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-9824.2011.01079.x
  36. Orzech KM, Vivian J, Huebner Torres C, Armin J, Shaw SJ. Diet and exercise adherence and practices among medically underserved patients with chronic disease: Variation across four ethnic groups. Health Education & Behavior. 2013;40(1):56-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112436970