한국미생물·생명공학회지 (Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters)

  • 제49권4호
  • /
  • Pages.559-565
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-642X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7305(eISSN)
한국미생물·생명공학회 (The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB)와 5-L 발효기를 이용한 γ-Aminobutyric Acid 생산기술 개발

Evaluation of γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria Using 5-L Fermentor

  • 김나연 (한경대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 김지민 (한경대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 라채훈 (한경대학교 식품생명공학과)
  • Kim, Na Yeon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Global K-Food Research Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Ji Min (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Global K-Food Research Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Ra, Chae Hun (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Global K-Food Research Center, Hankyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.23
  • 심사 : 2021.11.01
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

유산균 L. plantarum SGL058과 L. lactis SGL027로부터 OFAT 방법을 이용하여 탄소원 및 질소원의 종류와 농도에 대해 실험을 진행하였다. 또한 TLC 분석방법을 통해 GABA 생성능력이 우수한 균주 L. plantarum SGL058과 L. lactis SGL027를 선정하였다. 두 균주를 이용하여 각각 5-L 발효기에서 546.7 ㎍/ml (L. plantarum SGL058)과 404.6 ㎍/ml (L. lactis SGL027)의 GABA를 생산하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 유산균을 이용한 GABA 생산과정에 있어서 유용한 정보를 제공할 것으로 판단된다.

This study aimed to optimize gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production by employing five strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that were capable of high cell growth and GABA production using a modified synthetic medium. GABA production in the strains was qualitatively confirmed via detection of colored spots using thin layer chromatography. Lactobacillus plantarum SGL058 and Lactococcus lactis SGL027 were selected as the suitable strains for GABA production. The conditions of the carbon and nitrogen sources were determined as 5 g/l glucose (L. plantarum SGL058), 5 g/l lactose (L. lactis SGL027), 10 g/l yeast extract (L. plantarum SGL058), and 20 g/l yeast extract (L. lactis SGL027) for GABA production. The cell growth, monitored by optical density at 600 nm, was 5.93 for L. plantarum SGL058. This value was higher than the 3.04 produced by L. lactis SGL027 at 36 h using a 5-L fermenter. The highest concentration of GABA produced was 546.7 ㎍/ml by L. plantarum SGL058 and 404.6 ㎍/ml by L. lactis SGL027, representing a GABA conversion efficiency of (%, w/w) of 4.0% and 3.4%, respectively. The fermentation profiles of L. plantarum SGL058 and L. lactis SGL027 provide a basis for the utilization of LAB in GABA production using a basal synthetic medium.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No.2019R1G1A1007247).

참고문헌

  1. Leroy F, Vuyst LD. 2004. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 15: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004
  2. Diana M, Quilez J, Rafecas M. 2014. Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a bioactive compound in foods: a review. J. Funct. Foods. 10: 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.07.004
  3. Wang Q, Liu X, Fu J, Wang S, Chen Y, Chang K, et al. 2018. Substrate sustained release-based high efficacy biosynthesis of GABA by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0919-6
  4. Oh SH, Kim SH, Moon YJ, Choi WG. 2002. Changes in the levels of γ-aminobutyric acid and some amino acids by application of a glutamic acid solution for the germination of brown rices. Korean J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17: 49-53.
  5. Clark G, O'Mahony S, Malone G, Dinan TG. 2007. An isocratic high performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of GABA and glutamate in discrete regions of the rodent brain. J. Neurosci. Methods 160: 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.09.006
  6. Barla F, Koyanagi T, Tokuda N, Matsui H, Katayama T, Kumagai H, et al. 2016. The γ-aminobutyric acid-producing ability under low pH conditions of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented foods of Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan, with a strong ability to produce ACE-inhibitory peptides. Biotechnol. Rep. 10: 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2016.04.002
  7. Ohmori T, Tahara M, Ohshima T. 2018. Mechanism of gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA) production by a lactic acid bacterium in yogurt-sake. Process Biochem. 74: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.08.030
  8. Irfan M, Nadeem M, Syed Q. 2014. One-factor-at-time (OFAT) optimization of xylanase production from Trichoderma viride-IR05 in solid-state fermentation. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 7: 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.04.004
  9. Wang Q, Liu X, Fu J, Wang S, Chen Y, Chang K, et al. 2018. Substrate sustained release-based high efficacy biosynthesis of GABA by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0919-6
  10. Kook MC, Cho SC. 2013. Production of GABA (gamma aminobutyric acid) by lactic acid bacteria. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33: 377-389. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.3.377
  11. Park SY, Kim KS, Lee MK, Lim SD. 2013. Physiological characteristics and GABA production of Lactobacillus plantarum K255 isolated from Kimchi. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33: 592-602.
  12. Shan Y, Man CX, Han X, Li L, Guo Y, Deng Y, et al. 2015. Evaluation of improved γ-aminobutyric acid production in yogurt using Lactobacillus plantarum NDC75017. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 98: 2138-2149. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8698
  13. Tajabadi N, Ebrahimpour A, Baradaran A, Rahim RA, Mahyudin NA, Manap MYA, et al. 2015. Optimization of γ-aminobutyric acid production by Lactobacillus plantarum Taj-Apis362 from honeybees. Molecules 20: 6654-6669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046654
  14. Di Cagno R, Mazzacane F, Rizzello CG, De Angelis M, Giuliani G, Meloni M, et al. 2010. Synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus plantarum DSM19463: Functional grape must beverage and dermatological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86: 731-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2370-4
  15. Zarei F, Nateghi I, Eshaghi MR, Abadi MET. 2018. Optimization of gamma-aminobutyric acid production in probiotics extracted from local dairy products in west region of Iran using MRS broth and whey protein media. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 5: 233-242.
  16. Wu CH, Hsueh YH, Kuo JM, Liu SJ. 2018. Characterization of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus brevis RK03 and efficient production of γ-aminobutyric acid in batch fermentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010143
  17. Cataldo PG, Villegas JM, de Giori GS, Saavedra L, Hebert EM. 2020. Enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production by Lactobacillus brevis CRL2013 based on carbohydrate fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 333: 108792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108792
  18. Choi SI, Lee JW, Park SM, Lee MY, Ji GE, Park MS, et al. 2006. Improvement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production using cell entrapment of Lactobacillus brevis GABA 057. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 562-568.
  19. Komatsuzaki N, Shima J, Kawamoto S, Momose H, Kimura T. 2005. Production of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Microbiol. 22: 497-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.002
  20. Cho YR, Chang JY, Chang HC. 2007. Production of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus buchneri isolated from Kimchi and its neuroprotective effect on neuronal cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17: 104-109.
  21. Lin Q. 2013. Submerged fermentation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus YS9 for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production. Braz. J. Microbiol. 44: 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000100028
  22. Cui Y, Miao K, Niyaphorn S, Qu X. 2020. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid from lactic acid bacteria: a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21: 995-1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030995
  23. Hwang EY, Park JY. 2020. Isolation and characterization of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing lactic acid bacteria from Kimchi. Curr. Top. Lact. Acid Bact. Probiotics 6: 64-69. https://doi.org/10.35732/ctlabp.2020.6.2.64