DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Individual Factors on Safety Behavior of Aircraft Maintenance Technician

개인적인 요인이 항공정비사의 안전행동에 미치는 영향

  • 윤희석 (한국항공대학교 항공경영학과, 극동대학교 항공정비학과) ;
  • 박진우 (한국항공대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2021.10.08
  • Accepted : 2021.10.20
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

As the domestic aviation industry grows, the aviation maintenance field is also growing rapidly. This change calls for more aircraft maintenance technicians, and interest in safety accidents is also increasing. Individual safety climate indicates the importance of safety in the organization. We expect that three individual factors (training effectiveness, procedure effectiveness, and work pressure) relate to safety behavior in the workplace via individual safety climate. The purpose of this research is investigating the relationship between individual factors and aircraft maintenance technician's safety behavior. Previous studies related to individual factors were examined for literature review. Based on the previous studies, research model was constructed. Hypothesis was verified by effected data from 305 samples were employed for final survey. The results show that individual factors were meaningful factors to effect perceived safety behavior, and safety knowledge & safety motivation were related to safety compliance & safety participation.

Keywords

References

  1. MOLIT(Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport), "Integrated Aviation Safety Information System.", Available: https://www.esky.go.kr/, accessed on 2 Sept. 2021).
  2. Chen, C., and Chen, S., "Scale development of safety management system evaluation for the airline industry", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 47, 2012, pp.177-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.012
  3. Leveson, N., "A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 136, 2015, pp.17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.008
  4. Burke, M. J., Salvador, R. O., Smith-Crowe, K., Chan-Serafin, S., Smith, A., and Sonesh, S., "The dread factor: How hazards and safety training influence learning and performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 2011, pp.46-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021838
  5. DeJoy, D. M., Schaffer, B. S., Wilson, M. G., Vandenberg, R. J., and Butts, M. M., "Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate", Journal of Safety Research, 35, 2004, pp.81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
  6. Huang, Y. H., Chen, P. Y., Krauss, A. D., andRogers, D. A., "Quality of the execution of corporate safety policies and employee safety outcomes: Assessing the moderating role of supervisor safety support and the mediating role of employee safety control", Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 2004, pp.483-506. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028448.01394.bf
  7. Griffin, M. A., and Neal, A., "Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 2000. pp.347-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  8. Choudhry, R. M., and Fang, D., "Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites", Safety Science, 46, 2008, pp.566-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
  9. Lee, H.-S. "The effect of organizational safetyclimate at air traffic controller's safety behavior", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Flight Operation, 27(1), 2019, pp.10-19. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2019.27.1.010
  10. Silva, S., Lima, M. L., and Baptista, C. "OSCI: an organizational and safety climate inventory", Safety Science, 42, 2004, pp.205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00043-2
  11. Kim, K. S., and Park, Y. S., "The effects of safety climate on safety behavior and accident", Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 2002, pp. 19-39.
  12. Kang, B.-S., "A study on the factors influencing safeness of work environment in construction worker", Master Thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Feb. 2012.
  13. Brondino, M., Silva, S. A., and Pasini, M. "Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link", Safety Science, 50, 2012, pp.1847-1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.010
  14. Stackhouse, M., and Turner, N. "How do organizational practices relate to perceived system safety effectiveness? Perceptions of safety climate and co-worker commitment to safety as workplace safety signals", Journal of Safety Research, 70, 2019, pp.59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.002
  15. Ha, S.-Y., Kim, S.-K., Son, S.-H., Ha, S.-G., and Son, K.-Y., "Safety perception level of workers in construction site according to NOSACQ-50", J. Korea Inst. Build. Constr., 17(6), 2017, pp.567-576. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.6.567
  16. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., and Hart, P. M., "The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior", Safety Science, 34, 2000, pp.99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
  17. Zohar, D., "The effect of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 2002, pp. 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.130
  18. Cooper, M. D., and Phillips, R. A., "Validationof a safety climate measure", Paper presented at the Occupational Psychology Conference of the British Psychological Society, 3, 1994.
  19. Griffin, M. A., and Neal, A., "Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 2000, pp.347-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  20. Zohar, D., "Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 1980, pp.96-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
  21. Brown, R. L., Holmes, H., "The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(6), 1986, pp.455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90019-9