한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제24권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1-13
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

빅데이터를 활용한 기후변화와 연계된 생태계서비스 연구 동향분석

Analysis of Research Trends of Ecosystem Service Related to Climate Change Using Big-data

  • 서자유 (서울시립대학교) ;
  • 최요한 (서울시립대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 백지원 (서울시립대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 김수경 (서울시립대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 김호걸 (청주대학교 조경도시계획전공) ;
  • 송원경 (단국대학교 환경원예조경학부) ;
  • 주우영 (국립생태원) ;
  • 박찬 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Seo, Ja-Yoo (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Choi, Yo-Han (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of University of Seoul) ;
  • Baek, Ji-Won (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Su-Kyoung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Gul (Dept. of Human Environment Design, Cheongju University) ;
  • Song, Won-Kyong (Department of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Joo, Woo-Yeong (National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Park, Chan (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.01
  • 심사 : 2021.12.08
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was performed to investigate the ecosystem service patterns in relation to climate change acceleration utilizing big data analysis. This study aimed to use big data analysis as one of the network of views to identify convergent thinking in two fields: climate change and ecosystem service. The keywords were analysed to ascertain if there were any differences in the perceiving problems, policy direction, climate change implications, and regional differences. In addition, we examined the research keywords of each continent, the centre of ecosystem service research, and the topics to be referred to in domestic research. The results of the analysis are as follows: First, the keyword centrality of climate change is similar to the detailed indicators of The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) regulations, content, and non-material ecosystem services. Second, the cross-analysis of terms in two journals showed a difference in value-oriented point; the Ecosystem Service Journal identified green infrastructure as having economic value, whereas the Climate Change Journal perceives water, forest, carbon, and biodiversity as management topics. The Climate Change Journal, but not the former, focuses on future predictions. Third, the analysis of the research topics according to continents showed that water and soil are closely related to the economy, and thus, play an important role in policy formulation. This disparity is due to differences in each continent's environmental characteristics, as well as economic and policy issues. This fact can be used to refer to the direction of research on ecosystem services in Korea. Consistent with the recent trend of expanding research regarding the impacts of climate change, it is necessary to study strategies to scientifically predict and respond to the negative effects of climate change.

키워드

과제정보

본 결과물은 국립생태원 '핵심 생태자산과 생태계서비스 가치 평가 및 보전방안 연구(NIE-전략연구-2021-03)'와 환경부 한국환경산업기술원 '생물다양성 위협 외래생물 관리 기술개발사업(2021002280002)'의 지원으로 작성되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. ESP, 2021. 3rd ESP Europe Conference 2021 Program Booklet.
  2. Joo WY.Ahn SE.Joo JC.Cho DG.Bahn.Jung JH and Hyun KH. 2019. Introduction and Application of Conceptual Framwork and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Applied Ecological Engineering. Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering. 6(1): 69-76
  3. Ministry of Environment. 2015. UN Sustainable Development Goals.
  4. Natural Resources Canada, 2021. Canada in a changing climate: National Issues Report
  5. Seddon, Nathalie, et al. 2020. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375.1794
  6. Sethi, M., Lamb, W., Minx, J., & Creutzig, F. 2020. Climate change mitigation in cities: a systematic scoping of case studies. Environmental Research Letters: 15(9), 093008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab99ff
  7. IPBES, 2018(a). The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa. Bonn, Germany.
  8. IPBES, 2018(b). The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for the Americas. Germany.
  9. IPBES, 2018(c). The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific. Germany.
  10. IPBES, 2018(d). Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Germany
  11. IPCC, 2014, Climate Change 2014-Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability : PartA: Global and Sectoral Aspects
  12. IPCC, 2019, Special Report on Climate Change and Land
  13. IPCC, 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers
  14. Ministry of Environment. 2020. Korean Climate Change Assessment Report 2020.
  15. Runting, R. K., Bryan, B. A., Dee, L. E., Maseyk, F. J., Mandle, L., Hamel, P. & Rhodes, J. R.. 2017. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review. Global change biology. 23(1): 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13457
  16. Rahiem, M. M. A. 2019. Text Mining and Citation Network of Ecosystem Services Publications.
  17. Dayeen, F. R., Sharma, A. S., & Derrible, S. 2020. A text mining analysis of the climate change literature in industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(2): 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12998
  18. Iroy J. 2017. Effects of habitat disturbance on tropical forest biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23): 6056-6061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611855114
  19. Jung YR and Kang JE. 2019. Analysis of Social Big Data to Support the Development of Climate Change Policy. Journal Of Environmental Policy And Administration. 27(4): 211-239. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2019.27.4.211
  20. Jung JH.Choi YE.Moon JY and Park MN, 2019. Analysis on the Public Awareness of Weather Phenomena in the Context of Climate Change or Global Warming in the Republic of Korea Using Big Data. Journal of Climate Research. 14(4): 245-258 https://doi.org/10.14383/cri.2019.14.4.245
  21. Song IO and Song DS. 2020. Responding to Climate Change Thought The Application of New Technologies and Improved Legislation. Hannam Journal of Law&Technology. 26(3): 99-136
  22. Park JY and Jo DI. 2015. A conceptual framework assessing economic impacts stemming from disasters in Korea. Journal of Governance Studies 10(1): 17-39 https://doi.org/10.16973/jgs.2015.10.1.002
  23. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 2018. Fourth National Climate Assessment. Global Change Research Program 2018
  24. Kim JW. 2021. Sustainable Development Strategies in Asian Countries: The Water-Energy-Food Security
  25. Nexus. The Journal of Eurasian Studies. 18(3): 179-211 https://doi.org/10.31203/AEPA.2021.18.3.008
  26. Woo HS. 2020. Typological System of Nature-based Solutions and Its Similar Concepts on Water Management. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure. 7(1): 15-25 https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2020.7.1.015
  27. National Institute of Ecology. 2016. Korea National Ecosystem Assessment.
  28. Sammut-Bonnici, T., & Galea, D. 2015. PEST analysis.
  29. TEEB DE, 2016. Ecosystem services in rural areas.
  30. http://ipbes.net
  31. https://www.espconference.org
  32. http://sciencedirect.com
  33. http://springer.com