Nutrition Research and Practice

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumer acceptance of edible insect foods: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior

  • Bae, Yunjeong (Department of Foodservice Management, Woosong University) ;
  • Choi, Jinkyung (Department of Foodservice Management, Woosong University)
  • Received : 2019.06.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.06
  • Published : 2021.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure consumer acceptance of edible insect foods (EIFs) while applying the extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB). Insects as food have attracted interest as potential possible sources of nutrition for the future. This study investigated consumers' perception toward insect food and future purchase behaviors. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A survey was conducted among citizens of Korea. About two thirds of respondents had tried an EIF previously, and the mean value for food neophobia was 3.1 on a 5-point Likert scale. Respondents were divided into 2 groups of those experienced with EIFs and those not and by level of food neophobia. An independent t-test, multiple regression and descriptive analyses were conducted on the data. RESULTS: The primary reason for not eating EIFs was that their insect form induced disgust. Comparisons of ETPB attributes by experience with EIFs showed significant differences between groups for food neophobia, subjective norm, attitude, and behavioral intention. In addition, significant differences were found for subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, attitude, and behavioral intention between 2 neophobia groups. Finally, the results of measuring the relationships between ETPB attributes and behavioral intention showed only subjective norm and attitude affected behavioral intention. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that enhanced subjective norms producing a publicly accepted EIFs environment would help encourage the purchase of EIFs. The results of this study can help the development of EIF products for future food markets.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research is based support of "Woosong University Academic Research Funding".

References

  1. Verkerk MC, Tramper J, van Trijp JC, Martens DE. Insect cells for human food. Biotechnol Adv 2007;25:198-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.004
  2. Harris M. Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. New York: Waveland Press; 1998.
  3. LaMotte S. The food that can feed and maybe save, the planet: bugs [Internet]. Atlanta: CNN; 2019 [cited 2020 April 22]. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/25/health/insects-feed-save-planet-wellness/index.html.
  4. Piha S, Pohjanheimo T, Lahteenmaki-Uutela A, Kreckova Z, Otterbring T. The effects of consumer knowledge on the willingness to buy insect food: an exploratory cross-regional study in Northern and Central Europe. Food Qual Prefer 2018;70:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.006
  5. Tabassum-Abbasi , Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Reducing the global environmental impact of livestock production: the mini livestock option. J Clean Prod 2016;112:1754-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.094
  6. Bukkens S. The nutritional value of edible insects. Ecol Food Nutr 1997;36:287-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1997.9991521
  7. Schwartz GE, Weinberger DA, Singer JA. Cardiovascular differentiation of happiness, sadness, anger, and fear following imagery and exercise. Psychosom Med 1981;43:343-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198108000-00007
  8. Pliner P, Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 1992;19:105-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-W
  9. Pliner P, Pelchat M, Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite 1993;20:111-23. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1993.1013
  10. Jaeger SR, Rasmussen MA, Prescott J. Relationships between food neophobia and food intake and preferences: findings from a sample of New Zealand adults. Appetite 2017;116:410-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.030
  11. Tuorila H, Lahteenmaki L, Pohjalainen L, Lotti L. Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Qual Prefer 2001;12:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00025-2
  12. Tan HS, Fischer AR, Van Trijp HC, Stieger M. Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Qual Prefer 2016;48:293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.001
  13. Hartmann C, Siegrist M. Becoming an insectivore: results of an experiment. Food Qual Prefer 2016;51:118-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.003
  14. Choe JY, Cho MS. Food neophobia and willingness to try non-traditional food for Koreans. Food Qual Prefer 2011;22:671-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.05.002
  15. Verbeke W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual Prefer 2015;39:147-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
  16. Wu K, Raab C, Chang W, Krishen A. Understanding Chinese tourists' food consumption in the United States. J Bus Res 2016;69:4706-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.018
  17. Chen M. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Qual Prefer 2007;18:1008-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004
  18. Meiselman HL, King SC, Gillette M. The demographics of neophobia in a large commercial US sample. Food Qual Prefer 2010;21:893-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.009
  19. Pliner P, Pelchat ML. Neophobia in humans and the special status of foods of animal origin. Appetite 1991;16:205-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(91)90059-2
  20. Hursti UkK , Sjoden P. Food and general neophobia and their relationship with self-reported food choice: familial resemblance in Swedish families with children of ages 7-17 years. Appetite 1997;29:89-103. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1997.0108
  21. Nicklaus S. The role of food experiences during early childhood in food pleasure learning. Appetite 2016;104:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.022
  22. Schwartz C, Scholtens P, Lalanne A, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite 2011;157:796-807.
  23. Nicklaus S, Demonteil L, Tournier C. Modifying the texture of foods for infants and young children. In: Chen J, Rosenthal A, editors. Modifying Food Texture, Volume 2: Sensory Analysis, Consumer Requirements and Preferences. London: Woodhead; 2015. p.187-222.
  24. Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D'Udine B, Foley RA, et al. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 2004;430:419-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02725
  25. Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, Halford JC. Food neophobia and 'picky/fussy' eating in children: a review. Appetite 2007;50:181-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.009
  26. Kallas Z, Vitale M, Gil JM. Health innovation in patty products. The role of food neophobia in consumers' non-hypothetical willingness to pay, purchase intention and hedonic evaluation. Nutrients 2019;11:E444.
  27. Korsmeyer C, Sutton D. The sensory experience of food. Food Cult Soc 2011;14:461-75. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174411X13046092851316
  28. Dacremont C, Sester C. Context in food behavior and product experience - a review. Curr Opin Food Sci 2019;27;115-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2019.07.007
  29. Rotter JB. Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. J Consult Clin Psychol 1975;43:56-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076301
  30. Norman P, Brain K. An application of an extended health belief model to the prediction of breast self-examination among women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Health Psychol 2005;10:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910704X24752
  31. Russell CA, Buhrau D. The role of television viewing and direct experience in predicting adolescents' beliefs about the health risks of fast-food consumption. Appetite 2015;92:200-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.023
  32. Garber LL Jr, Hyatt EM, Starr RG Jr. Measuring consumer response to food products. Food Qual Prefer 2003;14:3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00030-7
  33. Fallon AE, Rozin P. The psychological bases of food rejections by humans. Ecol Food Nutr 1983;13:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1983.9990728
  34. Gere A, Székely G, Kovács S, Kókai Z, Sipos L. Readiness to adopt insects in Hungary: a case study. Food Qual Prefer 2017;59:81-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.005
  35. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
  36. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  37. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986;22:453-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
  38. Batra R, Ahtola OT. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Mark Lett 1991;2:159-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035
  39. Fazio RH, Chen JM, McDonel EC, Sherman SJ. Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency and the strength of the object-evaluation association. J Exp Soc Psychol 1982;18:339-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90058-0
  40. Brunso K, Scholderer J, Grunert KG. Closing the gap between values and behavior - a means-end theory of lifestyle. J Bus Res 2004;57:665-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00310-7
  41. Shin YH, Hancer M. The role of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm in the intention to purchase local food products. J Foodserv Bus Res 2016;19:338-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2016.1181506
  42. Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students' intention to purchase organic food. J Clean Prod 2015;107:342-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071
  43. Mirkarimi K, Eri M, Ghanbari MR, Kabir MJ, Raeisi M, Ozouni-Davaji RB, Aryaie M, Charkazi A. Modifying attitude and intention toward regular physical activity using protection motivation theory: a randomized controlled trial. East Mediterr Health J 2017;23:543-50. https://doi.org/10.26719/2017.23.8.543
  44. Qamar Z, McIntosh A, Hicks K. Improved perceived behavioral control in choosing fruits and vegetables as a result of the online nutrition program for South Asians. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117:A58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.173
  45. Chen M. Modeling an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict intention to take precautions to avoid consuming food with additives. Food Qual Prefer 2017;58:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.01.002
  46. Arvola A, Vassallo M, Dean M, Lampila P, Saba A, Lahteenmaki L, Shepherd R. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 2008;50:443-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.010
  47. Menozzi G, Sogari C, Mora D. Explaining vegetable consumption among young adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Nutrients 2015;7:7633-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7095357
  48. McNeil K, Kelly F, McNeil J. Testing Research Hypotheses Using Multiple Linear Regression. Carbondale: South Illinois University Press; 1975.
  49. Nusair K, Hua N. Comparative assessment of structural equation modeling and multiple regression research methodologies: E-commerce context. Tour Manage 2010;31:314-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.010
  50. Shaw D, Shiu E. Ethics in consumer choice: a multivariate modelling approach. Eur J Mark 2003;37:1485-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310487202