Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research (임상간호연구)

Hospital Nurses Association (병원간호사회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Validation of a Korean Nursing Work Environment Scale for Critical Care Nurses

한국형 중환자실 간호근무환경 측정도구 개발 및 평가

  • Received : 2021.09.27
  • Accepted : 2021.10.21
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a Korean nursing work environment scale for critical care nurses (KNWES-CCN) and verify its validity and reliability. Methods: A total of 46 preliminary items were selected using content validity analysis of experts on 64 candidate items derived through literature reviews and in-depth interviews with critical care nurses. 535 critical care nurses from 21 hospitals responded to the preliminary questionnaire from February to March 2021. The collected data were analysed using construct, convergent and discriminant validities, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The 23 items in 4 factors accounted for 55.6% of the total variance were identified through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFA was performed with maximum likelihood method including direct oblimin method. In the confirmatory factor analysis, KNWES-CCN consisted of 21 items in 4 factors by deleting the items that were not meet the condition that the factor loading over .50 or the squared multiple correlation over .30. This model was considered to be suitable because it satisfied the fit index and acceptable criteria of the model [𝒳2=440.47 (p<.001), CMIN/DF=2.41, GFI=.86, SRMR=.06, RMSEA=.07, TLI=.90, CFI=.91]. The item total correlation values ranged form .32 to .73 and its internal consistency was Cronbach's α=.92. The reliability of the test-retest correlation coefficient was .72 and the intra-class correlation coefficient was .83. Conclusion: The KNWES-CCN showed good validity and reliability. Therefore, it is expected that the use of this scale would measure and improve nursing work environment for critical care nurses in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2020년 병원간호사회에서 연구비를 지원받아 진행한 연구임.

References

  1. Hong KJ, Cho SH. Comparison of nursing workforce supply and employment in South Korea and other OECD countries. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2017;14(2):55-63. https://doi.org/10.16952/pns.2017.14.2.55
  2. Lin L, Liang BA. Addressing the nursing work environment to promote patient safety. Nursing Forum. 2007;42(1):20-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00062.x
  3. Copanitsanou P, Fotos N, Brokalaki H. Effects of work environment on patient and nurse outcomes. British Journal of Nursing. 2017;26(3):172-176. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.3.172
  4. Lake ET. Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Research in Nursing & Health. 2002; 25(3):176-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10032
  5. Lewis DJ, Robinson JA. ICU nurses' coping measures: Response to work-related stressors. Critical Care Nurse. 1992;12 (2):18-23. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn1992.12.2.18
  6. Espinosa L, Young A, Symes L, Haile B, Walsh T. ICU nurses' experiences in providing terminal care. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2010;33(3):273-281. https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181d91424
  7. Jeon KB, Park MH. Relationship of ICU nurses' difficulties in end-of-life care to moral distress, burnout and job satisfaction. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2019; 25(1):42-51. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.1.42
  8. Kramer M, Hafner LP. Shared values: Impact on staff nurse job satisfaction and perceived productivity. Nursing Research. 1989;38(3):172-177. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198905000-00019
  9. Aiken LH, Patrician PA. Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: The revised nursing work index. Nursing Research. 2000;49(3):146-153. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200005000-00006
  10. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Development and evaluation of essentials of magnetism tool. Journal of Nursing Adiministration. 2004;34(7-8):365-378. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200407000-00010
  11. Ulrich BT, Lavandero R, Hart KA, Woods D, Leggett J, Taylor D. Critical care nurses' work environments: A baseline status report. Critical Care Nurse. 2006;26(5):46-57. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2006.26.5.46
  12. Cho EH, Choi MN, Kim EY, Yoo IY, Lee NJ. Construct validity and reliability of the Korean version of the practice environment scale of nursing work index for Korean nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2011;41(3):325-332. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.325
  13. Park SH, Kang JY. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Korean nursing work environment scale. Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing. 2015;8(1):50-61.
  14. Jo SO, Oh JA. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of a tool to measure uncivil behavior in clinical nursing education. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2016;22(4):537-548. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.4.537
  15. Park HS, Gang EH. A study on job stress and the coping of ICU nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2007;37(5):810-821. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2007.37.5.810
  16. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Research in Nursing & Health. 2007;30(4):459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  17. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1998;1(1):104-121. https://doi.org/10.117/109442819800100106
  18. Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
  19. Myers ND, Ahn S, Jin Y. Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: A Monte Carlo approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2011;82(3):412-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599773
  20. Yu JP. The concept and understanding of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hannare Publishing Co.; 2012.
  21. Kang HC. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(5):587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  22. Song JJ. SPSS/AMOS statistic analysis methods. 2nd ed. Seoul: 21cbook Publishing Co.; 2013. p. 387-400.
  23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  24. Jahng SM. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis for the development of the Likert-type scale. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2015;34(4):1079-1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12304
  25. Seo WJ, Lee SM, Kim JJ. Exploratory factor analysis in psychological research: Current status and suggestions for methodological improvements. Journal of Social Science. 2018;29(1): 177-193. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.01.29.1.177
  26. Ko YJ. Development and evaluation of nursing work environment scale of clinical nurses (NWES-CN) [Dissertation]. Seoul.: Hanyang University; 2019. p. 1-148.
  27. Kim JK, Kim SY, Yu M, Kim MJ, Lee KA. Korean work environment scales for clinical nurses. Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 2015;12(1):54-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12048
  28. Choi JS, Boyle DK. Differences in nursing practice environment among US acute care unit types: A descriptive study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2014;51(11):1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.001
  29. Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. The effects of nurse staffing and nurse education on patient deaths in hospitals with different nurse work environments. Medical Care. 2011;49(12):1047. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000420390.87789.67
  30. Lee JH, Song YS. Mixed method research investigating turnover intension with ICU nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2020;27(2):153-163. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.2.153