Journal of Public Diplomacy

The Korean Association for Public Diplomacy (한국공공외교학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

When Diplomats Go MAD: How the Crisis Framing of Ministries of Foreign Affairs Results in Mutually Assured Delegitimization

  • Received : 2021.07.04
  • Accepted : 2021.11.26
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study argues that scholars lack an adequate conceptualization of the strategic use of social media framing by Ministries of Foreign Affairs (MFAs) during crises. As a theoretical starting point, this article employs the concept of soft disempowerment to suggest that MFAs may use online framing to limit an adversary's range of possible actions during a crisis by depicting that adversary as violating norms and values deemed desirable by the international community. Next, the article introduces the concept of mutually assured delegitimization (MAD), which suggests that actors may call into question one another's adherence with certain norms and values during crises, which results in the mutual depletion of soft power resources. Importantly, this article proposes a novel, methodological approach for the analysis of individual tweets during crises. To illustrate its methodological and conceptual innovations, the study analyzes tweets published by the MFAs of the United States (US) and Russia during the Crimea crisis and demonstrates that both MFAs used Twitter to negatively frame each other by calling their morals into question, which resulted in MAD.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to acknowledge the support of the Azrielli International Postdoctoral Fellowship

References

  1. Avraham, E. (2009). Marketing and managing nation branding during prolonged crisis: The case of Israel. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(3), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2009.15
  2. Acuto, M. (2011). Diplomats in crisis. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 22(3), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2011.599661
  3. Bell, C. (1971). The conventions of crisis: A study in diplomatic management. Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  4. Bjola, C. (2017, November 5). Digital diplomacy 2.0 pushes the boundary. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1073667.shtml
  5. Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Routledge
  6. Bjola, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of the Digital Diplomatic Strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China. In C. Bjola. & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice (pp. 71-88). Routledge.
  7. Boin, A., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2016). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Cahill, K. M. (Ed.). (2006). Preventive diplomacy: stopping wars before they start. Routledge.
  9. Causey, C., & Howard, P. N. (2013). Delivering Digital Public Diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift (pp. 144-56). Routledge.
  10. Clark, I. (2003). Legitimacy in a global order. Review of International Studies, 29(S1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503005904
  11. Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(2), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5
  12. Cull, N. J., (2018)., 'The Long Road to Digitalized Diplomacy: A Short History of the Internet in US Public Diplomacy', Revista Mexicana de Politica Exterior, 113 (2018), 1-15.
  13. Dafoe, A., Zwetsloot, R., & Cebul, M. (2021). Reputations for Resolve and Higher-Order Beliefs in crisis Bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002721995549
  14. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information design journal & document design, 13(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
  15. Diehl, P. F., Reifschneider, J., & Hensel, P. R. (1996). United Nations intervention and recurring conflict. International Organization, 50(4), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033555
  16. Duncombe, C. (2017). Twitter and transformative diplomacy: social media and Iran-US relations. International Affairs, 93(3), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix048
  17. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
  18. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  19. Fedotov, E. (2015). Weak language norm (s) versus domestic interests: Why Ukraine behaves the way it does. Review of International Studies, 41(4), 739-755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000448
  20. Freedman, L. (2014). Ukraine and the art of crisis management. Survival, 56(3), 7-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.920143
  21. Garrison, J. A. (2001). Framing foreign policy alternatives in the inner circle: President Carter, his advisors, and the struggle for the arms control agenda. Political Psychology, 22(4), 775-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00262
  22. Gilboa, E. (2005). The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political communication, 22(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908429
  23. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  24. Hayden, C. (2012). Social Media at State: Power, Practice, and Conceptual Limits for US Public Diplomacy. Global Media Journal-American Edition, 11(21).
  25. Ish-Shalom, P. (2015). King diplomacy for perpetual crisis. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341301
  26. Jacobs, L. R., & Page, B. I. (2005). Who influences US foreign policy?. American political science review, 99(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505152X
  27. Kassab, H. S. (2014). In search of cyber stability: international relations, mutually assured destruction and the age of cyber warfare. In J. Kremer & B. Muller (Eds.) Cyberspace and International Relations (pp. 59-76). Springer.
  28. Khatib, L., Dutton, W., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Case Study of the US Digital Outreach Team. The Middle East Journal, 66(3), 453-72. https://doi.org/10.3751/66.3.14
  29. Khong, Y. F. (2019). Power as prestige in world politics. International Affairs, 95(1), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy245
  30. Kostyuk, N., & Zhukov, Y. M. (2019). Invisible digital front: Can cyber attacks shape battlefield events?. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(2), 317-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717737138
  31. Layne, C. (2018). The US-Chinese power shift and the end of the Pax Americana. International Affairs, 94(1), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix249
  32. Manor, I. (2019). The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Manor, I., & Holmes, M. (2018). Palestine in Hebrew: Overcoming the limitations of traditional diplomacy, Revista Politicia Exterior, 113 (2018), 538-574.
  34. Manor, I., & Crilley, R. (2018). Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel ministry of foreign affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict, 11(4), 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635218780564
  35. Manor, I., & Crilley, R. (2018). The aesthetics of violent extremist and counter-violent extremist communication. In C. Bjola & J. Pamment (Eds.), Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism (pp. 121-139). Routledge.
  36. Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). America's Selfie: How the US Portrays Itself on its Social Media Accounts. In C. Bjola. & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice (pp. 89-108). Routledge.
  37. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of communication, 58(2), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
  38. Metzgar, E. T. (2012). Is it the Medium or the Message? Social Media, American Public Relations & Iran. Global Media Journal, 1-16.
  39. Millett, P. (2013, January 30). Syria: Stepping up to the Plate. FCO Blog Site. https://blogs.fcdo.gov.uk/petermillett/2013/01/30/syria-stepping-up-to-the-plate/
  40. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2014). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge.
  41. Natarajan, K. (2014). Digital public diplomacy and a strategic narrative for India. Strategic Analysis, 38(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.863478
  42. Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft power: the evolution of a concept. Journal of Political Power, 14(1), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879572
  43. Nye Jr, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Hachette.
  44. Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign policy, (80), 153-171.
  45. NATO StratCom. (2014, October 5). Analysis of Russia's information campaign against Ukraine. Executive Summary. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/analysis-of-russias-information-campaign-against-ukraine-executive-summary/150
  46. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political communication, 10(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
  47. Pew Research Center. (2018, October 10). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/09/10/news-use-acrosssocial-media-platforms-2018/
  48. Pew Research Center. (2021, January 12). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2020. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/09/10/news-use-acrosssocial-media-platforms-2018/
  49. Pruce, D. (2018, April 17). Does Russia support the rules based international system at all?. FCO Blog Site. https://blogs.fcdo.gov.uk/danielpruce/2018/04/17/does-russia-supportthe-rules-based-international-system-at-all/
  50. Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2009). Can brand Obama rescue brand America?. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16(1), 163-178.
  51. Richardson, J. L. (1988). New insights on international crises. Review of International Studies, 14(4), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113191
  52. Seib, P. (2012). Real-time diplomacy: Politics and power in the social media era. Palgrave Macmillan.
  53. Seib, P. (2016). The future of diplomacy. Polity Press.
  54. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
  55. The Economic Times. (2013, July 30). External affairs ministry launches smartphone app for iOS and Android users. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/software/external-affairs-ministry-launches-smartphone-app-for-ios-and-androidusers/articleshow/21472490.cms?from=mdr
  56. Van Ham, P. (2013). Social Power in Public Diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift (pp. 17-28). Routledge.
  57. Wright, K. A. (2019). Telling NATO's story of Afghanistan: Gender and the alliance's digital diplomacy. Media, War & Conflict, 12(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635217730588
  58. Xiguang, L., & Jing, W. (2010). Web-based public diplomacy: The role of social media in the Iranian and Xinjiang riots. Journal of International Communication, 16(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2010.9674756
  59. Yang, J. (2003). Framing the NATO air strikes on Kosovo across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 65(3), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549203065003002
  60. Zeitzoff, T. (2017). How social media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9), 1970-1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717721392
  61. Zelikow, P., & Allison, G. T. (1999). Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile crisis. Longman.
  62. Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of communication, 57(1), 79. doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00330.x