References
- Kim H and Kim JS (2014) A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 15, 321-334 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3686
- Lee SH, Park YH, Jin YB, Kim SU and Hur JK (2020) CRISPR diagnosis and therapeutics with single base pair precision. Trends Mol Med 26, 337-350 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.09.008
- Wright AV, Nunez JK and Doudna JA (2016) Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature's toolbox for genome engineering. Cell 164, 29-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035
- Hsu PD, Lander ES and Zhang F (2014) Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262-1278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010
- Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA and Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
- Lee SH, Kim S and Hur JK (2018) CRISPR and Target-specific DNA endonucleases for efficient DNA knock-in in eukaryotic genomes. Mol Cells 41, 943-952 https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.0408
- Tsai SQ and Joung JK (2016) Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 17, 300-312 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.28
- Yen ST, Zhang M, Deng JM et al (2014) Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes. Dev Biol 393, 3-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.06.017
- Midic U, Hung PH, Vincent KA et al (2017) Quantitative assessment of timing, efficiency, specificity and genetic mosaicism of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of hemoglobin beta gene in rhesus monkey embryos. Hum Mol Genet 26, 2678-2689 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx154
- Lamas-Toranzo I, Galiano-Cogolludo B, Cornudella-Ardiaca F, Cobos-Figueroa J, Ousinde O and Bermejo-Alvarez P (2019) Strategies to reduce genetic mosaicism following CRISPR-mediated genome edition in bovine embryos. Sci Rep 9, 14900 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51366-8
- Mehravar M, Shirazi A, Nazari M and Banan M (2019) Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Dev Biol 445, 156-162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.10.008
- Yeh CD, Richardson CD and Corn JE (2019) Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways. Nat Cell Biol 21, 1468-1478 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0425-z
- Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M et al (2016) ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D862-868 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1222
- Rees HA, Yeh WH and Liu DR (2019) Development of hRad51-Cas9 nickase fusions that mediate HDR without double-stranded breaks. Nat Commun 10, 2212 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09983-4
- Ling X, Xie B, Gao X et al (2020) Improving the efficiency of precise genome editing with site-specific Cas9-oligonucleotide conjugates. Sci Adv 6, eaaz0051 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz0051
- Yu Y, Guo Y, Tian Q et al (2020) An efficient gene knockn strategy using 5'odified double-stranded DNA donors with short homology arms. Nat Chem Biol 16, 387-390 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0432-1
- Nguyen DN, Roth TL, Li PJ et al (2020) Polymer-stabilized Cas9 nanoparticles and modified repair templates increase genome editing efficiency. Nat Biotechnol 38, 44-49 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0325-6
- Egli D, Zuccaro MV, Kosicki M, Church GM, Bradley A and Jasin M (2018) Inter-homologue repair in fertilized human eggs? Nature 560, E5-E7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0379-5
- Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA and Liu DR (2016) Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420-424 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17946
- Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA et al (2017) Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464-471 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24644
- Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR et al (2019) Searchnd-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149-157 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4
- Komor AC, Zhao KT, Packer MS et al (2017) Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Sci Adv 3, eaao4774 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao4774
- Zafra MP, Schatoff EM, Katti A et al (2018) Optimized base editors enable efficient editing in cells, organoids and mice. Nat Biotechnol 36, 888-893 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4194
- Koblan LW, Doman JL, Wilson C et al (2018) Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol 36, 843-846 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4172
- Kurt IC, Zhou R, Iyer S et al (2021) CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 39, 41-46 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0609-x
- Kim J, Malashkevich V, Roday S, Lisbin M, Schramm VL and Almo SC (2006) Structural and kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli TadA, the wobble-specific tRNA deaminase. Biochemistry 45, 6407-6416 https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0522394
- Richter MF, Zhao KT, Eton E et al (2020) Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat Biotechnol 38, 883-891 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z
- Ryu SM, Koo T, Kim K et al (2018) Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Biotechnol 36, 536-539 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4148
- Lee HK, Willi M, Miller SM et al (2018) Targeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos. Nat Commun 9, 4804 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07322-7
- Rees HA, Wilson C, Doman JL and Liu DR (2019) Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors. Sci Adv 5, eaax5717 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5717
- Kim YB, Komor AC, Levy JM, Packer MS, Zhao KT and Liu DR (2017) Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nat Biotechnol 35, 371-376 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3803
- Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH et al (2018) Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556, 57-63 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26155
- Huang TP, Zhao KT, Miller SM et al (2019) Circularly permuted and PAM-modified Cas9 variants broaden the targeting scope of base editors. Nat Biotechnol 37, 626-631 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0134-y
- Walton RT, Christie KA, Whittaker MN and Kleinstiver BP (2020) Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290-296 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8853
- Li X, Wang Y, Liu Y et al (2018) Base editing with a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 36, 324-327 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4102
- Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS et al (2016) High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genomewide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490-495 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16526
- Rees HA, Komor AC, Yeh WH et al (2017) Improving the DNA specificity and applicability of base editing through protein engineering and protein delivery. Nat Commun 8, 15790 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15790
- Kim S, Kim D, Cho SW, Kim J and Kim JS (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res 24, 1012-1019 https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.171322.113
- Gehrke JM, Cervantes O, Clement MK et al (2018) An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities. Nat Biotechnol 36, 977-982 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4199
- Yeh WH, Chiang H, Rees HA, Edge ASB and Liu DR (2018) In vivo base editing of post-mitotic sensory cells. Nat Commun 9, 2184 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04580-3
- Lee HK, Willi M, Smith HE et al (2019) Simultaneous targeting of linked loci in mouse embryos using base editing. Sci Rep 9, 1662 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33533-5
- Zong Y, Wang Y, Li C et al (2017) Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35, 438-440 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3811
- Hua K, Tao X, Yuan F, Wang D and Zhu JK (2018) Precise A.T to G.C base editing in the rice genome. Mol Plant 11, 627-630 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007
- Ma Y, Zhang J, Yin W, Zhang Z, Song Y and Chang X (2016) Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 13, 1029-1035 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4027
- Hess GT, Fresard L, Han K et al (2016) Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 13, 1036-1042 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4038
- Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C et al (2020) Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol 38, 582-585 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x
- Surun D, Schneider A, Mircetic J et al (2020) Efficient generation and correction of mutations in human iPS cells utilizing mRNAs of CRISPR base editors and prime editors. Genes (Basel) 11, 511 https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050511
- Liu Y, Li X, He S et al (2020) Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system. Cell Discov 6, 27 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0165-z
- Clement K, Rees H, Canver MC et al (2019) CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol 37, 224-226 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3