DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective institutional study of human age determination by evaluating the pulp length and width ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor on panoramic radiographs in Indonesian subjects

  • Received : 2021.05.10
  • Accepted : 2021.07.15
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The pulp length to width (PL/W) ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor can be used as an age determination method. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the PL/W ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor on panoramic radiographs and human chronological age in Indonesian subjects. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed with 134 maxillary lateral incisors on 113 panoramic radiographs from patients who visited the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Unit of Dental Hospital Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, from 2013 to 2018 (age range: between 11 to 60 years). The pulp length was measured from the pulp chamber roof to the apical foramen, and the pulp width was measured on the cervical area of the cementoenamel junction in millimeters using Fiji ImageJ open-source software. Simple linear regression (in SPSS) was used to analyze the results. The reliability of the observers was evaluated. Results: The PL/W ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor was significantly correlated with chronological age (P<0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the PL/W ratio between the left and right maxillary lateral incisors(P=0.333). There was a very strong correlation (r=0.939) between the PL/W ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor and human chronological age, with the following formula: age= -3.057+1.875×PL/W ratio (R2=0.882, standard error of estimate: 4.659). Conclusion: The PL/W ratio of the maxillary lateral incisor on panoramic radiograph can be used for age determination in Indonesian subjects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We would like to express special thanks to Dr. Marry Siti Mariam, drg., M.Kes., Dr. Endah Mardiati, drg., MS., Sp.Ort (K), and Nani Murniati, drg., M.Kes., who gave the advice in completing this study. We also acknowledge the oral and maxillofacial radiology and forensic odontology staff of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.

References

  1. Anugrahadi A, Sumotarto U, Purwiyono TT. Geomorphological impact of Palu earthquake. J Phys Conf Ser 2019; 1402: 033015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033015
  2. Kusumayudha SB, Lestari P, Paripurno ET. Eruption characteristic of the sleeping volcano, Sinabung, North Sumatera, Indonesia, and SMS gateway for disaster early warning system. Indones J Geogr 2018; 50: 70-7. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.17574
  3. Zikir A, Manica S. Forensic dentistry and disaster victim identification (DVI) in Indonesia. Aust J Forensic Sci 2019; 53: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1661513
  4. Kanchan-Talreja P, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. An assessment of the versatility of Kvaal's method of adult dental age estimation in Indians. Arch Oral Biol 2012; 57: 277-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.020
  5. Divakar KP. Forensic odontology: the new dimension in dental analysis. Int J Biomed Sci 2017; 13: 1-5.
  6. Kumar R, Athota A, Rastogi T, Karumuri SK. Forensic radiology: an emerging tool in identification. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015; 27: 416-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.170478
  7. Prajapati G, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Shelke P, Awan KH, Patil S. Role of forensic odontology in the identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: a systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0199791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199791
  8. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental evidence in forensic identification - an overview, methodology and present status. Open Dent J 2015; 9: 250-6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010250
  9. Panchbhai AS. Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2011; 40: 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/19478385
  10. Karkhanis S, Mack P, Franklin D. Age estimation standards for a Western Australian population using the coronal pulp cavity index. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 231: 412.e1-6.
  11. Uzuner FD, Kaygisiz E, Darendeliler N. Defining dental age for chronological age determination. In: Dogan KH. Post mortem examination and autopsy-current issues from death to laboratory analysis. London: IntechOpen; 2017. p. 77-95.
  12. Ellingham S, Adserias-Garriga J. Complexities and considerations of human age estimation. In: Adserias-Garriga J. Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2019. p. 1-15.
  13. de las Heras SM. Dental age estimation in adults. In: AdseriasGarriga J. Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2019. p. 125-40.
  14. Erbudak HO, Ozbek M, Uysal S, Karabulut E. Application of Kvaal et al.'s age estimation method to panoramic radiographs from Turkish individuals. Forensic Sci Int 2012; 219: 141-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.012
  15. Solheim T. Amount of secondary dentin as an indicator of age. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 193-9.
  16. Oscandar F, Rojiun ZA, Ibrahim N, Supian S, Tharmalingam D, Malinda Y. Preliminary research: correlation between pulp chamber volume of mandibular first molar and chronological age on deuteromalay subrace. Int J Med Toxicol Leg Med 2018; 21: 34-6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4614.2018.00023.2
  17. Rieuwpassa IE, Alfian AA, Hasyim R. Age estimation based on dental panoramic radiography overview with coronal pulp cavity index (CPCI) methods. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2020; 29: 8872-9.
  18. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 1995; 74: 175-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-G
  19. Indira AP, Shashikala R, Nagaraj T, Santosh HN. Age estimation of adults using dental pulp: a cross-sectional radiographic study. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2015; 2: 131-4. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jcri.61
  20. Yeung AW, Mozos I. The innovative and sustainable use of dental panoramic radiographs for the detection of osteoporosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 2449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072449
  21. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014.
  22. Ramos BC, da Silva Izar BR, Pereira JLC, Souza PS, Valerio CS, Tuji FM, et al. Formation of ghost images due to metal objects on the surface of the patient's face: a pictorial essay. Imaging Sci Dent 2016; 46: 63-8. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.1.63
  23. Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Robinson S. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights Imaging 2015; 6: 1-16.
  24. Kayal RA. Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment. J Orthod Sci 2016; 5: 117-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.192113
  25. Limdiwala PG, Shah JS. Age estimation by using dental radiographs. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013; 5: 118-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.119778
  26. Li MJ, Chu G, Han MQ, Chen T, Zhou H, Guo YC. Application of the Kvaal method for age estimation using digital panoramic radiography of Chinese individuals. Forensic Sci Int 2019; 301: 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.015
  27. Zaher JF, Fawzy IA, Habib SR, Ali MM. Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary incisors among Egyptians using dental radiographic images. J Forensic Leg Med 2011; 18: 62-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.12.004
  28. Fancy SG. Preparation of mammalian teeth for age determination by cementum layers: a review. Wildl Soc Bull 1980; 8: 242-8.
  29. Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B. Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms- a contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med 2005; 119: 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0492-x
  30. Cameriere R, Cunha E, Wasterlain SN, De Luca S, Sassaroli E, Pagliara F, et al. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in lateral and central incisors by peri-apical X-ray. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20: 530-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.02.012
  31. Roh BY, Lee WJ, Ryu JW, Ahn JM, Yoon CL, Lee SS. The application of the Kvaal method to estimate the age of live Korean subjects using digital panoramic radiographs. Int J Legal Med 2018; 132: 1161-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1762-8
  32. Saini A, Garg A. Age estimation of an individual by pulp/tooth ratio by maxillary lateral incisor using periapical radiographs (RVG). Int J Forensic Odontol 2019; 4: 27-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_34_18
  33. Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Gungor E, Colak M. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 302-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137630
  34. Juneja M, Devi YB, Rakesh N, Juneja S. Age estimation using pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary canines- a digital image analysis. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6: 160-5.
  35. Penaloza TYM, Karkhanis S, Kvaal SI, Nurul F, Kanagasingam S, Franklin D, et al. Application of the Kvaal method for adult dental age estimation using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). J Forensic Leg Med 2016; 44: 178-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.10.013
  36. Rondon RH, Pereira YC, do Nascimento GC. Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: a review. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.1
  37. Ge ZP, Yang P, Li G, Zhang JZ, Ma XC. Age estimation based on pulp cavity/chamber volume of 13 types of tooth from cone beam computed tomography images. Int J Legal Med 2016; 130: 1159-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1384-6
  38. Akay G, Gungor K, Gurcan S. The applicability of Kvaal methods and pulp/tooth volume ratio for age estimation of the Turkish adult population on cone beam computed tomography images. Aust J Forensic Sci 2019; 51: 251-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1356872
  39. Hisham S, Abdullah N, Noor MH, Franklin D. Quantification of secondary dentin formation using dental orthopantomographs in a contemporary Malaysian population. Aust J Forensic Sci 2019; 51: S180-3.
  40. Villoria EM, Rodrigues RC, do Nascimento Pereira CH, Conceicao GS, Soares RV. The importance of digital radiographic systems in dental schools and oral radiology centers as part of reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Imaging Sci Dent 2021; 51: 91-2. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20200216
  41. Park JW, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC. Comparison of the reproducibility of panoramic radiographs between dentulous and edentulous patients. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 95-102. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.95
  42. Nikneshan S, Sharafi M, Emadi N. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions. Imaging Sci Dent 2013; 43: 191-6. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.3.191