Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical Consideration of Factor Analysis for the Assessment of Construct Validity

  • Park, Jin-Hee (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Jeung-Im (School of Nursing, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2021.12.08
  • Accepted : 2021.12.17
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Soonchunhyang University.

References

  1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Introduction to health measurement scales. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J, editors. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use [Internet]. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; c2015 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685219.003.0001.
  2. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Reporting test results. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J, editors. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use [Internet]. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; c2015 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685219.003.0015.
  3. American Psychological Association. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin. 1954;51(2:2):1-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053479
  4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. British Medical Journal. 2003;326(7379):41-44. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41
  5. Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(1):96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
  6. Choi CH, You YY. The study on the comparative analysis of EFA and CFA. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2017;15(10):103-111. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.103
  7. Marsh HW, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Kaur G. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2014;10:85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
  8. Seo W, Lee S, Kim M, Kim J. Exploratory factor analysis in psychological research: Current status and suggestions for methodological improvements. Journal of Social Science. 2018;29(1):177-193. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.01.29.1.177
  9. Brown JD. Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. 2009 November 13(3):20-25.
  10. Shin HJ. Accessing construct validity with factor analysis. Korean Policy Sciences Review. 2014;18(2):217-234.
  11. Park JH, Bae SH, Jung YS, Jung YM. The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive (FACT-Cog) in Korean patients with breast cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015;23(9):2695-2703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2632-x
  12. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
  13. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993. p. 136-162.
  14. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  15. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88(3):588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  16. Heo J. AMOS structural equation model that is easily followed. Seoul: Hannarae; 2013. p. 195-199.