Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphological variables restrict flower choice of Lycaenid butterfly species: implication for pollination and conservation

  • Received : 2021.10.30
  • Accepted : 2021.11.19
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Butterflies make an important part for plant-pollinator guild. These are nectar feeder or occasionally pollen feeder and thus proboscis of the butterfly species are considered as one of the most important variable in relation to the collection of food from plants. In butterfly-plant association, nectar source is principally determined by quality of nectar, corolla length, and nectar quantity. For the butterfly, nectar uptake is determined by proboscis length because flowers with long corolla restrict butterfly species containing shorter proboscis. Empirical studies proved that butterfly species with high wing loading visit clustered flowers and species with low wing loading confined their visit to solitary or less nectar rich flowers. The present study tries to investigate the flower preference of butterfly species from Lycaenidae family having very short proboscis, lower body length, lower body weight and wing span than the most species belonging from Nymphalidae, Pieridae, Papilionidae, and Hesperiidae. Results: Butterflies with shorter proboscis cannot access nectar from deeper flower. Although they mainly visit on less deeper flower to sucking nectar, butterflies with high wing loading visits clustered flowers to fulfill their energy requirements. In this study, we demonstrated flower choice of seven butterfly species belonging to Lycanidiae family. The proboscis length maintains a positive relationship with body length and body weight. Body length maintains a positive relationship with body weight and wing span. Wing span indicate a strong positive relationship with body weight. This study proved that these seven butterfly species namely Castalius rosimon (CRN), Taracus nara (TNA), Zizinia otis (ZOT), Zizula hylax (ZHY), Jamides celeno (JCE), Chilades laius (CLA), and Psuedozizeeria maha (PMA) visit frequently in Tridax procumbens (TPR), Ocimum americanum (OAM) and Syndrella nodiflora (SNO). The species do not visit Lantana camara (LCA) and Catharanthus roseus (CRO) plants. Conclusion: The present study proved that butterfly species visits frequently in Tridax procumbens (TPR), Ocimum americanum (OAM) but less frequently in Syndrella nodiflora (SNO). So, that study determined the butterfly species helps in pollination of these herbs that in turn helps the conservation of these butterfly species.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thankfully acknowledge Head, Department of Zoology, SKB University, Purulia, India, and Head, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Burdwan, India, for the facilities provided. The authors thankfully acknowledge the critical comments of the anonymous Reviewers and the suggestions of the respected Editor that helped in transforming the manuscript in the present form.

References

  1. Alexandersson R, Johnson S. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc R Soc B. 2002;269(1491):631-6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1928.
  2. Barth FG. Insects and flowers. In: The biology of a partnership. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1991.
  3. Biswas, S.J.B, Patra, D, Roy, S, Giri, S.K, Paul, S, Hossain, A. Butterfly diversity throughout Midnapore urban area in West Bengal, India J Threatened Taxa2019; 11(4): 14816-14826.https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4587.11.14.14816-14826
  4. Corbet SA. Butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2000;96:289-98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00708.x.
  5. Courtney SP. The ecology of pierid butterflies: dynamics and interactions. Adv Ecol Res. 1986;15:51-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60120-8.
  6. Dennis RLH. Butterflies and climate change. Manchester (UK): Manchester University Press; 1993.
  7. Dobson H. Floral volatiles in insect biology. In: Bernays E, editor. Insect-plant interactions, vol. 5. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1994. p. 47-81.
  8. Duster JV, Gruber MH, Karolyi F, Plant JD, Krenn HW. Drinking with a very long proboscis: Functional morphology of orchid bee mouthparts (Euglossini, Apidae, Hymenoptera). Arthropod Struct Dev. 2018;47:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2017.12.004.
  9. Goulson D, Ollerton J, Sluman C. Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: when to switch? Anim Behav. 1997;53(5):1009-16. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0390.
  10. Grant V, Grant KA. Hawkmoth pollination of Mirabilis longiflora (Nyctaginaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80(5):1298-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.5.1298.
  11. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4(1):9.
  12. Heinrich B. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology. 1976;57(5):874-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941054.
  13. Ilse D. Uber den farbensinn der tagfalter. Z Verl Physiol. 1928;8:658-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40182-8_1.
  14. Ilse D, Vaidya V. G.. Spontaneous feeding response to colours in Papiliodemoleus L. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. India Sect B. 1956;43(1):23-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050215.
  15. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disadraconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution. 1997;51:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02387.x.
  16. Krenn HW, Plant JD, Szucsich NU. Mouthparts of flower-visiting insects. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2005;34(1):1-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2004.10.002.
  17. Kunte K. Allometry and functional constraints on proboscis lengths in butterflies. Funct Ecol. 2007;21(5):982-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01299.x.
  18. Kunze J, Gumbert A. The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior. of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav Ecol. 2001;12(4):447-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.4.447.
  19. Lewis AC. Flower visit consistency in Pieris rapae, the cabbage butterfly. J Anim Ecol. 1989;58(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/4982.
  20. Lunau K, Maier, E.J. Innate colour preferences of flower visitors. J Comp Physiol A 1995 177:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243394, 1.
  21. May PG. Flower selection and the dynamics of lipid reserves in two nectarivorous butterflies. Ecology. 1992;73(6):2181-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941466.
  22. Mukherjee SS, Ahmed MT, Hossain A. Role of a Global Invasive Species (GIS), Lantana camara in conservation and sustenance of local butterfly community. Acta Ecol Sin. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.02.008.
  23. Mukherjee SS, Hossain A. Role of morphological variables of the visitor butterfly species in relation to their foraging behaviour on Lantana camara : Implication for conservation. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2020.11.003.
  24. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio. Boston, MA: PBC; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 16 Aug 2021.
  25. Scherer C, Kolb G. The influence of color stimuli on visually controlled behavior in Aglaisurticae L. and Parargeaegeria L. (Lepidoptera). J Comp Physiol A. 1987;61:891-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610230.
  26. Son HD, Im HT, Choi SW. Pollination of Cleisostomascolopendrifolium (Orchidaceae) by megachilid bees and determinants of fruit set in southern South Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2019;43:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0102-3.
  27. Swihart SL. The neural basis of colour vision in the butterfly Papiliotroilus. J Insect Physiol. 1970;16(8):1623-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(70)90262-3.
  28. Temeles EJ, Kress WJ. Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science. 2003;300(5619):630-3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080003.
  29. Tiple AD, Deshmukh VP, Dennis RLH. Factors influencing nectar plant resource visits by butterflies on a university campus: implications for conservation. Nota Lepidopterologica. 2006;28:213-24.
  30. Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH. Adult butterfly feeding-nectar flower associations: Constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology. J Nat Hist. 2009;43(13-14):855-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610568.
  31. Van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt A. A. Mate-locating strategies are related to relative body length and wing colour in the speckled wood butterfly Parargeaegeria. Ecol Entomol. 1997;22(1):116-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00041.x.
  32. Weiss MR, Papaj DR. Colour learning in two behavioural contexts: how much can a butterfly keep in mind? Anim Behav. 2003;65(3):425-34. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2084.