Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stakeholder Perception on the Transplanting Damaged Trees

훼손 수목 이식에 대한 이해관계자 인식 연구

  • Moon, Yoonjung (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Park, Hongjun (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Cha, Jaegyu (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Na, Jinjoo (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Seonmi (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 문윤정 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 박홍준 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 차재규 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 나진주 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 이선미 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실)
  • Received : 2021.10.26
  • Accepted : 2021.12.09
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

About 10% of trees damaged by the development projects are to be transplanted when conducting the Environmental Impact Assessment. However, various problems have been raised during transplantation. In this study, we confirm the stakeholder's perceptions of the problems that occur during transplantation. The survey was conducted from October 9 to 25, 2020. Among the stakeholder groups, 36 respondents participated in the consulting institute group, 44 from the review institute group, and 83 from the developer·agency group (total of 163). All three groups responded that it was necessary to transplant some of the damaged trees even if the development charge increased because the damage caused by the development project was serious. The most serious problem was 'high mortality'. The response rate was high that all three groups should plant the same species with the same quantity as an alternative method in case of withering. In order to reduce the mortality rate, small-sized trees were transplanted and transplanted trees were expanded to include planted species and landscape trees. In addition, the number of transplanted trees was high in response to calculating the transplantratio to the number of native tree damaged. The percentage of respondents who said that it was necessary to allocate a separate manager was also high. The results will be used as basic data to improve problems that occur during transplantation of damaged trees.

환경영향평가 시 개발사업으로 훼손되는 수목의 약 10%를 이식 또는 재활용하도록 하고 있으나, 이식 시 여러 가지 문제점들이 제기되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이해관계자를 대상으로 이식 시 발생하는 문제점에 대한 인식을 파악하였다. 2020년 10월 9일부터 25일까지 실시한 설문조사에 협의기관, 검토기관, 사업자·대행자 그룹별 각각 36명, 44명, 83명(총 163명)이 참여하였다. 세 그룹 모두 개발사업으로 인한 훼손이 심각하므로 개발 부담금이 증가하더라도 훼손 수목의 일부를 이식하는 것이 필요하다고 응답하였다. 가장 심각하다고 응답한 문제점은 고사율이었다. 고사 시 대체 방안으로 세 그룹 모두 동일한 수종과 수량을 식재해야 한다는 응답 비율이 높았다. 고사율을 줄이기 위해 이식 수목은 크기가 작은 것을 이식하고, 이식 수종은 식재종과 조경 수종을 포함하여 확대시키고, 이식 수목량은 자생 수목량 대비 이식 비율을 산정하자는 응답 비율이 높았다. 관리자를 별도로 배치할 필요가 있다고 응답한 비율도 높았다. 본 설문조사의 결과는 훼손 수목의 이식 시 발생하는 문제점을 개선하기 위한 기초 자료로 활용할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국립생태원의 「환경영향평가 가이식장운영 개선 연구(NIE-기반연구-2021-30)」와 한국환경기술원의 「ICT기반 환경영향평가 의사결정 지원기술개발사업(No.2020002990009)」의 지원을 받아 수행하였으며, 2021년도 한국환경영향평가학회 춘계학술대회의 포스터 발표 자료를 일부 수정하여 발전시켰습니다.

References

  1. Ban YU, Joo KS, Jeong HK, Hwang GH. 2010. Improvement of EIS Documentation & Consultation Precess through Expert Survey Method 19(2): 141-151. [Korean Literature]
  2. Cho HR. 2010. Cost effectiveness depending on the Native Tree Treatment Methods. MS degree, Graduate School of Chungnam National University, p. 82. [Korean Literature]
  3. Cho HR, Kim SB, Oh DK. 2009. Cost effectiveness depending on the native tree treatment methods. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 12(6): 51-62. [Korean Literature]
  4. Cho NW. 2020. An Empirical Study on the Institutional Change of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focused on Agreed Terms. Ph.D. Dissertation, graduate school of Yonsei University, p. 172. [Korean Literature]
  5. Commission of the European Communities. 1985. Council directive of 27 Jun 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities L175: 40-48.
  6. Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. 2004. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64(3): 391-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386
  7. Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2005. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Principles and procedures, process, practice and prospects (3rd edition). UCL Press, London, p. 448.
  8. Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27: 287-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001.
  9. Jung SG. 2012. An Analysis on the use situation of the reusing Landscape tree in lanscaping of re-construction Apartment Complex. Ma degree, the Graduate School of Engineering, Hanyang University, p. 143. [Korean Literature]
  10. Kim JH. 2019. Stakeholder perceptions of cultural heritage utilization. Internation Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 33(1): 51-66. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.21298/ijthr.2019.1.33.1.51
  11. Kim SM, Lee IS. 2007. The Issues of Topsoil Preservation in Land Development Projects. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(2): 91-96. [Korean Literature]
  12. Korea Environment Institute. 2015. 「EIA Guideline Series A(Ver1.0)」. p. 7. [Korean Literature]
  13. Korea Environment Institute. 2017. 「EIA Guideline Series A(Ver2.0)」. p. 21. [Korean Literature]
  14. Korea Forest Service. 2020. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. [Korean Literature]
  15. Korea Land Development Corporation. 1994. The Study of Utilizing Wild Plants in Land Development District-Focused on New Town (Bundang and Ilsan)-. Korea Land Development Corporation Report, p. 113. [Korean Literature]
  16. Korea Land & Housing Corporation. 2020. LH Construction Specification. [Korean Literature]
  17. Lee HS, Im JH. 2019. SPSS new UI manual. Jyphyunjae, Seoul. p. 200. [Korean Literature]
  18. Lee JH. 2020. Environmental Impact Assessment Consultation Based on Land Environment and Natural & Ecological Environment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 29(1): 45-46. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2020.29.1.45
  19. Lee SC, Jo BY, Choi SH. 2015. A Study of Establishment Ratio of Native Tree Transplant. J. KILA. 43(2): 23-29. [Korean Literature]
  20. Lee SD, Choi SH. 2009. Study on the Selection Criteria for Transplanting Trees in the Forest Reserve Areas Designated for Future Development. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(6): 535-544. [Korean Literature]
  21. Lee SD, Kang HK. 2012. Transplantation Method of Damage Ecosystem Associated with Development of the Borrow Pits. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 26(3): 394-405. [Korean Literature]
  22. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2019. Standard specification for landscaping construction. Notice of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 2019-387 (2019.7.26.). [Korean Literature]
  23. National Institute of Ecology. 2020. Operational improvement of temporary transplant site in Environmental Impact Assessment, p. 76. [Korean Literature]
  24. Pak SI, Oh TH. 2010. The application of Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Journal of Veterianary Clinics 27(1): 71-78. [Korean Literature]
  25. Park CM. 2002. The Restoration Technique of Native Forest Resources on the Development Land applied in the New Campus of Kyushu University, Japan. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 5(3): 50-57. [Korean Literature]
  26. Wood C. 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (2nd edition). Routledge, New York, p. 430.
  27. EIASS (Environmental Impact Assessment Information Suport System). Consultation status statistics. https://www.eiass.go.kr/statistic/statusStatsNew.do (2021.1.23. accessed). [Korean Literature]
  28. National Law Information Center. The Environmental Impact Assessment Act. https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%98%EA%B2%BD%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80%EB%B2%95#undefined (2021.1.23. accessed). [Korean Literature]