디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

텍스트 마이닝을 활용한 저출산 정책과 대중인식 비교

Comparative Analysis of Low Fertility Policy and the Public Perceptions using Text-Mining Methodology

  • 배기련 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 러닝헬스시스템융합전공) ;
  • 문현정 (한국외국어대학교 행정학과) ;
  • 이재일 (경희대학교 일반대학원 문화관광콘텐츠학과) ;
  • 박미나 (한세대학교 일반대학원 ICT 환경공학과) ;
  • 박아름 (용인예술과학대학교 빅데이터 경영학과)
  • Bae, Giryeon (Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Dept. of Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Moon, HyunJeong (Dept. of Public Administration Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Lee, Jaeil (Dept. of Culture, Tourism & Content, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Mina (Dept. of ICT Environmental Engineeing, Hansei University) ;
  • Park, Arum (Dept. of Big Data & Business Management, Yong-In Arts&Science University)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.15
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한국의 저출산 심화에 따라 본 연구는 정부의 저출산 대응정책과 그에 대한 대중인식을 비교하여 근본적인 차이점을 밝히고자 했다. 이를 위해 네 차례의 '저출산·고령사회 기본계획'과 제3·4차 기본계획 발표 직후 2주간의 뉴스 댓글을 분석대상으로 선정하여, 빈도분석, 동시출현단어 분석, 구조적 등위성 분석을 실시하였다. 정책문서 빈도분석결과 제1·2차 시기는 직접적인 보육지원이, 제3·4차 시기부터는 사회구조적인 접근이 눈에 띄었다. 동시출현단어 분석에서는 정책과 댓글 모두 '육아'에서 일과 가정의 양립을 지향하였다. '결혼'과 '출산'의 경우 댓글은 연속성, 정책은 단절성이 두드러지며 특히 주거와 고용문제에서 큰 차이가 있었다. 댓글의 구조적 등위성 분석 결과에서는 대중들의 자녀 양육환경에 대한 관심, 정책 실효성에 대한 문제의식을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 빅데이터를 활용해 대중들의 인식을 확인하였다는 점에서 의의를 가지므로, 이에 근거한 정책 개선 등 향후 저출산 대응이 나아가야 할 방향을 수립하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

As the low fertility intensifies in Korea, this study investigated fundamental differences between the government's low fertility policy and public perception of it. To this end, we selected four times 'Aging Society and Population Policy' documents and news comments for two weeks immediately after announcement of the third and fourth Policy as analysis targets. Then we conducted word frequency analysis, co-occurrence analysis and CONCOR analysis. As a result of analyses, first, direct childcare support during the first and second periods, and a social structural approach during third and fourth periods were noticeable. Second, it was revealed that both policies and comments aim for the work-family compatibility in 'parenting'. Lastly it was showed public interest in environment of raising children and the critical mind to effectiveness of the policy. This study is meaningful in that it confirmed the public perception using big data analysis, and it will help improve the direction for the future low fertility policy.

키워드

과제정보

This work is the result of the 2021 Data Youth Campus Project hosted by the Ministry of Science and ICT and supervised by the Korea Data Industry Promotion Agency. Also, this work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2020S1A5B8103855).

참고문헌

  1. S.W. Park. (2021.02.24.). Even After Spending Ten of Trillions of Won Every Year, the Fertility Rate is the Lowest Among OECD Countries... Is the Population Declining Faster?. News of Chosun Biz. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2021/02/24/2021022400946.html
  2. S.H. Chung. (2015). Policy Responses to Low Fertility and Its Problem. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 38(2), 113-134. UCI: G704-000152.2015.38.2.004
  3. H.S. Cho & H.J. Jo. (2021). A Study of on the Low Fertility Research Trends in Korea: Focusing on 2011-2020. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 25(3), 253-277. DOI: 10.32349/ECERR.2021.6.25.3.253
  4. S.H. Chung. (2012). A Study of the Effectiveness of Policies in Responses to Low Fertility. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 35(1), 31-52. UCI: G704-000152.2012.35.1.009
  5. H.J. Lee, H.K. Shin & J.O. Cheong. (2021). The Effect of Policy Change for Raising Women's Fertility Intention in South Korea. Korea Society and Public Administration, 31(4), 225-251. https://doi.org/10.53865/KSPA.2021.02.31.4.225
  6. S.H. Chung. (2018). A Critical Review on Paradigm Shift in Policy Responses to Low Fertility. Journal of Public Society, 8(2), 36-64. DOI: 10.21286/jps.2018.05.8.2.36
  7. S.S. Lee (2018. June). The Fertility Rate Recovery, the Approach should be Changed. Monthly Public Policy, Vol.152, 50-53.
  8. Y.C. Yang. (2019). A Study on the History of Korean Population Policy: Focusing on the Failure of Natalist Policies. Journal of Association for Korean Public Administration History, No.47, 129-164. DOI: 10.15856/jakpah.2019.47.47.129
  9. S.H. Jeong. (2019. June). Low Fertiliy, Clear Divison Roles between the State and Localities. Seminar Materials for the Korean Society of Local Finance, 1-7.
  10. H.B. Woo. (2018). Population Policies in the Era of Low Fertility - Current State and Futrue Directions in South Korea. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 41(2), 37-59. DOI: 10.31693/KJPS.2018.06.41.2.31
  11. M.J. Kim. (2020). Analyzing the Trend of Wearable Keywords using Text-mining Methodology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(9), 181-190. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.9.181
  12. D.S. Park & H.J. Kim. (2018). A Proposal of Join Vector for Semantic Factor Reflection in TF-IDF Based Keyword Extraction. Journal of KIIT, 16(2), 1-16. DOI: 10.14801/jkiit.2018.16.2.1
  13. K.J. Yang & C.B. Woo. (2021). ROK Military's Roles and Disaster Relief Activities in the Time of COVID-19 - The Transformation into Comprehensive Security to Achieve Positive Peace through Cooperative Networks. Crisisonomy, 17(5), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2021.17.5.21
  14. Korea Press Foundation. (2020). Media Users in Korea 2020. Seoul : KPF
  15. H.K. Kim & H.J. Choi. (2021). A Qualitative Study on Women's Subjective Perception of Low Birth Rate Policy. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, 35(1), 119-140 DOI: 10.18398/kjlgas.2021.35.1.119
  16. B.H. Kim. (2017.12.26.). The Real Problem with Women's Maternity Strike is Not Low Birth Rates, but the Quality of Life of the People. News of Hankyoreh. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/politics/bluehouse/82518 2.html
  17. H.J. Kim. (2018). Perception Pattern Analysis of Current Policy Response to Low Fertility in Korean : Q-Methodological Approach. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 20(1), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.22944/KSWA.2018.20.1.008
  18. J. W. Lee et al. (2018). 2018 National Childcare Survey. Sejong : Ministry of Health and Welfare.
  19. J.H. Jeong (2020.11.20.). The Uncomfortable Truth of Low Fertility Policy. Aging Soceity and Population Policy http://www.betterfuture.go.kr/front/notificationSpace /columnDetail.do?articleId=126
  20. KOSTAT. (2020). Population Trend Survey. Daegu : KOSTAT
  21. Ministry of Employment and Labor. (2020). Survey on Living and Working Compatible. Sejong : MOEL
  22. E.Y. Choi. (2006. April). Low Fertility Policy in Advanced Countries. Korea Development Institute. https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/publish/naraView.do?cidx=5224