디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

블렌디드 러닝 환경에서 교사의 지지가 중국 대학생의 영어 듣기 능력에 미치는 영향

Effects of Teacher Support on Chinese EFL University Students' Listening Ability in a Blended Learning Environment

  • 양정 (세한대학교 대학원 교육학과) ;
  • 김나영 (세한대학교 교양학부)
  • Yang, Ting (Dept. of Education, Graduate School, Sehan University) ;
  • Kim, Na-Young (Dept. of General Education, Sehan University)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.28
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 블렌디드 러닝 환경에서 교사의 지지가 중국 대학생들의 영어 듣기 능력에 미치는 영향을 탐색하는 데 있다. 본 연구는 중국의 한 대학에서 영어를 전공하고 있는 3학년 학생 총 87명을 대상으로 진행하였으며, 실험을 위해 참가자들을 자율성 지지 그룹, 정서적 지지 그룹, 인지적 지지 그룹, 통제 그룹으로 나누었다. 모든 참가자들은 일주일에 두 시간씩 총 17주 동안 영어 듣기 수업에 참가하였고. 실험 집단에 따라 각기 다른 교사의 지지를 받았다. 교사의 지지 효과를 검증하고자 실험 전과 후 사전 사후 듣기 시험을 실시하였고, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 모든 그룹의 영어 듣기 능력이 통계적으로 유의미하게 향상된 것으로 나타나 블렌디드 러닝 환경에서 교사의 지지가 중국 대학생들의 영어 듣기 실력을 향상시키는 데 효과적임을 보여 주었다. 그룹 간 차이를 비교해본 결과, 정서적 지지보다 자율성 지지와 인지적 지지가 학생의 듣기 실력을 향상시키는 데 더 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 영어를 외국어로 학습하는 EFL환경에서 교사가 수업 계획과 활동을 구성하는데 유용한 시사점을 제공하고자 한다.

This study aims to explore the differential effects of teacher support on Chinese EFL students' listening ability in a blended learning environment. 87 third-year English-major students in a Chinese university participated in this study and they were randomly divided into an autonomy group (n=22), an emotional group (n=22), a cognitive group (n=22) and a control group (n=21). Each experimental group received relevant teacher support during their 17-week course learning while the control group did not. To confirm the effects of teacher support, pre- and post- listening tests were conducted. The results of the paired t-tests demonstrated that all groups showed statistically significant improvement in their English listening ability. The results of the one-way ANOVA for the post-test revealed that autonomy support and cognitive support were more effective than emotional support in improving students' listening ability. Based on the findings, this study hopes to provide insights for EFL teachers in designing and arranging the activities in a blended course.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yu, X. (2016). The status quo of English teaching in China: An EFL perspective. Foreign Language Teaching Theory and Practice, (3). 37-42.
  2. Firdmuc J. (2016). Foreign languages and trade: Evidence from a natural experiment. Empirical Economics,50(1): 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0999-7
  3. Nordquist, R. (2020, March 26). English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Thoughtco. Retrived from https://www.thoughtco.com/english-as-a-foreign-language-efl-1690597.
  4. Longcope, P. (2009). Differences between the EFL and the ESL language learning contexts. Studies in Language and Culture, 30(2), 303-320.
  5. Khajavy, G., MacIntyre, P., & Barabadi, E. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 605-624. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263117000304
  6. Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: Learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 297-323. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881
  7. Gan, Z. (2020). How learning motivation influences feedback experience and preference in Chinese university EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 496. 1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00496
  8. Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2011). Perceived teacher support and language anxiety in Polish secondary school EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 83-100. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.5
  9. Luan, L., Hong, J.-C., Cao, M., Dong, Y., & Hou, X. (2020). Exploring the role of online EFL learners' perceived social support in their learning engagement: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1855211
  10. Asakereh, A., & Yousofi, N. (2018). Reflective thinking, self-efficacy, self-esteem and academic achievement of Iranian EFL students in higher education: Is there a relationship?. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(1), 68-89. DOI: 10.17583/ijep.2018.2896
  11. Deci, E. L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L., & Tomassone, J. (1992). Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(7), 457-471. DOI: 10.1177/002221949202500706
  12. Zohre Kazemi, Ali Zare-Moghaddam, Hasan Emami. (2017). The role of perceived teacher's support and motivational orientation in prediction of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in learning English. RELP. 5(1):17-26.
  13. Zou Shen, Fang Xiucai, Chen Wei. (2012). Analysis on TEM-4 and TEM-8 in 2011, Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, (01), 1-10.
  14. Deng, Q. L. (2015). A study of the correlation between Chinese non-English major EFL students' metacognition, listening anxiety and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Teaching, 36 (5). 59-64. DOI: 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2015.05.013
  15. Kim, N. Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2021). A comparative study on blended bearning and flipped learning: EFL students' learner autonomy, independence, and attitudes. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 171-188. DOI: 10.15738/kjell.21..202103.171
  16. Jiang, Z. H., Zhao, C. L., Li, H. X., Huang, Y., & Shu, F. F. (2018). The power of self-regulated learning ability: Effect on learner-percevied teacher support and satisfaction. Open Education Research, 24 (4), 81-89. DOI: 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2018.04.009
  17. Chai, X.Y., & Gong S.Y. (2013). The development of questionnaire on perceived mathematics teacher support for middle school students. Studies of Psychology and Behavior. 11(04),511-517. DOI: CNKI:SUN:CLXW.0.2013-04-015
  18. Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2014). Students' perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21-36. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v7n1p21
  19. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 262-273. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
  20. Liu, B., Zhang, W. L., & Liu, J. L. (2017). Study on the effect of teacher support on online Learners' learning engagement. E-Education Research. (11),63-68+80. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2017.11.010.
  21. Zhao, Ch. L., Li, H. X., Jiang, Z. H., & Huang, Y. (2018). Alleviating online learners' burnout: A study on the influence of teachers' emotional support. Distance Education and Online Learning. (02), 29-36.
  22. Ghazizadeh, T., & Fatemipour, H. (2017). The effect of blended learning on EFL learners' reading proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 606-614. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.0803.21.
  23. Ginaya, G., Rejeki, I. N. M., & Astuti, N. N. S. (2018). The effects of blended learning to students' speaking ability. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(3), 1-14. DOI: 10.21744/ijllc.v4i3.661
  24. Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learner's engagement, achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3890-3894. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.167
  25. Mitchell, S., & DellaMattera, J. (2011). Teacher support and student's self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 5(2). 24-35. DOI: 10.20355/c5x30q
  26. Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health: Lectures on concept development. Behavioral Publications.
  27. Kerres Malecki, C., & Kilpatrick Demary, M. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1002/pits.10004
  28. Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents' motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMLE Online, 38(8), 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
  29. VN Hoi, & GM Mu. (2020). Perceived teacher support and students acceptance of mobile-assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology. 1-20. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13044
  30. Tas, Y., Subasi, M., & Yerdelen, S. (2018). The role of motivation between perceived teacher support and student engagement in science class. Educational Studies, 45(5), 582-592. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2018.1509778
  31. Lam, S. F., Cheng, R. W. Y., & Ma, W. Y. (2009). Teacher and student intrinsic motivation in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 37(6), 565-578. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-008-9070-9
  32. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896-915. DOI: 10.1037/a0019545
  33. Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97-110. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
  34. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993) . Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology. 85 (4), 571-581. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  35. Titsworth, S., Quinlan, M. M., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Emotion in teaching and learning: Development and validation of the classroom emotions scale. Communication Education, 59(4), 431-452. DOI: 10.1080/03634521003746156
  36. Lam, S. F., & Law, Y. K. (2007). The roles of instructional practices and motivation in writing performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(2), 145-164. DOI: 10.3200/jexe.75.2.145-164
  37. Richland, L. E., Begolli, K. N., Simms, N., Frausel, R. R., & Lyons, E. A. (2016). Supporting mathematical discussions: The roles of comparison and cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 41-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-016-9382-2
  38. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
  39. Hoic-Bozic, N., Holenko Dlab, M., & Mornar, V. (2016). Recommender system and Web 2.0 tools to enhance a blended learning model. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(1), 39-44. DOI: 10.1109/te.2015.2427116
  40. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Khosrow-Pour, D. B. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, First Edition, (pp.253-259). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch047
  41. Graham, C. R. (2012). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, (pp. 46-66). John Wiley & Sons
  42. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
  43. Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1002.03
  44. Grgurovic, M. (2011). Blended learning in an ESL class: A case study. Calico Journal, 29(1), 100-117. DOI: 10.11139/cj.29.1.100-117
  45. Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(3), 223-232.
  46. Yoon, S. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2010). The perspectives and effectiveness of blended learning in L2 writing of Korean university students. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 177-204. DOI: 10.15702/mall.2010.13.2.177
  47. Cui, G. Y. (2014). An experimental research on blended learning in the development of listening and speaking skills in China. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 32(4), 447-460. DOI: 10.2989/16073614.2014.999989
  48. Huang, Q. (2016). Learners' perceptions of blended learning and the roles and interaction of f2f and online learning. Ortesol Journal, 33, 14-33.
  49. Zou, B. (2013). Teachers' support in using computers for developing students' listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 83-99. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2011.631143
  50. Ahmad, S. Z. (2016). The flipped classroom model to develop Egyptian EFL students' listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 166-178. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v9n9p166
  51. Chen, J. J-L. (2005) Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to HongKong adolescents' academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77-127, DOI: 10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127
  52. National Education Examination Authority. (n.d.). About CET. Retrieved from http://cet.neea.edu.cn/html1/folder/16033/247-1.htm
  53. Jia, W. W. & Yue, C. J. (2019). Will English proficiency lead to higher starting salary? The empirical research of 2017 college graduates survey. Education Research Monthly. 5,78-86. DOI: 10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2019.05.010.
  54. Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning -- parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(02), 163-178. DOI: 10.1017/s0958344005000224
  55. Kazemi, Z., Zarehmoghadam, A., & Emami, H. (2017). The Role of perceived teacher's support and motivational orientation in prediction of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in learning English. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1):17-26.
  56. Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002
  57. Kim, N.-Y. (2016). Effects of voice chat on EFL learners' speaking ability according to proficiency levels. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 19(4), 63-88. DOI: 10. 15702/mall.2016.19.4.63 https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2016.19.4.63
  58. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. DOI: 10.1002/1098-237x(200011)84:6<740::aid-sce4>3.0.co;2-3
  59. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (416-436). Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249215.n21
  60. Rajuan, M., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2008). Student teachers' perceptions of their mentors as internal triggers for learning. Teaching Education, 19(4), 279-292. DOI: 10.1080/10476210802339951
  61. Taras, M. 2010. "Student Self-Assessment: Processes and Consequences." Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 199-209. DOI: 10.1080/13562511003620027.
  62. Xiang, X., Yuan, R., & Yu, B. (2021). Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1965539
  63. Wu, H. J., Ge, W. S., & He, J. H. (2020). Effect of teachr support on the learning persistence of MOOC: Based on S-O-R and TAM perspective. Modern Distance Education, (03),89-96. DOI: 10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20200629.002.
  64. Elliott, B. (1995). Developing relationships: Significant episodes in professional development. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and practice, 1(2), 247-264. DOI: 10.1080/1354060950010207
  65. Kim, N. Y. (2018). A study on chatbots for developing Korean college students' English listening and reading skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), 19-26. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.8.019