디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권12호
  • /
  • Pages.243-253
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP를 활용한 스마트시티 사업의 전략적 우선순위 분석: 잠재적 주민을 대상으로

Examining the Strategic Priorities for Smart City Project with Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on a Survey of Potential Residents

  • 투고 : 2021.10.14
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 스마트시티에 거주할 의향이나 가능성이 있는 잠재적인 주민들을 대상으로 AHP 분석기법을 활용해 전략목표에 대한 우선순위를 파악하는 데 목적이 있다. 스마트시티 사업의 비전, 핵심가치, 전략목표에 대한 계층구조도를 설정하기 위해 국내외 스마트시티 관련 학술논문 및 연구보고서, 사업계획서, 기관 홈페이지 등을 조사하여 교수, 연구원, 전문가 및 포커스 그룹의 검토를 거쳐 최종적으로 2계층 4개, 3계층 12개 속성들을 선정, 계층구조도를 확정하였다. 이를 바탕으로 AHP 분석을 실시한 결과, 주민들은 스마트시티 사업에 있어 삶의 질을 가장 중요시 여기는 것으로 나타났다. 하위 계층 요인에 대한 분석 결과로는 안전성을 가장 중요시 하는 것으로 나타났으며, 생활편의성, 친환경, 사회적 불평등 해소 순으로 우선순위가 분석되었다. 이러한 분석 결과를 통해 향후 스마트시티 사업 추진 시 세워야 할 전략을 제시할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

In this study, AHP analysis was conducted on potential residents who are willing or likely to live in a smart city. The purpose is to identify priorities for strategic objectives. In order to establish a hierarchical structure for the vision, core values, and strategic goals of the smart city business, we researched domestic and overseas smart city-related academic papers and research reports, business plans, and institutional websites. After reviewing professors, researchers, experts, and focus groups, 4 2nd tier and 12 3rd tier properties were finally selected and the hierarchical structure was confirmed. As a result of AHP analysis, it was found that residents place the highest importance on quality of life in smart city projects. As a result of the analysis of the lower-level factors, it was found that safety was the most important. The priorities were analyzed in the order of living convenience, eco-friendliness, and social inequality resolution. It is expected that the results of this analysis will be able to suggest strategies to be established when promoting smart city projects in the future.

키워드

과제정보

This work is supported by the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement(KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(Grant 21DEAP-B158906-02).

참고문헌

  1. Act on Smart City Creation and Industry Promotion (2009). https://www.law.go.kr
  2. Amsterdam Smart City (2009). https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/network/amsterdam-smart-city
  3. B. J. Kim. & H. S. Ha. (2019). Exploring the Determinants of Citizens' Perceptions of Smart City: Focusing on Comparison of New and Established Cities in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 32(3), 63-79. DOI: 10.36700/JDC.2019.09.32.3.63
  4. Busan Eco Delta Smart Village (2018). https://busan-smartvillage.com/
  5. C. G. Kim. (2008). A Priority Analysis on Corporate Resource Allocation through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of the Korea Community Development Society 8(1), 109-125.
  6. C., Manville, G., Cochrane, J., Cave, J., Millard, J. K., Pederson, R. K., Thaarup, ... & B., Kotterink. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU.
  7. Daegu Smart Support Center (2019). https://smartdaegu.kr/
  8. European Commission (2015, Sep. 15). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/smart-cities
  9. F. Zahedi. (1986) The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of the Method and Its Applications. Interfaces 16, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96
  10. H. I. Ahn. (2007). Comparative study on weight and eigenvalue calculation method in hierarchical analytical decision-making process. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 953-960
  11. H. J. Chang. & D. N. Kim. (2016). A Study on big data utilization for implementation of the resident participation type safe community planning of the smart city. Journal of Korea Institute of Information, Electronics, and Communication Technology 9(5), 478-495. DOI:10.17661/JDC.2016.9.5.478
  12. H. J. Chang. (2020). A Study on the Procedure of Using Big Data to Solve Smart City Problems Based on Citizens' Needs and Participation. Journal of Korea Institute of Information, Electronics, and Communication Technology 13(2), 102-112 https://doi.org/10.17661/JKIIECT.2020.13.2.102
  13. H. J. Kim., S. E. Yoo., K. W. Lee., J. W. Lim. & S. G. Hong. (2021). Analysis of requirements for smart city transportation based on smart governance. The Korea Society of Management information Systems, 315-318
  14. H. Y. Jang, & N. G. Kim. (2017). A Study on Smart City Governance and Collaboration Direction of Government Departments : Focus on MOLIT and MSIP. Journal of the Korea Contest Association, 17(5), 430-439.
  15. H. Y. Jang. (2017). A Study on Priority Analysis for Activating the Convergence Smart City Service. Journal of the Korea Contents Association 17(8), 152-161 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.08.152
  16. H. Y. Jang. (2018). A Study on Framework Development Directions for Solving Smart City Issues. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 19(5), 432-443. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.5.432
  17. H. Y. Jang. (2018). Smart City Policy Trends and Future Agendas in Korea. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 19(6), 507-518 https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.6.507
  18. IBM Developer. (2020, Apr. 28). https://developer.ibm.com
  19. Info Barcelona. (2017). https://www.barcelona.cat/infobarcelona/en/tema/smart-city
  20. International Organization for Standardization(ISO). (2020). ISO and sustainable cities.
  21. International Telecommunication Union(ITU). (2014). Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions.
  22. ITU-T (2016). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/ssc/Pages/info-ssc.aspx
  23. J. C. Lee., M. S. Jeon. & H. C. Jeong. (2014). A Statistical Testing of the Consistency Index in Analytic Hierarchy Process. The Korean journal of applied statistics 27(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2014.27.1.103
  24. J. T. Park, S. M. Cheon. & S. J. Go. (2014). IoT-based healthcare service and platform trends. Information and Communications Magazine 31(12), 25-30.
  25. J. Y. Lee, & S. H. Han. (2019). An Investigation of a Smart City Policy Change and Local Government Response. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 1-11.
  26. K. W. Nam, J. W. Park, J. H. Park, & S. T. Ji. (2017). The Organizational Structure and Role of Smart City Governance. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 33(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.22669/KRSA.2017.33.1.069
  27. K. W. Song. & Y. Lee. (2013). Re-scaling for Improving the Consistency of the AHP Method. Social Science Research Review 29(2), 271-288.
  28. L. G., Vargas. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  29. M. J. Choi., S. H. Lee., S. S. Jo., Y. J. Jung. & S. W. Jo. (2020). The Living Lab Model of Smart City Based on Citizen Participation. Journal of the Korea Contents Association 20(4), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.04.284
  30. M. S. Lee. (2017). Main Status and Cases of Smart City Demonstration Service Based on Internet of Things (IoT). The Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences, 34(9), 3-8.
  31. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. (2020). Urban Planning Status Statistics 2020
  32. R. F. Dyer, E. H. Forman, & M. A. Mustafa. (1992). Decision Support for Media Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Advertising 21(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1992.10673360
  33. S. Dirks, & M. Keeling (2010). A Vision of Smarter Cities: How cities can lead the way into. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Aras 1-7, Blok C4 & C5, Kompleks C, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, 62662 Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan. T+:(603) 8885 8000.
  34. S. H. Lee, & Y. T. Leem. (2016). Analyzing Characteristics of the Smart City Governance. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 19(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2016.19.2.086
  35. S. Y. An, S. Y. Kim, & H. Ju. (2019). Design and Application of User-Centered Design Concept in Smart City. The Journal of the Korea Contenets Association, 19(12), 440-451.
  36. Siheung City Hall (2019). https://www.siheung.go.kr/portal/smartcity/contents.do?mId=0100000000
  37. SMART CITIES NEW YORK (2012). https://smartcitiesny.com/
  38. Smart City Sejong National Pilot City (2019). https://ubin.krihs.re.kr/ubin/main.do
  39. T. Cook, P. Falchi, & R. S. Mariano. (1984). An Urban Allocation Model Combining Time Series and Analytic Hierarchical Methods. Management Science, 30, 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.2.198
  40. T. L. Saaty. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation. RWS publications, USA.
  41. T. L. Saaty. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP. In The analytic hierarchy process. 59-67.
  42. T. L. Saaty. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  43. T. L. Saaty, & L. G. Vargas. (2001) Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
  44. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision. Key Findings and Advance Tables.
  45. Vienna Smart City (2019). https://smartcity.wien.gv.at/en/home/
  46. Y. C. Ju., E. U. Lee. & W. J. Suh. (2020). An Analysis on the Smart City Research Trends. Journal of Korean Associastion for Regional Information Society, 23(2), 147-170.
  47. Y. K. Chung, & S. S. Lee. (2013). A Study on Development Strategy of Korean Hidden Champion Firm Utilizing the SWOT/AHP Technique. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.8.3.201309.97
  48. Y. K. Park, & S. M. Rye. (2015). Analysis on Smart City Service Technology with IoT. Korea Institute of Information Technology Magazine, 13(2), 31-37.
  49. Y. Wind, & T. L. Saaty. (1980) Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26, 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641