DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Conceptual Elements and Meaning of Meta-affect in Mathematics Learning

수학 학습 메타 정의의 개념 요소와 의미 탐색

  • Received : 2021.08.31
  • Accepted : 2021.09.28
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

In this study, in accordance with the research trend that the learner's emotions expressed positively or negatively in mathematics learning or the learner's beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics learning affect the results of mathematics learning, the learner's emotions and affective factors are analyzed in the learner's own learning. A power that can be adjusted according to a goal or purpose is needed, and I tried to explain this power through meta-affect. To this end, the meaning of the definitional and conceptual factors of meta-affect was explored based on prior studies. Affective factors of meta-affect were viewed as emotions, attitudes, and beliefs, and conceptual factors of meta-affect were viewed as awareness, evaluating, controlling, utilization, and monitoring, and the meaning of each conceptual factor was also defined. In this study, the conceptual factors and meanings of meta-affect in terms of using them to help in learning mathematics by controlling them, beyond the identification or examination of the characteristics of the affective factors, which are meaningfully dealt with in the field of mathematics education.

본 연구는 수학 학습에서 긍정적이거나 부정적으로 발현되는 학습자의 감정이나 학습자가 보유한 수학에 대한 신념, 태도가 수학 학습 결과에 영향을 미친다는 연구에 기반하여 학습자 감정이나 정의적 요소들을 학습자 자신의 학습 목표나 목적에 맞게 조절할 수 있는 요소를 강구하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 메타 정의에 관련된 연구들을 연결망 분석을 통하여 종합적으로 분석함으로써 메타 정의의 정의적 요소를 추출하고 이에 대한 개념을 분류, 그 의미를 탐색하였다. 그 결과 메타 정의의 정의적 요소로서 감정, 태도, 신념, 메타 정의의 개념 요소는 알아차리기(자각), 평가, 조절, 활용, 모니터링으로 도출할 수 있으며, 각 개념 요소에 대한 의미를 정의하였다. 본 연구 결과는 수학교육 분야에서 의미 있게 다뤄지는 정의적 영역과 관련하여 정의적 요소의 규명이나 특성에 대한 고찰을 넘어, 수학 학습에서 감정적 영역을 조절하고 이를 활용하기 위한 방안으로의 메타 정의의 개념 요소와 의미를 탐색하였다는데 그 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2020S1A5A2A01042564)

References

  1. Ko, H. K., Kim, H. W., Kaji S. &, Choi, S. (2017). Elementary school students who give up on learning mathematics: Correlations with non-cognitive learner characteristics. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(2). 19-36. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.1.19
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum.
  3. Kim, K, Y., Lee, B., J. (2019). A Case Study on the Affective Change of Underachieving Students in Mathematics During Reciprocal Peer Tutoring. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 22(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2019.22.3.003
  4. Kim, D, I., An, Y, J., Kwag, D, E., Park, S, M. (2018). The Effect of Learning Strategy on Affective Domain and Academic Achievement. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(3), 57-80.
  5. Kim, B, M., Kim, S, J. (2010). Instrument Development for Mathematical Achievement Attribution. The Mathematical Education, 49(4), 501-522.
  6. Kim, S, H. (2019). Delphi Study on the Concept and the Teaching and Learning Methods of Meta-affect in Mathematics. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 29(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.5.29.2.321
  7. Kim, S, H., Kim, J, Y. (2020). Structural Relationship between Affect, Meta-affect, and Meta-cognition in Mathematics Learning. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 30(3), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.427
  8. Kim, S, H., Park, J, U. (2011). Explorating Meta-Affect Types in Mathematical Learning. School Mathematics, 13(3), 469-484.
  9. Kim, S, S. (2019). Interpretations of Supojas Experiences of Giving Up Mathematics Learning: The Sociology of Curriculum Perspectives. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 27(3), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2019.27.3.145
  10. Kim, J, K. (1995). Gestalt psychotherapy. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  11. Kim, J, H. (2001). Systematic Mindfulness for Stress Management : Focusing on Mindfulness of the Emotion . Korean journal of health psychology, 6(1), 23-58.
  12. Do, J, W. (2018). Aspects of meta-affect in collaborative mathematical Problem-solving processes. Doctoral thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  13. Do, J, W., Paik, S, Y. (2019). Analysis of characteristics from meta-affect viewpoint on problem-solving activities of mathematically gifted children. The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 529-530.
  14. Lee, J, H. (2017). An Analysis of the Mathematics Subject Competency and Affective Characteristics in Mathematics Classes Using Drama-In-Education. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(21), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.21.687
  15. The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2015). A Research on the Actual Condition and I mpro v ement of Mathematics Learning. Research Report, 2015-12.
  16. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  17. Buck, R. (1999). The biological affects: a typology. Psychological Review, 106(2), 301-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.301
  18. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem-solving. In E. Pekhonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the PME 21, 2(pp. 209-216). University of Helsinki Dept. of Teacher Education.
  19. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
  20. de Corte, E., Depaepe, F., Eynde, P. & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Students' self-regulation of emotions in mathematics: An analysis of meta-emotional knowledge and skills. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education. 43. 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0333-6
  21. Fennema, E. (1989). The Study of Affect and Mathematics: A Proposed Generic Model for Research. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 205-219). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  22. Fitness, J., & Curtis, M. (2005). Emotional intelligence and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale: Relationships with empathy, attributional complexity, self-control, and responses to interpersonal conflict. E-Journal of Applied Psychology: Social section. 1(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.7790/ejap.v1i1.9
  23. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
  24. Garofalo, J. & Lester, F. K, Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
  25. Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and learning, 2(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0203_3
  26. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, Meta-Affect, and Mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  27. Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275-286). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  28. Goldin, G. A. (2004). Characteristics of affect as a system of representation. PME 28th Conference, (1), 109-114.
  29. Goldin, G. A. (2007). Affective pathways and structures in urban student's mathematical learning. In D. K. Pugalee, A. Rogerson, & A. Schinck (Eds.), Mathematics education in a global community: Proceeding of the 9th international conference on mathematics education (pp. 260-265). Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina.
  30. Goldin, G. A. (2010). Commentary on symbols and mediation in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education? (pp. 233-237). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  31. Goldin, G. A. (2014). Perspectives on emotion in mathematical engagement, learning, and problem solving. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 391-414). New York: Routledge.
  32. Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. M., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: Behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM: The International J ournal on Mathematics Education, 43, 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0348-z
  33. Goldin, G. A., Rosken, B., & Torner, G. (2009). Beliefs - no longer a hidden variable in mathematical teaching and learning processes. In J. Maass & W. Schloglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education (pp. 1-18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  34. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: why it can matter more than iq, New York: Bantam Books.
  35. Gomez-Chacon, I. M. (2000). Affective influence in the knowledge of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017518812079
  36. Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1989). Effects of marital discord on young children's peer interaction and health. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.25.3.373
  37. Hannula, M. S. (2001). The metalevel of cognition-emotion interaction. In M. Ahtee, O. Bjorkqvist, E. Pehkonen, & Vatanen (Eds.), Research on mathematics and science education: From beliefs to cognition, from problem solving to understanding (pp. 55-65). Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla printing house.
  38. Hannula, M. S. (2004). Affect in Mathematical Thinking and learning. SARJA - SER. BOSA-TOM. 273 HUMANIORA. TURUN YLIOPISTO, Turku 2004.
  39. Hannula, M. S., Op't Eynde, P., Schloglmann, W., & Malmo, T. W. (2007). Affect and mathematical thinking. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceeding of CERME-5 (pp. 202-207). Larnaca: University of Cyprus.
  40. Hooven, C., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. E. (1995). Parental meta-emotion structure predicts family and child outcomes. Cognition and Emotion, 9(2-3), 229-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409010
  41. Izard C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annu Rev Psychol. 60, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163539
  42. Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x
  43. Leder, G., & Grootenbore, P. J. (2005). Affect and mathematics education. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 17(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217413
  44. Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problem-solving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75-88). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  45. Long, P., Siemens, G., (2011). Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learing and Education. Educause Review, 46(5), 31-40.
  46. Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9022-8
  47. Mata, M., Monteiro, V., & Peixoto, F. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child Development Research, 2012, 876028.
  48. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
  49. McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.2307/749576
  50. McLeod, D. B., & Adams, V. M. (1989). Affects and Mathematical Problem Solving. Springer-Verlag, NY. McLeod, D.: 1992, 'Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization', in D.A. Grouws (ed), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, NY, 575-596.
  51. Passons, W. R. (1975). Gestalt approaches in counseling. New York: Holt.
  52. Roll, I. & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
  53. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
  54. Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Explorng emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125-154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  55. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1997). What is emotional intelligence. In P. Salovey and D. J. Sluyter (Eds.). Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implication. New York: Basic Books.
  56. Schloglmann, W. (2005). Meta-affect and strategies in mathematics learning. In M. Bosch (Ed), Proceeding of CERME - 4 (pp. 275-284). Barcelona: FundEmi IQS.
  57. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics. In A. G. Douglas (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teachning and Learning. a Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Macmillan, 334-370.
  58. Schorr, R. Y., & Goldin, G. A. (2008). Students' expression of affect in an inner-city SimCalc classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9117-5
  59. Swinkels, A., & Giuliano, T. A. (1995). The measurement and conceptualization of mood awareness: Attention directed toward one's mood states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 934-949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295219008
  60. Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1989). Affect and problem solving in an elementary school mathematics classroom. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 162-176). New York: Springer-Verlag.