DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Affecting Blood Loss During Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma

  • Urabe, Masayuki (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital) ;
  • Ohkura, Yu (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital) ;
  • Haruta, Shusuke (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital) ;
  • Ueno, Masaki (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital) ;
  • Udagawa, Harushi (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital)
  • Received : 2021.05.26
  • Accepted : 2021.08.05
  • Published : 2021.12.05

Abstract

Background: Major intraoperative hemorrhage reportedly predicts unfavorable survival outcomes following surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma (EC). However, the factors predicting the amount of blood lost during thoracoscopic esophagectomy have yet to be sufficiently studied. We sought to identify risk factors for excessive blood loss during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for EC. Methods: Using simple and multiple linear regression models, we performed retrospective analyses of the associations between clinicopathological/surgical factors and estimated hemorrhagic volume in 168 consecutive patients who underwent VATS-type esophagectomy for EC. Results: The median blood loss amount was 225 mL (interquartile range, 126-380 mL). Abdominal laparotomy (p<0.001), thoracic duct resection (p=0.014), and division of the azygos arch (p<0.001) were significantly related to high volumes of blood loss. Body mass index and operative duration, as continuous variables, were also correlated positively with blood loss volume in simple linear regression. The multiple linear regression analysis identified prolonged operative duration (p<0.001), open laparotomy approach (p=0.003), azygos arch division (p=0.005), and high body mass index (p=0.014) as independent predictors of higher hemorrhage amounts during VATS esophagectomy. Conclusion: As well as body mass index, operation-related factors such as operative duration, open laparotomy, and division of the azygos arch were independently predictive of estimated blood loss during VATS esophagectomy for EC. Laparoscopic abdominal procedures and azygos arch preservation might be minimally invasive options that would potentially reduce intraoperative hemorrhage, although oncological radicality remains an important consideration.

Keywords

References

  1. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2128-37. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1010705
  2. Abdelsattar ZM, Habermann E, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Rojas RL, Blackmon SH. Understanding failure to rescue after esophagectomy in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:865-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044
  3. Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O'Brien SM, Grab JD, Allen MS; Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:587-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.042
  4. Sugawara K, Yagi K, Uemura Y, et al. Associations of systemic inflammation and sarcopenia with survival of esophageal carcinoma patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:374-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.013
  5. Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200103000-00006
  6. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:791-800. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000143123.24556.1c
  7. Moon DH, Lee JM, Jeon JH, Yang HC, Kim MS. Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:3005-12. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.08.71
  8. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a series of 75 cases. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1588-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9019-z
  9. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4022
  10. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:911-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.060
  11. Meng F, Li Y, Ma H, Yan M, Zhang R. Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer. J Thorac Dis 2014;6:1218-24.
  12. Na KJ, Kang CH. Current issues in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;53:152-9. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.152
  13. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Haruta S, Tanaka T, Mizuno A, Ohkura Y. Re-evaluation of the role of thoracoscopic esophagectomy as a Japanese-style radical surgery. Esophagus 2017;14:165-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-016-0567-z
  14. Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1647-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.081
  15. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg 1978;188:606-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197811000-00004
  16. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C; International Union against Cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
  17. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Shinohara H, et al. Should lymph nodes along the thoracic duct be dissected routinely in radical esophagectomy? Esophagus 2014;11:204-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-014-0433-9
  18. Udagawa H, Akiyama H. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: Tokyo experience of the three-field technique. Dis Esophagus 2001;14:110-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00166.x
  19. Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, Hashimoto K, Nishigori T, Sakai Y. Simple technique of azygos arch division and retraction for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagus 2021;18:169-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00760-7
  20. Fujita H, Hawahara H, Yamana H, et al. Mediastinal lymphnode dissection procedure during esophageal cancer operation: carefully considered for preserving respiratory function. Jpn J Surg 1988;18:31-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02470843
  21. Pramesh CS, Mistry RC, Sharma S, Pantvaidya GH, Raina S. Bronchial artery preservation during transthoracic esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 2004;85:202-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20033
  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  23. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:152-62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805101
  24. Hasegawa T, Kubo N, Ohira M, et al. Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2686-y
  25. Melis M, Weber JM, McLoughlin JM, et al. An elevated body mass index does not reduce survival after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:824-31. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1336-1
  26. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:142-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30332-2
  27. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016;263:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346
  28. Yu S, Chen S, Han Z, et al. A useful method to keep azygos arch in minimally invasive resection of esophageal leiomyoma. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:4589-91. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.09.152
  29. Fujiwara N, Sato H, Miyawaki Y, et al. Effect of azygos arch preservation during thoracoscopic esophagectomy on facilitation of postoperative refilling. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:1079-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01994-w
  30. Butler H. The veins of the oesophagus. Thorax 1951;6:276-96. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.6.3.276