Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Electricity Distribution Tariff Regulation of Ukraine to Encourage Private Investment on the AMI

AMI 사업에 민간투자를 유인하기 위한 우크라이나 배전서비스 요금정책 연구

  • 김철년 (주식회사 케이티 글로벌사업본부)
  • Received : 2021.08.03
  • Accepted : 2021.11.20
  • Published : 2021.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A purpose of this study is to suggest distribution tariff regulation that encourages private investment on the energy efficiency industry of Ukraine. As the electricity market reform and the regulation introduction to encourage energy efficiency are ongoing in Ukraine, it is best time for Korean companies to enter to the market. Therefore, studies on the regulation and the market of Ukraine are required in advance. A simulation of private investment feasibility on AMI business is conducted on one of 32 DSOs in Ukraine. Through the simulation, the directions of RAB tariff regulation, which is the core of the distribution service tariff regulation, were derived. It is essential for DSOs to permit AMI lease assets, introduced by private investors, as regulated assets while other regulations are maintained as it is for investment. This study provides a practical basis by presenting objective data through simulation. It is expected to be helpful for overseas expansion of companies if the study is expanded to the various energy efficiency industries.

본 연구는 우크라이나 에너지효율화 분야 민간투자 활성화를 위한 배전서비스 요금정책의 제안을 목적으로 하였다. 우크라이나는 전력분야 시장 개편과 에너지효율화를 유도하기 위한 정책 도입으로 해당 분야 경쟁력이 높은 국내 기업들이 진출하기에 최적기로 정책과 시장에 대한 사전 연구가 필요하다. 우크라이나 32개 배전회사 중 한 곳을 선정하고 에너지효율화의 핵심인 AMI 도입을 민간투자로 진행할 경우를 가정하여 투자 경제성분석 시뮬레이션을 진행하여 배전서비스 요금정책 중 핵심적인 RAB 정책의 주요 내용의 방향을 도출하였다. 배전회사가 민간사업자로부터 도입하는 AMI 리스 자산에 대해 규제자산으로 인정이 필요하며, 기타 정책은 현재의 규정대로 적용되어도 투자 결정에는 크게 영향을 주지 않았다. 시뮬레이션을 통해 데이터를 제시함으로써 실무적 근거를 제공한 것에 연구의 의의가 있으며, 에너지효율화 분야들로 연구가 확장되면 기업들의 해외진출에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. KOTRA. (2019). Market Treads and Overseas Market Expansion Strategy of Smart Grid. Seoul: Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. https://news.kotra.or.kr/user/reports/kotranews/20/usrReportsView.do?reportsIdx=10694
  2. H. J. Park & J. Y. Eom. (2020. 1. 14). K-New Deal Global Strategy. Ministry of Science and ICT. https://www.msit.go.kr/bbs/view.do?sCode=user&mPid=112&mId=113&bbsSeqNo=94&nttSeqNo=3179811r
  3. N. G. Myoung, Y. H. Kim & S. Y. Lee. (2010). A Study on AMI System of KEPCO. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 35(8), 1251-1258.
  4. SAEE. (2013. 8. 11). Draft National Energy Efficiency Action Plan Through 2020. State Agency on Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine. https://www.saee.gov.ua/en/documents/147
  5. A. Schaal. (2020). Monitoring the Energy Strategy of Ukraine 2035. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/eurasia/competitiveness-programme/eastern-partners/Monitoring-the-energy-strategy-Ukraine-2035-EN-.pdf
  6. J. H. Jung & C. K. Seo. (2018). An Efficient Method for Meter Data Collection in AMI System. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communication and information Sciences, 43(8), 1311-1320. DOI : 10.7840/kics.2018.43.8.1311
  7. H. J. Kim. (2018). Analysis of World Smart Grid Market Ecosystem. Seoul: Korea Development Bank. https://rd.kdb.co.kr/index.jsp
  8. B. S. Kang & K. H. Lee. (2015). A Scheme on Energy Efficiency Through the Convergence of Micro-grid and Small Hydro Energy. Journal of The Korea Convergence Society, 6(1), 29-34. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.1.029
  9. R. R. Mohassel, A. Fung, F. Mohammadi & K. Raahemifar. (2014). A survey on Advanced Metering Infrastructure. Electrical Power and Energy System, 63, 473-484. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.06.025
  10. V. Giordano, I. Onyeji, L. Onyeji & G. Fulli. (2012). Guidelines for Cost Benefit Analysis of Smart Metering Deployment. Brussels: Joint Research Center of European Commission. https://ses.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/reports/guidelines-cost-benefit-analysis
  11. European Commission. (2015). Study on Cost Benefit Analysis of Smart Metering System in EU Member States. Athens: ICCS-NTUA & Madrid: AF Mercados EMI. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/studies_main/final_studiesstudy-cost-benefit-analysis-smart-metering-systems-eu-member-states_en
  12. IEA. (2020). Ukraine energy profile. Paris: International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/ukraine-energy-profile
  13. A. Schaal. (2019). Snapshot of Ukraine's Energy Sector - institutions, Governance and Policy Framework. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/eurasia/competitiveness-programme/eastern-partners/Snapshot-of-Ukraines-Energy-Sector-EN.pdf
  14. CEER. (2019). Report on Regulatory Frameworks for European Energy Networks. Brussels: Council of European Energy Regulators. https://www.ceer.eu/report-on-regulat-frameworks-for-european-energy-networks-2019#
  15. CEER. (2017). CEER Reoprt on Investment Conditions in European Countries. Brussels: Council of European Energy Regulators. https://www.ceer.eu/documents/104400/6147989/CEER+Report+on+Investment+Conditions+in+European+Countries/fbd6a80e-5825-d1f3-fe35-bb3682b40c98
  16. ECRB. (2019). Distribution tariff methodologies for electricity and gas in the Energy Community. Vienna: Energy Community. https://energy-community.org/dam/jcr:133949ca-deab-4d63-8f46-756fd4cf9aad/ECRB042019_DS_tariffs.pdf
  17. Energy Community Secretariat. (2021). on Assessment of NEURC's approach to regulatory assets based and incentive based regulation of distribution network tariffs in Ukraine. Vienna: Energy Community. https://www.euneighbours.eu/en/east/stay-informed/publications/assessment-neurcs-approach-regulatory-assets-based-and-incentive
  18. Energy Community Secretariat. (2018). Ukraine-assessment of regulations and methodologies for network tariff setting. Vienna: Energy Community. https://www.energy-community.org/dam/jcr:49de09fa-632a-4e1d-9feb-f93d95b1610d/ECS_CN_012018.pdf
  19. Ukraine government. (2020. 10. 22). About the statement of the Order of establishment (formation) of tariffs for services on distribution of electric energy. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v1175874-18#Text
  20. Y. C. You. (2008). A Study on Policy Development of Private Finance Initiative for Supplying Social Overhead Capital: Focused on the Case Studies of BTO(Build-Transfer- Operate) & BTL(Build-Transfer-Lease) Projects. Korean Policy Studies Review, 17(2), 1-32.
  21. Y. S. Park, S. P. Hong & J. H. Kim. (2019). Policy Tasks for Stimulating Private Investment Project. Seoul: Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea. http://www.cerik.re.kr/report/research/detail/2315
  22. D. P. Seo & B. S. Kim. (2020). A Study on Trend of Overseas Expansion Strategy Research. Journal of The Korea Convergence Society, 11(1), 279-284. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.1.279