DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Willingness to Manage Urban Parks by Age - Focusing on the Case of Incheon City Park -

연령별 시민참여형 도시공원 관리의지 비교 연구 -인천광역시 도시공원을 대상으로-

  • Yoo, Jae Seop (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, College of Urban Science, University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Jae Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, College of Urban Science, University of Seoul)
  • 유재섭 (서울시립대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 이재호 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2021.09.07
  • Accepted : 2021.11.16
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

For urban parks' rational and efficient management, research on creating green spaces in living area through citizen participation is continuously being conducted. However, in existing studies, citizens are recognized as a homogeneous group, and research on the intention to participate in park management according to user characteristics has not been conducted. A few studies have attempted to show differences through conceptual variables, such as user satisfaction and attachment to parks, but studies on sociodemographic factors, such as the users' age, have not been conducted. This study was conducted to ascertain the differences in preferred parks and park management participation methods by age, targeting various parks located in ten districts of Incheon Metropolitan City. Regression analysis was performed after collecting 1,226 questionnaires, applying a population-proportional allocation in the ten districts. As a result of the study, it was found that the difference according to the age of users has the most influence on the willingness to manage the park rather than the satisfaction or other factors. Also, a chi-square analysis was conducted to find the differences in preferred urban parks and management methods by age. The results showed that the choice to manage parks was statistically higher for those in their 50s or older, and the differences in preferred park types and desired park greening methods suggested implications for park management plans by age.

도시공원의 합리적이고 효율적인 관리를 위해 시민참여를 통한 생활권 녹지 조성방안에 대한 연구가 지속적으로 이뤄지고 있지만, 기존의 연구에서는 시민을 동일한 성격의 집단으로 인식하고 이용자의 특성 차이에 따른 공원관리 참여에 대한 연구는 진행되지 않고 있다. 특히 기존의 연구는 이용자의 만족도나 애착심과 같은 개념적인 변수를 통한 차이만 보고자 하였고, 이용자의 연령과 같은 사회인구학적 요소에 대한 연구는 아직까지 수행되지 않고 있다. 이러한 연구의 한계점을 가지고 본 연구는 인천광역시의 10개 구·군에 광역적으로 존재하는 도시공원을 대상으로 연령별 선호하는 공원과 공원관리 참여방법의 차이에 대한 연구를 진행하였다. 인천시 거주주민과 공무원을 대상으로 하였고, 10개 구·군에 인구 비례 할당을 적용하여 총 1,226부의 설문을 걷어 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 연구결과, 만족도 및 다른 요인보다 이용자의 연령에 따른 차이가 공원관리 의지에 가장 영향을 많이 미친다는 결과를 얻었고, 이를 바탕으로 연령별 선호하는 도시공원 및 관리방법 차이를 알아내기 위해 카이스퀘어 분석을 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 젊은층보다는 50대이상의 연령층이 공원관리 의지가 통계적으로 높음이 확인되었으며 선호하는 공원유형과 희망하는 공원녹지화 방법에 대한 차이를 통해 연령별 공원관리방안에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, M. G., and Y. R. Kim(2013) Development of urban park supply alternatives considering the equity evaluation of urban park service: Focused on Cheongju City. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 49-66.
  2. Byeon, J. S., I. H. Kim and S. H. Shin(2011) An institutional approach for application of the contracting-out in city parks - Focused on the case study of city park management of Seongnam City -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(5): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.5.033
  3. Chang, H. J. (2014) Program and Space Design of Seafront Park Considering Landscape Management -A Case Study on Jinhaeru Seafront park- Master dissertation, Graduate School of Seoul National University).
  4. Cho, W. R. (2012) A Study on the Effect of Place Attachment on Park Management in Citizen Participatory Community Park. Master Dissertation, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  5. da Schio, N., A. Phillips, K. Fransen, M. Wolff, D. Haase, S. K. Ostoic, and R. De Vreese(2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of and attitudes towards urban forests and green spaces: Exploring the instigators of change in Belgium. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 127305.
  6. Guo, S., C. Song, T. Pei, Y. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Du, J. Chen, Z. Fan, X. Tang, Y. Peng and Y. Wang (2019) Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: Perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103642
  7. Ha, H. G. (2020) Changes in citizen participation policy in park and green administration: Focusing on Seoul, Incheon, Daegu, Ulsan, and Busan. GRI Review 22(4): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7202/1072509ar
  8. Kaiser, H. (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1): 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  9. Kim, G. J. (2012) Welfare activation strategy for a urban park users. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 12(10): 195-204. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.10.195
  10. Kim, J. H. (2015) A comparative research on citizen participation administration for good governance in large cities: Focusing on supporting policies for community building projects in Busan and Seoul. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies 18(4):135-170.
  11. Kim, J. T., and J. H. Cho(2011) Recognition difference of local residents and tourists to urban park operation and management -With a special reference to the Wolmi Park in Incheon-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 25: 432-441.
  12. Kim, K. H. (2003) Citizen participation in urban design: A need to create private not-for-profit organizations. Journal of Environmental Studies 41(4): 79-98.
  13. Kim, M., J. Shim, H. Kim and Y. G. Kim(2009) A study of the management subject and the park user's mind for activating citizen's participation in the Seoul Forest Park management. Journal of Korea Planners Association 44(1): 223-234.
  14. Kim, S. K., and J. H. Lee(2019) A study on the park components affecting the satisfaction of park usage by user groups - Based on the analysis of the 2018 satisfaction survey of Hangang Park users -. Journal of the Korea Landscape Council 11(2): 21-33. https://doi.org/10.36466/SSW.21.1.2
  15. Kim, Y. I., J. G. Kim, J. S. An and A. H. Choi (2010). Citizen satisfaction model for urban parks and greens - A transactional approach in the case of Anyang City, Korea -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 38(3), 62-74.
  16. Kim, Y. K., and G. M. Nam (2019). A study on factors influencing the residents' participation of urban regeneration: Focused on the mediating effect of place attachment. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 30(3), 43-65.
  17. Kwon, J. J., D. H. Kim and H. Y. Hwang(2011) A dynamic analyses on the influences of the governance decisions for Cheong-ju Won-heungi Eco-Park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(1): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.065
  18. Lee, D. Y.(2013) Influence Factors on Satisfaction with and Participating Attitude in Volunteer Work in Management of Urban Parks: Focused on Seoul Forest Volunteer Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  19. Lee, J. H.(2021) Differences in park use behavior and perception between groups by frequency of visit through comparison of Yangju Urban Parks in 2014 and 2020. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 49(2): 41-50.
  20. Lee, J. H. and S. K. Kim(2018) Extraction of essential design elements for urban parks - Based on the analysis of 2017 satisfaction survey of park Use in Seoul -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 46(6): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.6.041
  21. Ly, T. P. and H. Xiao(2016) An innovative model of park governance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Ecotourism 15(2): 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2016.1145227
  22. Mertens, L., J. Van Cauwenberg, J. Veitch, B. Deforche and D. Van Dyck(2019) Differences in park characteristic preferences for visitation and physical activity among adolescents: A latent class analysis. PLOS ONE 14(3): e0212920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212920
  23. Nam, J. V. and H. Kim(2019) Differential levels of governance and its impact on urban park management and users' satisfaction - The case of sheffield district parks, UK -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 47(4): 50-60. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.4.050
  24. Park, J. G. (2012) Strategy on the formation of the regional community-focus on the case of Cheonan. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 12(7): 183-193. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.07.183
  25. Son, S. R. and B. G. Yoon(2002) A study on open space policy based on urban residents' values of open space. Journal of Korea Planning Association 37(4): 59-81.
  26. Son, Y. H. (2011) Study on the meaning of national urban park system and the challenging in management operations - Focusing on the case of Japanese national government park system. Journal of Korea Planning Association 46(3): 79-92.
  27. Subramanian, D. and A. Jana(2018) Assessing urban recreational open spaces for the elderly: A case of three Indian cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 35: 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.015
  28. Sundevall, E. P. and M. Jansson(2020) Inclusive parks across ages: Multifunction and urban open space management for children, adolescents, and the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(24): 9357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249357
  29. Wen, C., C. Albert and C. Von Haaren(2020) Equality in access to urban green spaces: A case study in Hannover, Germany, with a focus on the elderly population. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening 55: 126820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126820
  30. Yoon, J. I., and J. H. Kim(2020) The influence of the perception of restorative environment on place attachment for visitors to Han River Park: Grounded on attention restoration theory. Korean Journal of Lesure, Recreation & Park 44(3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2020.9.44.3.1