DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

심근 세포의 전기생리학적 특징을 이용한 인공 신경망 기반 약물의 심장독성 평가

An Artificial Neural Network-Based Drug Proarrhythmia Assessment Using Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cardiomyocytes

  • 유예담 (금오공과대학교 IT융복합공학과) ;
  • 정다운 (금오공과대학교 IT융복합공학과) ;
  • ;
  • 임기무 (금오공과대학교 메디컬 IT융합공학과)
  • Yoo, Yedam (Dept of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Jeong, Da Un (Dept of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Marcellinus, Aroli (Dept of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lim, Ki Moo (Dept of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.10
  • 심사 : 2021.12.29
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31

초록

Cardiotoxicity assessment of all drugs has been performed according to the ICH guidelines since 2005. Non-clinical evaluation S7B has focused on the hERG assay, which has a low specificity problem. The comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) project was initiated to correct this problem, which presented a model for classifying the Torsade de pointes (TdP)-induced risk of drugs as biomarkers calculated through an in silico ventricular model. In this study, we propose a TdP-induced risk group classifier of artificial neural network (ANN)-based. The model was trained with 12 drugs and tested with 16 drugs. The ANN model was performed according to nine features, seven features, five features as an individual ANN model input, and the model with the highest performance was selected and compared with the classification performance of the qNet input logistic regression model. When the five features model was used, the results were AUC 0.93 in the high-risk group, AUC 0.73 in the intermediate-risk group, and 0.92 in the low-risk group. The model's performance using qNet was lower than the ANN model in the high-risk group by 17.6% and in the low-risk group by 29.5%. This study was able to express performance in the three risk groups, and it is a model that solved the problem of low specificity, which is the problem of hERG assay.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 금오공과대학교 학술연구비에 의하여 연구된 논문 임 (2021).

참고문헌

  1. Roden DM, "Cellular basis of drug-induced torsades de pointes", Br. J. Pharmacol., 2008;154:1502-1507, doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.238.
  2. Shah RR, "Drugs, QTc interval prolongation and final ICH E14 guideline: An important milestone with challenges ahead", Drug Saf., 2005;28(11):1009-1028, doi:10.2165/00002018- 200528110-00003.
  3. Cavero I, Crumb W, "ICH S7B draft guideline on the nonclinical strategy for testing delayed cardiac repolarisation risk of drugs: A critical analysis", Expert Opin. Drug Saf., 2005;4(3):509-530, doi:10.1517/14740338.4.3.509.
  4. Strauss DG, et al., "Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) Update from a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium / Health and Environmental Sciences Institute / FDA Meeting", Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci., 2019;53(4):519-525, doi: 10.1177/2168479018795117.
  5. Colatsky T, et al., "The Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative - Update on progress", J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, 2016;81:15-20, doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.002.
  6. Dutta S, et al., "Optimization of an in silico cardiac cell model for proarrhythmia risk assessment", Front. Physiol., 2017;8:1-15, doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00616.
  7. O'Hara T, Virag L, Varro A, Rudy Y, "Simulation of the undiseased human cardiac ventricular action potential: Model formulation and experimental validation", PLoS Comput. Biol., 2011;7(5), doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002061.
  8. Li Z, et al., "Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative", Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2019:105(2):466-475, doi: 10.1002/cpt.1184.
  9. Llopis-Lorente J, Gomis-Tena J, Cano J, Romero L, Saiz J, Trenor B, "InSilico Classifiers for the Assessment of Drug Proarrhythmicity", J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2020;60(10):5172-5187, doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00201.
  10. Lancaster MC, Sobie EA, "Improved Prediction of Drug-Induced Torsades de Pointes Through Simulations of Dynamics and Machine Learning Algorithms", Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2016;100(4):371-379, doi:10.1002/cpt.367.
  11. Ismail WN, Hassan MM, Alsalamah HA, Fortino G, "CNNbased health model for regular health factors analysis in internetof-medical things environment", IEEE Access, 2020;8:52541-52549, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980938.
  12. Chang KC, et al., "Uncertainty quantification reveals the importance of data variability and experimental design considerations for in silico proarrhythmia risk assessment", Front. Physiol., 2017;8:1-17, doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00917.
  13. Hwang M, Lim C-H, Leem CH, Shim EB, "In silico models for evaluating proarrhythmic risk of drugs", APL Bioeng., 2020;4(2):021502, doi:10.1063/1.5132618.
  14. Simundic AM, "Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions", Ejifcc, 2009:19(4);203-211.
  15. Li Z, et al., "General Principles for the Validation of Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Models: An Extension of the CiPA In Silico Strategy", Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2020;107(1):102-111, doi:10.1002/cpt.1647.