DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Metadiscourse in the Bank Negara Malaysia Governor's Speech Texts

  • Received : 2021.09.14
  • Accepted : 2021.12.07
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

The study aims to explore the use of metadiscourse in the Bank Negara Malaysia Governor's speeches based on Hyland's Interpersonal Model of Metadiscourse. The corpus data consist of 343 speech texts, which were extracted from the Malaysian Corpus of Financial English (MacFE), amounting to 688,778 tokens. Adopting both quantitative and qualitative approaches to data analysis the study investigates (1) the overall use of metadiscourse in the Bank Negara Governor's speech texts and (2) the functions of the most prominent metadiscourse resources used and their functions in the speech texts. The findings reveal that the Governor's speech texts to be interactional rather than interactive, revealing a rich distribution of interactional metadiscourse resources, namely engagement markers, self-mention, hedges, boosters and attitude markers throughout the texts. The interactional metadiscourse resources function to establish speaker-audience engagement and alignment of views, as well as to express degree of uncertainty and certainty and attitudes. The study concludes that the speech texts are not merely informational or propositional, but rather interpersonal.

Keywords

References

  1. Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  2. Adel, A., & Maurenan, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215
  3. Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrio-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011
  4. Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
  5. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
  6. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
  7. Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
  8. Desma, P. A., & Ingatan, G. (2020). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in Jacinda Ardern speech at Christchurch Memorial. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i2.594
  9. Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2007). Communication by Central Bank committee members: Different strategies, same effectiveness? Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 39(2/3), 509-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2879.2007.00034.x
  10. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
  11. Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text & Talk, 18(3), 349-382.
  12. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 241-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
  13. Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
  14. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
  15. Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  16. Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in scholastic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  17. Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). "In this paper we suggest": Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
  18. Kuswoyo, H., & Siregar, R. A. (2019). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in oral business presentation. Lingua Cultura, 13(4), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i4.5882
  19. Mauranen, A. (1993a). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  20. Nan, Y., & Liu, L. (2013). Investigating the interpersonal and textual meaning of Steve Jobs' Stanford speech in terms of Hyland's Metadiscourse Theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(4), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20130104.12
  21. Roslan, S., Roslina, A. A., Noli, N., Mohd. R. I., & Norzie, D. B. (2018). The development of the Malaysian Corpus of Financial English, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(3), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1803-05
  22. Sukma, B. P. (2017). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama's 2012 campaign speeches. Aksara, 29(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v29i2.82.283-292
  23. Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58
  24. Vande Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
  25. Yuting, Z. (2018) An intercultural analysis of personal metadiscourse in English and Chinese commencement. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(5), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.5p.100