항공우주시스템공학회지 (Journal of Aerospace System Engineering)

  • 제15권6호
  • /
  • Pages.33-41
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1976-6300(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-7150(eISSN)
항공우주시스템공학회 (The Society for Aerospace System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Factors Affecting Drone Use Intention -Comparative analysis of Korea and United Kingdom

  • 투고 : 2021.08.30
  • 심사 : 2021.10.23
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As interest in drones controlled by remote technology rapidly increases worldwide, drones are used in many fields such as military, rescue, and transportation as future innovations in many countries. In particular, as the drone has been spotlighted as a new future strategic industry, it is also used for public purposes such as disaster relief and crime investigation. However, security concerns such as the penetration of major national facilities, collisions with aircraft, and the possibility of privacy infringement due to aerial photography are also being raised. Unlike the increased interest in drones, there have been few studies on drone use, drone safety, and public attitudes toward drone use. This paper analyzed the perceptions of drone attitudes, drone stability and policy support for drones for Korean and United Kingdom.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allan, Bromley. (2004) Technology policy, Technology in Society 26, pp. 455-468.
  2. Ajzen, I.and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Davis, F. D.(1989), "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  4. Featherman, M. S.,and Pavlou, P. A. (2003), "Predicting e-services adopt on: a perceived risk facets perspective," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), pp. 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
  5. Hassanalian, M., and Abdelkefi. A. (2017), "Progres in Aerospace Science; Classificstions, application, and design challenges of drones", Areview 91 pp 99-131.
  6. Hilton, T., Hughes, T.,Little, E., and Marandi, E. (2013), "Adopting Self-Service Technology To Do More With Less." Journal of Services Marketing 27 (1):pp 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041311296338
  7. Igbaria, M., Gumimaraes T., and Davis, G. B. (1995)" Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model" Journal of Management Information System, Vol 11, No4, pp87-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518061
  8. IRS Global (2018), "Market outlook and core technology development strategies for unmanned mobile vehicles " IRS Global, 2018, p607.
  9. IRS Global (2019), "Technology development trends and business prospects of autonomous objects, drones centered" IRS Global, 2019 p5.
  10. Kreps, S. (2014), "Flying under the radar: A study of public attitudes towards unmanned aerial vehicles" Research and Policy vol 1, no 1,pp1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(71)90002-3
  11. Kwon, G. (2016), "A Comparative Study on th UK Legislation of Post-Human Technologies" Focused on Drone and Autonomous Driving Vehicle.
  12. Kwon, H. S.(2017) " Study on the Domestic and Commercial Drone Ecosystem: Focusing on the Analysis of the Actor Network", Doctoral Thesis, Graduate School, Korea University.
  13. Kwon, Y. S. (2019) "A Study on the Use and Limitations of Drones in Crime Prevention and Investigation" Korean Law Association 2019.3 pp255-272.
  14. Lee, H.-Y. and Cha, S.-M. (2016), "Comparative Study of Drone Policy," Journal of Korean Comparative Government, 20 (4). pp.305-324.
  15. Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C. S., and Wang, K.(2008) Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data servicesin China", Information & Management, Vol. 45.
  16. Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C. and Yao, J.(2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy,1 3(3), pp. 206~222. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240310478222
  17. Miethe, T. D., Lieberman, J. D, Sakiyama, M. and Troshynski, E. (2014), " Public Attitudes about Aerial Drone Activities: Results of a National Survey."Research in Brief June 2014., CCJP 2014-02. Center For Crime And Justice Policy.
  18. Mallat, N. (2007), Exploring Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payments -A Qualitative Study. Journal of Strategy.
  19. Park, I., and Kang, H. (2007), "A study on the effect of potential variables on the use and satisfaction of digital cable TV audiences, acceptance of digital cable," Korean Society of Broadcasting No. 21-6, 11, pp156-192.
  20. Ramadan, Z. B., Farah, M. H., and Mrad, M. (2017), "An adapted TPB approach to consumers' acceptance of service-delivery drones" Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(7), pp 817-828, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1242720
  21. Rogers, E. M. (2003), "Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.)". New York, NY: Free Press, pp1-5.
  22. Roh, K.-S. (2016), "Thesis Statistical Analysis SPSS & AMOS", Hanbit Academy.
  23. Terance D.. Miethe, Joel D., Lieberman, M. S. and E. I. Troshynski(2014) ;"Public Attitude about Aerial Drone Activities: Resuits of National Survey" UNIV .
  24. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2016), "Technology acceptance model 3 andA research agenda on interventions," Decision Sciences, 39, pp. 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  25. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008), "Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions," Decision Sciences, 39, pp. 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  26. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2012), "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model:Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  27. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2003), "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model : Four longitudinal field studies," Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  28. Yoon, C.-G and Hwang, C.-H. (2019), "Early Adopters: An Analysis of the Effect of Organizational Characteristics on the Early Innovation Acceptance" Korean Journal of Public Administration 53 (2) pp 35-59. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.53.2.35