Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제21권5호
  • /
  • Pages.489-503
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of shear wall design on performance and cost of RC buildings in moderate seismic regions

  • Mahmoud, Sayed (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Salman, Alaa (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.13
  • 심사 : 2021.05.17
  • 발행 : 2021.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This research aims to investigate the seismic response of RC shear wall buildings of 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10-story designed as conventional and ductile and located in moderate seismic zone in Saudi Arabia in accordance with the seismic provisions of the American code ASCE-7-16. Dynamic analysis is conducted using the developed models in ETABS and the design spectra of the selected zone. The seismic responses of a number of design variations are evaluated in terms of story displacements, drift, shear and moments of both conventional and ductile building models as performance measures and presented comparatively. In addition, pushover analysis is also performed for the lowest and highest building models. Cost estimate of ductile and conventional walls is evaluated and compared to each other in terms of weight of reinforcement bars. In addition, due to the complexity of design and installation of ductile shear walls, sensitivity analysis is performed as well. It is observed that conventional design considerably increases induced seismic responses as well as cost compared to ductile one.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdel Raheem, S.E., Ahmed, M.M.M., Ahmed, M.M. and Abdel-Shafy, A.G.A. (2018a), "Evaluation of plan configuration irregularity effects on seismic response demands of L-shaped MRF buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16(9), 3845-3869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7.
  2. Eusuf, M.A., Rashid, K.A., Noor, W.M. and Al Hasan, A. (2013), "Shear wall construction in buildings: A conceptual framework on the aspect of analysis and design", Appl. Mech. Mater., 268, 706-711. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.268-270.706.
  3. ACI (American Concrete Institute) (2014), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI314M-14, Farmington Hills.
  4. Aly, N. and Galal, K. (2020), "Effect of ductile shear wall ratio and cross-section configuration on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete masonry shear wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 146(4), 04020020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002542.
  5. ASCE/SEI (Structural Engineering Institute) (2016), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE7-116, Reston, VA.
  6. El-Sokkary, H. and Galal, K. (2018), "Effect of preliminary selection of RC shear walls' ductility level on material quantities", Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater., 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0273-4.
  7. Elwardany, H., Seleemah, A. and Jankowski, R. (2017), "Seismic pounding behaviour of multi-story buildings in series considering the effect of infill panels", Eng. Struct. 144(1), 1201-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.078.
  8. ETABS Ultimate (2020), Version 19.0 Computers and Structures, Inc., CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS SAFE and CSiBridge
  9. Favvata, J.M., Karayannis, C.G. and Liolios. A.A. (2009), "Influence of exterior joint effect on the inter-story pounding interaction of structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(2):113-136. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.2.113.
  10. Favvata, J. M., Naoum M. C. Karayannis, C.G. (2013). "Limit states of RC structures with first floor irregularities." Struct Eng Mech. 47(6), 791-818. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.6.791
  11. Filiatrault, A., Lachapelle, E. and Lamontagne, P. (1998), "Seismic performance of ductile and nominally ductile reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. I. Experimental study", Can. J. Civil Eng., 25(2), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1139/l97-097.
  12. Filiatrault, A., Lachapelle, E. and Lamontagne, P. (1998), "Seismic performance of ductile and nominally ductile reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. I. Experimental study", Can. J. Civil Eng, 25(2), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1139/l97-097.
  13. Galal, K. and El-Sokkary, H. (2008), "Analytical evaluation of seismic performance of RC frames rehabilitated using FRP for increased ductility of members", J. Perform. Construct. Fac., 22(5), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(276).
  14. Hanna, A.S., Camlic, R. and Peterson, P.A. (2002), "Quantitative definition of projects impacted by change orders", J. Construct. Eng. M., 128(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(57).
  15. Heidebrecht, A. and Naumoski, N. (1999), "Seismic performance of ductile medium height reinforced concrete frame buildings design in accordance with the provisions of the 1995 National Building Code of Canada", Can. J. Civil Eng., 26(5), 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1139/l99-020.
  16. Izzuddin B.A., Karayannis, C.G. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Advanced nonlinear formulation for reinforced concrete beam-columns", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2913-2934. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2913).
  17. Karayannis, C.G., Izzuddin, B.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Application of adaptive analysis to reinforced concrete frames", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2935-2957. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2935).
  18. Kermanshachi, S. and Rouhanizadeh, B. (2019), "Sensitivity analysis of construction schedule performance due to increased change orders and decreased labor productivity", In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC). 12-15.
  19. Kumar, B. (2014). "Shear walls - A review." Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol, 3(2), 9691-9694.
  20. Mahmoud, S. Genidy, M. and Tahoon, H. (2017), "Time-history analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings with soft storeys", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 42(3), 1201-12017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2366-1.
  21. Navon, R., Shapira, A. and Shechori, Y. (2000), "Automated rebar constructability diagnosis", J. Construct. Eng. Manage., 126(5), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:5(389)
  22. Paulay, T. and Williams, R.L. (1980), "The analysis and design of and the evaluation of design actions for reinforced concrete ductile shear wall structures", Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthq. Eng., 13(2), 108-143. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.13.2.108-143
  23. Rochette, P. and Labossiere, P. (2000), "Axial testing of rectangular column models confined with composites", J. Compos. Construct., 4(3), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(129).
  24. Sadjadi, R., Kianoush, M. and Talebi, S. (2007). "Seismic performance of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames", Eng. Struct., 29(9), 2365-2380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.029.
  25. Saiful Islam, A.B.M. and Sodangi, M. (2020), "Rubber bearing isolation for structures prone to earthquake - a cost effectiveness analysis", Earthq. Struct., 19(4), 261-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.4.261.
  26. Sambasivan, M. and Soon, W.Y. (2007). "Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry", Int. J. Proj. Manag., 25(5), 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.007.
  27. Song, Y. and Chua, D.K. (2006), "Modeling of functional construction requirements for constructability analysis", J. Construct. Eng. Manag., 132(12), 1314-1326. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:12(1314)
  28. Taylor, T. and Ford, D.N. (2008), "Managing tipping point dynamics in complex construction projects", J. Construct. Eng. Manag, 134(6), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:6(421).