DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A reliability-based approach to investigate the challenges of using international building design codes in developing countries

  • Kakaie, Arman (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan) ;
  • Yazdani, Azad (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan) ;
  • Salimi, Mohammad-Rashid (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan)
  • Received : 2021.07.04
  • Accepted : 2021.09.29
  • Published : 2021.12.25

Abstract

The building design codes and standards in many countries usually are either fully or partially adopted from the international codes. However, regional conditions like the quality of construction industry and different statistical parameters of load and resistance have essential roles in the code calibration of building design codes. This paper presents a probabilistic approach to assess the reliability level of adopted national building codes by simulating design situations and considering all load combinations. The impact of the uncertainty of wind and earthquake loads, which are entirely regional condition dependent and have a high degree of uncertainty, are quantified. In this study, the design situation is modeled by generating thousands of numbers for load effect ratios, and the reliability level of steel elements for all load combinations and different load ratios is established and compared to the target reliability. This approach is applied to the Iranian structural steel code as a case study. The results indicate that the Iranian structural steel code lacks safety in some load combinations, such as gravity and earthquake load combinations, and is conservative for other load combinations. The present procedure can be applied to the assessment of the reliability level of other national codes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for comments that helped to improve the article.

References

  1. ACI (2002), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318-02, Chicago, Illinois.
  2. AISC (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC 360-10, Chicago, Illinois.
  3. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, Virginia.
  4. Bartlett, F.M., Hong, H.P. and Zhou, W. (2003), "Load factor calibration for the proposed 2005 edition of the national building code of Canada: Companion-action load combinations", Can. J. Civil Eng., 30(2), 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1139/l02-086.
  5. Bartlett, F.M., Dexter, R.J., Graeser, M.D., Jelinek, J.J., Schmidt, B.J. and Galambos, T.V. (2003), "Updating standard shape material properties database for design and reliability", Eng. J., 40(1), 2-14.
  6. Beck, A.T. and Souza Jr, A.C.D. (2010), "A first attempt towards reliabilitybased calibration of brazilian structural design codes", J. Brazil. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 32(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782010000200004.
  7. BHRC (2013a), Design and Construction of Steel Structures, INBC 10, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  8. BHRC (2013b), Design Loads for Buildings, INBC 6, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  9. BHRC (2014), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800, 4th Edition, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  10. Bjorhovde, R (1972), "Deterministic and probabilistic approaches to the strength of steel columns", Lehigh University.
  11. Bonstrom, H.L. and Corotis, R.B. (2012), "Structural reliability and sustainable resilience", Structures Congress 2012, 2268-2278.
  12. Cao, R., Sun, Z., Wang, J. and Guo, F. (2021), "An efficient reliability analysis strategy for low failure probability problems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 78(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.78.2.209.
  13. CEN (2005), Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, EN 1993-1-1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  14. CSA (2004), Design of Concrete Structures, CSA A23.3-04, Mississauga, Ontario.
  15. Cornell, C.A. (1968), "Engineering seismic risk analysis. bulletin of the seismological society of America", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58(5), 1583-1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583
  16. Davenport, A.G (2000), "Comparison of seismic and windstorm hazards", Proceedings of the 6th Environmental Specialty Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 7-10.
  17. Ellingwood, B. (1985), "Probability-based load criteria for structural design", A Century of Excellence in MEASUREMENTS, STANDARDS, and TECHNOLOGY, CRC Press.
  18. Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T.V., MacGregor, J.G. and Cornell, C.A. (1980), "Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58", NBS Special Publication 577, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
  19. Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J.G., Galambos, T.V. and Cornell, C.A. (1982), "Probability based load criteria: Load factors and load combinations", ASCE J. Struct. Div., 108(ST5), 978-997. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdeag.0005959.
  20. Ellingwood, B.R. and Tekie, P.B. (1999), "Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 453-663. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:4(453).
  21. Ellingwood, B. and Rosowsky, D. (1996), "Combining snow and earthquake loads for limit states design", J. Struct. Eng., 122(11), 1364-1368. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:11(1364).
  22. Faber, M.H. and Sorensen, J.D. (2002), "Reliability based code calibration", Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration. Press Release, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
  23. Feng, Q., Sun, K. and Chen, H.P. (2021), "Reliability-based assessment of high-speed railway subgrade defect", Struct. Eng. Mech., 77(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.2.231.
  24. Fryer, M.J. and Rubinstein, R.Y. (1983), Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, Vol. 146, John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Galambos, T.V (1983), "Reliability of axially loaded columns", Eng. Struct., 5(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(83)90043-3.
  26. Galambos, T.V., Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J.G. and Cornell, C.A. (1982), "Probability based load criteria: assessment of current design practice", ASCE J. Struct. Div., 108(ST5), 959-977. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdeag.0005958.
  27. Ghasemi, S.H. and Lee, J.Y. (2021a), "Reliability-based indcator for post-earthquake traffic flow capacity of a highway bridge", Struct. Saf., 89, 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102039.
  28. Ghasemi, S.H. and Lee, J.Y. (2021b), "Measuring instantaneous resilience of a highway bridge subjected to earthquake events", Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Tran. Res. Board, 2675(9), 1681-1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211009546.
  29. Ghasemi, S.H. and Nowak, A.S. (2017), "Reliability index for non-normal distributions of limit state functions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 62(3), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.3.365.
  30. Ghasemi, S.H. and Nowak, A.S. (2017), "Target reliability for bridges with consideration of ultimate limit state", Eng. Struct., 152, 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2017.09.012.
  31. Gholipour, Y., Bozorgnia, Y., Rahnama, M., Berberian, M. and Shojataheri, J. (2008), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis phase I- greater Tehran region final report", Facult. Eng. Univ. Tehran, 32(1), 35-52.
  32. Mahachi, J. (2018), "Calibration of partial resistance factors for cold-formed steel in South Africa", 1-9.
  33. Mahmoudkalayeh, S. and Mahsuli, M. (2021), "Ramifications of blind adoption of load and resistance factors in building codes: reliability-based assessment", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 19(2), 963-986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01015-7.
  34. Meimand, V.Z. and Schafer, B.W. (2014), "Impact of load combinations on structural reliability determined from testing cold-formed steel components", Struct. Saf., 48, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.10.006.
  35. Nadol'skiy, V.V.E., Holicky, M. and Sykora, M. (2013), "Comparison of reliability levels provided by the Eurocodes and standards of the republic of Belarus", Вестник Мгсу, 2(2), 7-21.
  36. National Research Council of Canada (2005), National Building Code of Canada, NBCC-2005, Ottawa, Canada.
  37. Nowak, A.S. and Collins, K.R. (2012), Reliability of Structures, CRC Press.
  38. PDSPC (2008), President Deputy Strategic Planning and Control-Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Iran, Tehran, Iran. https://iranhazard.mporg.ir/PageItem.aspx?p=IntroPage.
  39. Ravindra, M.K. and Galambos, T.V. (1978), "Load and resistance factor design for steel", J. Struct. Div., 104(9), 1337-1353. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004981
  40. Rosenblueth, E. and Esteva, L. (1972), "Reliability basis for some Mexican Codes", ACI Spec. Publ., 31, 1-42.
  41. Safari, M., Ghasemi, S.H. and Taghia, S.A.H.S. (2021), "Target reliability analysis of bridge piers concerning the earthquake extreme event limit state", Eng. Struct., 245, 112910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112910.
  42. Sakka, Z.I., Assakkaf, I.A. and Qazweeni, J.S. (2018), "Reliability-based assessment of damaged concrete buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 65(6), 751-760. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.6.751.
  43. Salimi, M.R. and Yazdani, A. (2018), "Reliability-based fragility analysis of nonlinear structures under the actions of random earthquake loads", Struct. Eng. Mech., 66(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.1.075.
  44. Soltani, M.H., Ghasemi, S.H., Soltani, A., Lee, J.Y., Nowak, A.S. and Jalilkhani, M. (2020), "State-of-the-art reliability analysis of structural drift control corresponding to the critical excitations", J. Earthq. Eng., 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1798829.
  45. Turkstra, C.J (1972), "Theory and structural design decision. solid mechanics study, No. 2", University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.