Journal of KIBIM (한국BIM학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling (한국BIM학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A case study of digital twin construction based on geospatial building information modeling (GeoBIM) - Focusing on the case of Jaeamcheon-gul and Jeonggusu-gul in Jeju Island -

지하공간건설정보모델링(GeoBIM) 기반의 디지털 트윈 구축사례에 관한 연구 - 제주도 재암천굴, 정구수굴 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2021.12.14
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the era of the 4th industrial revolution, smart construction is actively researched, in the domestic construction field, and one of the key elements in this field is Building Information Modeling(BIM). In Korea, smart construction is being implemented through BIM-based digitization and intelligence. The geotechnical engineering field should also prepare for the introduction of BIM. In this study, the concept and application status of GeoBIM were identified, and the direction of future research was presented. This study is a part of the study "Establishment of GeoBIM-based Digital Twin Maintenance System" in the current "Technology Development for Establishment of Jeju Ground Collapse Response System for Safe Road Operation". The subject and scope of the study is continuous excavation at caves located under roads in Jeju Island, and initial research is being conducted on Jaeamcheon-gul and Jeonggusu-gul. This study aims to build a digital twin through individual data construction and integration processes such as cave shape modeling using laser scanners, 3D stratum modeling using borehole information and geophysical exploration data, and modeling of surrounding conditions using drones.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국건설기술연구원 임무형 주요사업(도로 안전운영을 위한 제주형 지반함몰 대응체계 개발(2/3), 20210193-001)의 지원으로 수행되었으며 이에 깊은 감사를 드립니다.

References

  1. An, J. S., Kim, W., Hwang, S. H. (2021). A study on the concept and application status of geotechnical building info rmation modeling (GeoBIM), Korean Society of Geotechnical Engineering. KSGE 2021 Fall Symposium, pp. 263-264.
  2. Beaufils, M., Grellet, S., Le Hello, B., Lorentz, J., Beaudouin, M., Moreno, J. C. (2019). Geotechnical data standardization and management to support BIM for underground infrastructures and tunnels. In Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art, CRC Press, pp. 655-664.
  3. Bentley Systems. (2021), ContextCapture Connect Edition User Guide, Exton, Pennsylvania, USA.
  4. Chandler, R. J., McGregor, I. D., Morin, G. R. (2012). The role of geotechnical data in Building Information Modelling. In Proceedings of the 11th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics (ANZ 2012), 15, p. 18.
  5. De Laat, R., Van Berlo, L. (2011). Integration of BIM and GIS: The development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In Advances in 3D geo-information sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 211-225.
  6. Hwang, J. R., Kang, T. W., Hong, C. H. (2012). A study on the correlation analysis between IFC and CityGML for efficient utilization of construction data and GIS data. Spatial Information Research, 20(5), pp. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2012.20.5.049
  7. Kang, T. (2018). Development of a conceptual mapping standard to link building and geospatial information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(5), p. 162. (online published) (https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/7/5/162) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7050162
  8. Lee, J. H., Jin, H. S., An, J. S., Baek, Y. (2021). Numerical Analysis Study for Behavioral Characteristics Analysis of Jeju Natural Caves (Jaeamcheon Lava Tube) That Intersect with Roads. The Journal of Engineeing Geology, 31(3), pp. 367-380.
  9. MOLIT. (2021). BIM-based construction industry digital transformation roadmap. In, eds. Ministry Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, pp. 1-20.
  10. Noardo, F., Biljecki, F., Agugiaro, G., Arroyo Ohori, K., Ellul, C., Harrie, L., Stoter, J. (2019). GeoBIM benchmark 2019: Intermediate results. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences-ISPRS Archives. 42(4), pp. 47-52.
  11. Noardo, F., Ellul, C., Harrie, L., Overland, I., Shariat, M., Arroyo Ohori, K., Stoter, J. (2020). Opportunities and challenges for GeoBIM in Europe: developing a building permits use-case to raise awareness and examine technical interoperability challenges. Journal of Spatial Science, 65(2), pp. 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2019.1627253
  12. Obergriesser, M., Borrmann, A. (2012). Infrastructural BIM standards-Development of an Information Delivery Manual for the geotechnical infrastructural design and analysis process. eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, pp. 581-587.
  13. Rafiee, A., Dias, E., Fruijtier, S., Scholten, H. (2014). From BIM to geo-analysis: view coverage and shadow analysis by BIM/GIS integration. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 22, pp. 397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.11.037
  14. Seequent Limited. (2019), Leapfrog Works Fundamentals For Leapfrog Works version 3.0. User Manual, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  15. Svensson, M., Friberg, O. (2017). GeoBIM-a tool for optimal geotechnical design. In Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 4, pp. 1781-1784.
  16. Tawelian, L. R., Mickovski, S. B. (2016). The implementation of geotechnical data into the BIM process. Procedia Engineering, 143, pp. 734-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.115
  17. Zhang, J., Wu, C., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Wu, Y., Mao, X. (2018). The BIM-enabled geotechnical information management of a construction project. Computing, 100(1), pp. 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-017-0571-8
  18. Zobl, F., Chmelina, K., Faber, R., Kooijman, J., Marschallinger, R., Stoter, J. (2011). Multidimensional aspects of GeoBIM data: new standards needed. In Mathematical Geosciences at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the IAMG2011 conference. pp. 1-14.
  19. Zobl, F., Marschallinger, R. (2008). Subsurface geobuilding information modelling GeoBIM. GEOinformatics, 8(11), pp. 40-43.