Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Approach into Framework for Smart City Indexes - Based on the Possibility of Integration and Linkage of Domestic Public Institution Indexes -

스마트시티 인덱스 프레임워크 연구 - 국내 공공기관 개발 인덱스의 통합 및 연계 가능성을 바탕으로 -

  • 김주만 (성균관대 미래도시융합공학과 글로벌스마트시티 융합전공) ;
  • 이강은 (성균관대 건축학과 글로벌스마트시티 융합전공) ;
  • 서명원 (성균관대 건축학과 글로벌스마트시티 융합전공) ;
  • 신중호 (성균관대 미래도시융합공학과) ;
  • 김도년 (성균관대 건축학과.미래도시융합공학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.19
  • Accepted : 2021.11.02
  • Published : 2021.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many cities around the world are adopting smart city as a new urban model. In this context, smart city indexes are becoming more important for assessing and evaluating smart cities. A number of smart city indexes were developed in Korea in the past few years, by different entities for different purposes and with no relation to each other. From a user's perspective, this led to difficulty in understanding smart city indexes and also reduced the usefulness and effectiveness of various indexes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the smart city indexes currently being developed in Korea, and present a comprehensive framework that can integrate and link these smart city indexes. First, we define 'result-centric' and 'process-centric' evaluation structures for smart city indexes based on literature research. Second, the features and structures of smart city indexes under development were analyzed to develop a comprehensive framework for all smart city indexes, with focus on the indexes from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Third, the concept of smart city index framework is presented, in which various smart city indexes can be organized and utilized. This framework is expected to provide better understanding of different smart city indexes in Korea, and enable better usage and communication among different users of these indexes to address various economic, environmental, social, and other urban issues.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부.국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원(과제번호: 21DEAP-B158906-02)을 받아 수행된 연구입니다. 이 논문은 국토교통부의 스마트시티 혁신인재육성사업으로 지원되었습니다.

References

  1. Ban, Y., Baek, J., & Kim, Y. (2018). Developing an Urban Safety Assessment Framework Using Sustainable Urban Metabolism. Crisisonomy, 14(5), 119-135.
  2. Bosch, P., Jongeneel, S., Rovers, V., Neumann, H., Airaksinen, M., & Huovial, A. (2017). CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from http://www.citykeys-project.eu
  3. BSI. (2019). ISO 37106 International standards for sustainable cities and communities, summary guidelines for building smart city operating models for sustainable communities. BSI Group Korea. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from http://bsiblog.co.kr
  4. Choi, J., & Chun, E. (2019). A Study on Smart City Planning Method for Residents' Experience by Applying the Concept of Core Index. Journal of the Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, 66, 141-150.
  5. Choi, K. (2011). Development and application of Competitiveness Index in the context of Climate Change in Korean industry. Ph.D. Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  6. Committee on the Compilation of Terminology Related to Civil Engineering. (1997). A Dictionary of Civil Terms. Tamguwon.
  7. Doopedia. (1996). Framework. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from https://www.doopedia.co.kr
  8. Falconer, G., Mitchell, S. (2012). Smart City Framework A Systematic Process for Enabling Smart + Connected Communities. CISCO. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from http://www.cisco.com
  9. Ferrao, P., Fernandez, J. E., & Ferrao, P. (2013). Sustainable urban metabolism. MIT press. 23-42.
  10. Ilgen, D., Hollenbeck, J., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
  11. ISO/TC268. (2017). ISO/CD 37122, Sustainable development in communities - indicators for Smart Cities. ISO. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.iso.org
  12. ITU-T. (2014). Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from https://www.itu.int
  13. ITU, UNECE, UN-Habitat. (2017). Collection Methodology for Key Performance Indicators for Smart Sustainable Cities. Switzerland Geneva.
  14. Jo, S., Lee, S., Jo, S., & Leem, Y. (2021). An Analysis on the Smart City Assessment of Korean Major Cities : Using STIM Framework. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(3), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.03.157
  15. Jung, S., & Jun, K. (2020). A Study on the Development of Smart Water Grid Key Performance Index for the Implementation of Smart City. Journal of Korean Society of Disaster and Security, 13(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.21729/KSDS.2020.13.1.25
  16. Kim, C., & Kim, K. (2012). A Study on Visual Simulation from Independent Framework. Illustration Forum, 32, 79-88.
  17. Kim, H. (2013). Trend Knowledge Dictionary 1. Personality and thought history. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://smartcity.go.kr
  18. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (2019). Smart City Innovation and Growth Motives Project Brochure. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://terms.naver.com
  19. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement. (2017). 2017 World-leading Smart City R&D Project Modification Planning Report. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from https://www.kaia.re.kr
  20. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. (2018). Development of Framework for KICT Smart City Index. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 2018-145. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from http://www.codil.or.kr
  21. Korea Planning Association, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. (2019). Evaluation and Implementation of Urban Sustainability and Living Infrastructure Level in 2019. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.codil.or.kr
  22. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. (2016). A Study on Construction and Application Approaches of Smart City Maturity and Potential Diagnostic Models. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 16-15. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.krihs.re.kr
  23. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. (2021). Smart city certification criteria. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.smartcitycelc.krihs.re.kr/
  24. Lee, J. (2021). Development and utilization of smart city indexes. The Magazine of the IEEE, 48(3), 41-49.
  25. Lee, J., & Han, S. (2019). An Investigation of a Smart City Policy Change and Local Government Response. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 1-11.
  26. Lee, J., & Han, S. (2017). The Meanings and Future Agendas of the Act on Smart City Law Revision. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 20(3), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.21189/jkugs.20.3.7
  27. Lee, K., & Sohn, H. (2016). Geospatial Information System Terminology Dictionary. Gumiseogwan.
  28. Lee, M., & Leem, C. (2019). A Study on Performance Evaluation of the Korea Smart City Demonstration Service. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 44(10), 1992-2002. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2019.44.10.1992
  29. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2021). Act on the Promotion of Smart City Development and Industry. Act No. 17799. Retrieved August 5, 2021 from http://www.law.go.kr
  30. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2021). Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Promotion of Smart City Development and Industry. Presidential Decree No. 31779. Retrieved August 5, 2021 from http://www.law.go.kr
  31. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2021). Guidelines for the Operation of Smart City and Smart City Service Certification. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Notice No. 2021-233. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from http://www.law.go.kr
  32. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2019). 3rd Smart City Comprehensive Plan. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://smartcity.go.kr
  33. Navigant Research. (2019). Smart City Tracker 2Q19. Navigant Research. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.businesswire.com
  34. Roland Berger. (2019). Think:Act, The Smart City Breakaway. Roland Berger. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.rolandberger.com
  35. Seoul Digital Foundation. (2019). A Study on the Indicators for Improving the International Status of Smart City Seoul. Seoul Digital Foundation. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from www.sdf.seoul.kr
  36. Shin, W. (2020). A Study on the Development of Indicators for Smart City Index, Ph.D. Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  37. Shin, W., Kim, D., Cho, Y., & Park, S. (2015). Comparative Analysis Research on the Difference Between U-City and Smart City for the Establishment of International Competitiveness of U-City. Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea, 7(3), 5-16.
  38. Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C. Hoving, K., Ospina, C. D., Murray, J., Gunn, L., Ferrato, M., Schreck, M., Jacob, M., Dahl, N., & Godron, A. (2020). 2020 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. Retrieved October 4, 2021 from epi.yale.edu