Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vulnerability Curve Assessment of Low/Mid-Rise Buildings Subjected to Debris-Flow Hazards

저·중층 건축물에 대한 토석류 취약도 평가

  • 최승훈 (강원대학교 산업기술연구소) ;
  • 함희정 (강원대학교 건축.토목.환경공학부) ;
  • 이승수 (충북대학교 토목공학부)
  • Received : 2021.08.31
  • Accepted : 2021.11.08
  • Published : 2021.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, a methodology is developed to evaluate vulnerability (mean damage probability) curves of debris-flow for low/mid-rise buildings based on the fragility (exceedance damage probability) curves and mean damage ratio (MDR). In order to evaluate fragility curves, First Order Second Moment (FOSM) method is applied in this study. In the FOSM method, the maximum horizontal displacement of the building caused by the static and dynamic loadings of debris-flow is estimated as the effect of the external force, and the median/log-standard deviation values of spectral displacement of earthquake fragility of buildings developed by National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) are used as the resistance statistics. MDR of the building subjected to the load of debris-flow is established based on literatures of the post investigations of debris-flow and landslide disasters, and is applied to convert the fragility curve to vunerability curve. 32 different types of vulnerability curves for buildings are databased as the variables of log-normal cumulative distribution function (CDF) after calibration and correction with the available post-disaster data sets. The vulnerability curves developed in this study may be used for risk and loss assessment of buildings subjected to debris-flow hazards. The developed methodology can be also applied if information of the fragility is available and the vulnerability has to be estimated from the fragility.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 행정안전부 극한 재난대응 기반기술개발사업의 연구비 지원(2018-MOIS31-009)에 의해 수행되었음. 또한, 이 논문는 2021년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(NRF-2021R1A6A3A01086618).

References

  1. AIK (Architectural Institute of Korea) (2016). 2016 Korean Building Code and Commentary, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport.
  2. Akbas, S.O., & Sterlacchini, S. (2009). Fragility Curve Construction for Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Affected by Debris Flow, European Geosciences Union General Assembly.
  3. Aversa, S., Cascini, L., Picarelli, L., & Scavia, C. (2016). Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice, CRC Press.
  4. Baker, J.W. (2015). Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting using Dynamic Structural Analysis, Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M
  5. Baoliang, W.I., Yong, L.I., Daochuan L.I., & Jingjing, L. (2018). Debris flow density determined by grain composition, Landslides, 15(6), 1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0912-x
  6. Bathurst, R.J., Huang, B., Allen, T.M., & Nowak, A. (2008). Calibration concepts for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of reinforced soil walls, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44, 1378-1392. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-061
  7. Borja, R.I. (2011). Multiscale and Multiphysics Processes in Geomechanics, Springer.
  8. Corominas, J., Van Westen, C., Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J.-P., Fotopoulou, S., Catani, F., Van Den, M., Eeckhaut, Mavrouli, O., Agliardi, F., Pitilakis, K., Winter, M.G., Pastor, M., Ferlisi, S., Tofani, V., Hervas, J., & Smith, J.T. (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk, Bull Eng Geol Environ, 73, 209-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
  9. Choi, S.H. (2021). Development of Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies of Building for Debris-Flow Risk Analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Kangwon National University.
  10. Choi, W.I. (2013). A Study on Development of Vulnerability Functions Based on Characteristics of Debris Flow and Structure in Korea, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Seoul.
  11. Chopra, A. (2007). Dynamic of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 3rd Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  12. De Rocquigny, E. (2012). Modelling Under Risk and Uncertainty, Wiley.
  13. FEMA (2010). Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Technical Manual.
  14. Haugen, E.D., & Kaynia, A.M. (2008). Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow, 10th International Symposium on Landslides and Engineered Slopes.
  15. Hungr, O., Morgan, G., & Kellerhalls, R. (1984). Quantitative Analysis of debris Torrent Hazard for Design of Remedial Measures, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21(4), 663-667. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-073
  16. Kang, H.S. (2016). Physical Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings Considering Rheological Properties of Debris Flow and Rainfall Return Period, Ph.D. dissertation, Pukyong National University.
  17. Kim, K.S., Kim, S.W., Jang, S.J., Lee, K.Y., Seo, G.B., & Kim, B.S. (2015). Development of Criteria for Zoning of Debris Flow Hazard Area(II), Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 15(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.197
  18. Kottegoda, N.T., & Rosso, R. (1997). Statistics, Probability, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  19. MOIS (Ministry of the Interior and Safety) (2020). Statistical yearbook of natural disaster.
  20. MOIS (2021). Report on the situation to heavy rain, July 5-7.
  21. NEMA (National Emergency Management) (2009). Development of Seismic Fragility Functions for Building Structure in Korea.
  22. Porter, K. (2015). A Beginner's Guide to Fragility, Vulnerability, and Risk, http://www.sparisk.com/pubs/Porter-beginners-guide.pdf.
  23. Pregnolato, M., Galasso, C., & Parisi, F. (2015). A Compendium of Existing Vulnerability and Fragility Relationships for Flood: Preliminary Results, 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering.
  24. RiskScape (2021). RiskScape - a world-leading risk modelling tool for New Zealand, https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Our-Science/Natural-Hazards-and-Risks/Our-stories/RiskScape-a-world-leading-risk-modelling-tool-for-New-Zealand.
  25. Schultz, M.T., Gouldby, B.P., Simm, J.D., & Wibowo, J.L. (2010). Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability, US Army Corps of Engineers.
  26. SafeLand (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk.
  27. Shabana, A. (2019). Theory of Vibration, Springer.
  28. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2014). Additional Causes and Supplemental Investigation of the Mt. Umyeon Landslide.
  29. Tsao, T., Hsu, C., Yin, H., & Cheng, K. (2019). Debris-flow building damage level and vulnerability curve - A case study of a 2015 Typhoon event in northern Taiwan, 7th International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation.