Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Dymstec for their support and assistance during our system implementation. This work was supported by the ICT R&D program of MSIT/IITP. [2019-0-00102, A Study on Public Health and Safety in a Complex EMF Environment].
References
- A. Ghosh et al., 5G evolution: A view on 5G cellular technology beyond 3GPP release 15, IEEE Access 7 (2019), 127639-127651. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2939938
- M. E. Leinonen et al., 28 GHz wireless backhaul transceiver characterization and radio link budget, ETRI J. 40 (2018), no. 1, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2017-0231
- S. Henry, A. Alsohaily, and E. S. Sousa, 5G is real: evaluating the compliance of the 3GPP 5G new radio system with the ITU IMT-2020 requirements, IEEE Access 8 (2020), no. 10, 42828-42840. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977406
- A. Aldalbahi, Multi-backup beams for instantaneous link recovery in mmWave communications, Electronics 8 (2019), no. 10, 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8101145
- T. Lv et al., Millimeter-wave NOMA transmission in cellular M2M communications for internet of things, IEEE Internet Things J. 5 (2018), no. 3, 1989-2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2018.2819645
- R. Ford et al., Achieving ultra-low latency in 5G millimeter wave cellular networks, IEEE Commun. Mag. 55 (2017), no. 3, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600407CM
- NR - Base station (BS) radio transmission and reception, document TS 38.104, 3GPP, (2019), v. 15.8.0.
- Y. S. Lee et al., A study on the convenient EMF compliance assessment for base station installations at a millimeter wave frequency, J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 18 (2018), no. 4, 242-247. https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2018.18.4.242
- A. Perrin, and M. Souques, Electromagnetic Fields, Environment and Health, Springer-Verlag, France, 2012.
- T. Wu, T. S. Rappaport, and C. M. Collins, Safe for generations to come, IEEE Microw. Mag. 16 (2015), no. 2, 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2014.2377587
- M. Simko and M. Mattsson, 5G wireless communication and health effects - a pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (2019), no. 18, 3406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183406
- M. Zhadobov et al., Evaluation of the potential biological effects of the 60-GHz millimeter waves upon human cells, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57 (2009), no. 10, 2949-2956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2009.2029308
- S. Koyama et al., Long-term exposure to a 40-GHz electromagnetic field does not affect genotoxicity or heat shock protein expression in HCE-T or SRA01/04 cells, J. Radiat. Res. 60 (2019), no. 4, 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz017
- M. Zhadobov et al., Near-field dosimetry for in vitro exposure of human cells at 60 GHz, Bioelectromagnetics 33 (2012), no. 1, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20685
- J. X. Zhao, Numerical dosimetry for cells under millimetre-wave irradiation using Petri dish exposure set-ups, Phys. Med. Biol. 50 (2005), no. 14, 3405-3421. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/015
- J. Zhao and Z. Wei, Numerical modeling and dosimetry of the 35 mm Petri dish under 46 GHz millimeter wave exposure, Bioelectromagnetics 26 (2005), no. 6, 481-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20121
- T. S. Rappaport et al., Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: it will work!, IEEE Access 1 (2013), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2260813
- Y. S. Lee et al., Proposal of 28 GHz in vitro exposure system based on field uniformity for three-dimensional cell culture experiments, Bioelectromagnetics 40 (2019), no. 7, 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22215
- K. Jung et al., KeraSkinTM-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests, Toxicol. in Vitro. 28 (2014), no. 5, 742-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.02.014
- W. Jang et al., Evaluation of eye irritation potential of solid substance with new 3D reconstructed human cornea model, MCTT HCETM, Biomol. Ther. 23 (2015), no. 4, 379-385. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2015.004
- ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys. 74 (1998), no. 4, 494-522.
- ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys. 118 (2020), no. 5, 483-524. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210
- J. Schuderer et al., In vitro exposure apparatus for ELF magnetic fields, Bioelectromagnetics 25 (2004), no. 8, 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20037
- N. Nikoloski et al., Reevaluation and improved design of the TEM cell in vitro exposure unit for replication studies, Bioelectromagnetics 26 (2005), no. 3, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20067
- P. L. Pogam et al., Untargeted metabolomics unveil alterations of biomembranes permeability in human HaCaT keratinocytes upon 60GHz millimeter-wave exposure, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019), no. 1, 1-10.
- F. Schönborn et al., Basis for optimization of in vitro exposure apparatus for health hazard evaluations of mobile communications, Bioelectromagnetics 22 (2001), no. 8, 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.83
- C. Newell, R. D. Ward, and E. J. Mcfarlane, Gain and power parameter measurements using planar near-field techniques, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 36 (1988), no. 6, 792-803. https://doi.org/10.1109/8.1181
- A. Balanis, Antenna theory: analysis and design, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2005.
Cited by
- Effects of Electromagnetic Waves with LTE and 5G Bandwidth on the Skin Pigmentation In Vitro vol.22, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010170