DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The EU's Public Diplomacy in Asia and the World through Social Media: Sentiment and Semantic Network Analyses of Official Facebook Pages of European External Action Service and EU Delegation to the Republic of Korea

  • Yoon, Sung-Won (Division of Business Administration, The University of Suwon) ;
  • Chung, Sae Won (Division of International and Area Studies, Pukyong National University)
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

This study aims to assess the quality of the EU's public diplomacy efforts through social media. Specifically, this research explores the headquarters of European public diplomacy (European External Action Service, EEAS) and its subordinate agent (EU Delegation to South Korea, EUDK). The main research question is "how coherently and effectively does the EU execute public diplomacy strategies in the third countries?'' This study employs both quantitative and qualitative approaches―the former for the results presentation and the latter for the results interpretation. The results are summarized in two points. First, both the EEAS and the EUDK maintained an objective position by posting only neutral perspectives on their social media. Second, the narratives of the main actors were the same, but the main themes were different according to their contexts. The analysis discusses the effectiveness of the EU's strategic narratives by focusing on measuring message reception. Its limited findings were that social media postings could not induce the audiences' active discussion of the EU's diplomatic performances. The conclusion suggests that the EU should identify the expectations from its global counterparts and use these to forge the Union's strategic narratives.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A03037349).

References

  1. Bridges, B. (2008). The European Union and the Korean Conundrum. In Balme, R. & Bridges, B. (Eds.), Europe-Asia relations: Building multilateralisms (pp. 213-232). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  2. Chung, S. W., & Lee, J. (2019). Building the pillars of the EU-South Korea strategic partnership. Asia Europe Journal, 17, 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00557-z
  3. Collins, N., & Bekenova, K. (2019). Digital diplomacy: success at your fingertips. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-017-0087-1
  4. CPD Blog. Public diplomacy before Gullion: the evolution of a phrase, by Cull, N. Available online: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase (accessed 15 May 2020).
  5. Critchlow, J. (2004). Public diplomacy during the Cold War: the record and its implications. Journal of Cold War Studies, 6, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1162/152039704772741597
  6. Cross, M., & Melissen, J. (Eds.) (2013). European public diplomacy: soft power at work. New York, the US: Palgrave MacMillan.
  7. Cross, M., & La Porte, M. (2017). The European Union and image resilience during times of crisis: the role of public diplomacy, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 12, 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341365
  8. Cull, N. (2009). "Public diplomacy: lessons from the past," CPD Perspectives on Public diplomacy, Available online: http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/legacy/publications/perspectives/CPDPerspectivesLessons.pdf (accessed 11 May 2020)
  9. David, C., Legara, E. F. T., Atun, J. M. L., & Monterola, C. P. (2014). News frames of the population issue in the Philippines. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1247-1267.
  10. Digital Diplomacy, "Interview: David Tunney, Head of social media for the EEAS: 'Traditional diplomacy is being transformed by social media and online communication'," April 29 2014, Available online: http://digitaldiplomacy.ro/interview-david-tunney-head-social-media-eeas-traditional-diplomacy-transformed-social-media-online-communication/?lang=en (accessed 14 May 2020)
  11. Dodd, M. D., & Collins, S. J. (2017). Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts, Public Relations Review, 43, 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004
  12. Dumciuviene, A. (2016). Twiplomacy: the meaning of social media to public diplomacy and foreign policy of Lithuania, Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 35, 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0025
  13. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  14. European External Action Service (EEAS), "Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe," June 2016, Available online: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf (accessed 11 May 2020).
  15. European External Action Services, Available online: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquartershomepage_en/9005/The%20EEAS%20and%20Social%20Media (accessed 14 May 2020).
  16. EEAS, EU Delegation to the Republic of Korea, Invitation to Eurovillage on 3-4 June 2017, Available online: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/south-korea/26001/node/26001_nn (accessed 17 May 2020).
  17. Freedman, L. (2006). Networks, culture and narratives. Adelphi Papers, 45, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/05679320600661640
  18. Jiang, K., Anderton, B. N., Ronald, P. C., & Barnett, G. A. (2018). Semantic Network Analysis Reveals Opposing Online Representations of the Search Term "GMO". Global Challenges, 2. 1-8.
  19. Kim, L., & Kim, N. (2015). Connecting opinion, belief and value: Semantic Network Analysis of a UK public survey on embryonic stem cell research. Journal of Scientific Communication, 14, 1-23.
  20. Kunal, S., Saha, A., Varma, A., & Tiwari, V. (2018). Textual dissection of live twitter reviews using naive bayes. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.182
  21. Li, X., & Wang, J. (2010). Web-based public diplomacy: The role of social media in the Iranian and Xinjiang riots. Journal of International Communication, 16, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2010.9674756
  22. London School of Economics and Political Science. (2016). Review roundtable: Naked diplomacy: Power and statecraft in the digital age by Tom Fletcher. Available online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/07/18/review-roundtable-naked-diplomacy-power-and-statecraft-in-the-digital-age-by-tom-fletcher/ (accessed 14 May 2020).
  23. Lynch, D. (2005). "Communicating Europe to the World: What Public Diplomacy for the EU?" EPC Working Paper No.21 Available online: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/DigitalLibrary/Publications/Detail/?ots591=0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233&lng=en&id=16968 (accessed 11 May 2020)
  24. Manor, I., & Segev, C. (2015). "America's selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts," In Bjola, C. & Holmes, M. (Eds.), Digital diplomacy: theory and practice (pp. 89-108). New York: Routledge.
  25. Metzgar, E. T. (2012). Is it the medium or the message? Social media, American public diplomacy & Iran. Global Media Journal, 1, 1-16.
  26. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order. London: Routledge.
  27. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2017). Forging the World: Strategic narratives and international relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  28. Motta, G., & Baden, C. (2013). Evolutionary factor analysis of the dynamics of frames: Introducing a method for analyzing high-dimensional semantic data with time-changing structure. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 48-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.760730
  29. NodeXL Korea (2015). Catching Up NodeXL (in Korean). Seoul: Paradigm Book.
  30. Pacheco Pardo, R., Linde, D., & Maximillan, E. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Institute for European Studies, EU-Republic of Korea Relations Putting the Strategic Partnership to Work, May 2018, by Available Online: https://www.ies.be/node/4791 (accessed 20 July 2020).
  31. Renken, W. (2014). Social media use in public diplomacy: A case study of the German missions' Facebook use, MSc Thesis, University of Stirling, UK, and Lund Universiteit, Sweden, Available online: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=4770251&fileOId=4770252 (accessed 14 May 2020).
  32. Schultz, F., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., Utz, S., & van Atteveldt, W. (2012). Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associated frames. Public Relation Review, 38, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.003
  33. Seib, P. (2012). Real-time diplomacy: politics and power in the social media era. London: Springer.
  34. Sevin, E., & Ingenhoff, D. (2018). Public diplomacy on social media: Analyzing networks and content. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3663-3685.
  35. Snow, N. (2013). Truth is the best propaganda: Edward R. Murrow's speeches in the Kennedy years. McLean: Miniver Press.
  36. Statcounter, Social Media Stats Worldwide June 2019-June 2020, Available online: https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats (accessed 20 July 2020).
  37. US Department of State Archive, Announcement of Nomination of Karen P. Hughes as Under Secretary State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs and Dina Powell as Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Secretary Condoleezza Rice, Benjamin Franklin Room Washington, D.C., March 14, 2005. Available online: https://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2005/43385.htm (accessed 15 May 2020).
  38. Uysal, N., & Schroeder, J. (2019). Turkey's Twitter public diplomacy: towards a "new" cult of personality. Public Relations Review, 45, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.012
  39. van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, K., & Schlobach, S. (2008). Good news or bad news? Conducting sentiment analysis on Dutch text to distinguish between positive and negative relations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5, 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680802154145
  40. Visitseoul.net, All about Seoullo 7017!, May 16, 2017, Available online: http://english.visitseoul.net/tours/All-about-Seoullo-7017_/21502 (accessed 17 May 2020).
  41. Walker, M. (2000). Europe: Superstate or Superpower? World Policy Journal, 17, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-2001-1006
  42. Yarchi, M., Samuel-Azran, T., & Bar-David. L. (2017). Facebook users' engagement with Israel's public diplomacy messages during the 2012 and 2014 military operations in Gaza. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 13, 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-017-0058-6
  43. Zaharna, R. S., & Rugh, W. A. (2012). Issue theme: the use of social media in US public diplomacy, Global Media Journal,11, 1-8.