대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제15권4호
  • /
  • Pages.145-153
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

코어강화를 동반한 시각적 되먹임 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 협응력, 균형과 보행능력에 미치는 영향

Effect of Visual Feedback Training of Core Strength on Coordination, Balance and Walking Ability of Stroke Patients

  • 윤삼원 (부산가톨릭대학교 대학원 물리치료전공) ;
  • 손호희 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Yoon, Sam-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.27
  • 심사 : 2020.11.06
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE: This study compares the effects of HUBER rehabilitation and general rehabilitation treatment on the coordination, balance, and walking ability of stroke patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 38 randomized stroke patients, and data was collected for 6 weeks. All participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 19) or control group (n = 19). The experimental group were administered Huber rehabilitation and general rehabilitation treatment. The control group was given only general rehabilitation treatment. Both treatments were conducted for 30 minutes during each training session, 3 training sessions per week, for 6 weeks. The coordination, balance, and walking ability were evaluated before and after the intervention, to compare the intergroup and intragroup changes. RESULTS: Change in the right LOS (limit of stability) (p < .001) and forward LOS (p < .02) following intervention were significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group, but no significant group difference was observed between left LOS (p > .1) and backward LOS (p > .2). Alterations in coordination (p < .02) and TUG (p <. 05) were significantly greater after intervention in the experimental group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that HUBER rehabilitation is effective in improving the coordination, balance, and walking ability in stroke patients. To strengthen and validate the results of this study, future studies related to HUBER rehabilitation are required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2008.
  2. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM, et al. Maximum voluntary weight-bearing by the affected and unaffected legs in standing following stroke. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11(6):333-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(96)00014-9
  3. Belgen B, Beninato M, Sullivan PE, et al. The association of balance capacity and falls self-efficacy with history of falling in community-dwelling people with chronic stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2006;87(4):554-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.12.027
  4. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait & posture. 2002;16(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4
  5. Pang MY, Eng JJ, McKay HA, et al. Reduced hip bone mineral density is related to physical fitness and leg lean mass in ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke. Osteoporosis international. 2005;16(12):1769-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1925-1
  6. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2000; 81(4):409-17. https://doi.org/10.1053/mr.2000.3839
  7. Mauritz KH. Gait training in hemiplegia. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(1):23-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1023.x
  8. Kizony R, Levin MF, Hughey L, et al. Cognitive load and dual-task performance during locomotion poststroke: A feasibility study using a functional virtual environment. Phys Ther. 2010;90(2):252-60. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090061
  9. Cederfeldt M, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Savborg M, et al. Influence of cognition on personal activities of daily living (P-ADL) in the acute phase: The Gothenburg Cognitive Stroke Study in Elderly. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2009;49(1):118-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.05.009
  10. Brouwer B, Culham EG, Liston RA, et al. Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1998;30(3):131. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655098444048
  11. Bonan IV, Yelnik AP, Collel FM, et al. Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: Effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program with visual cue deprivation after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):274-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.016
  12. Krukowska J, Bugajski M, Sienkiewicz M, et al. The influence of NDT-Bobath and PNF methods on the field support and total path length measure foot pressure (COP) in patients after stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2016;50(6):449-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2016.08.004
  13. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR, et al. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1139-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600960909
  14. Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, et al. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38:349-54. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000254607.48765.cb
  15. Walker C, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG. Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Physical therapy. 2000;80(9):886-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.886
  16. Lee SW, Lee KJ, Song CH. Effects of Visual Feedback-Based Balance Training on Balance in Elderly Fallers. J Muscle Joint Health. 2011;18(1):16-27. https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2011.18.1.016
  17. Karnath HO, Broetz D. Understanding and treating "pusher syndrome". Physical therapy. 2003;83(12):1119-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/83.12.1119
  18. Galley PM, Forster AL. Human movement, 2nd ed. New York. Churchill Livingstone. 1985.
  19. Markovic G, Sarabon N, Greblo Z, et al. Effects of feedback-based balance and core resistance training vs. Pilates training on balance and muscle function in older women: a randomized-controlled trial. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2015;61(2):117-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.05.009
  20. Woodford HJ, Price CI. EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;2:CD004585.
  21. Bellomo, RG, Iodice P, Savoia V, et al. Balance and posture in the elderly: an analysis of a sensorimotor rehabilitation protocol. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2009;22(3_suppl):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/03946320090220S308
  22. Guiraud T, Labrunee M, Besnier F, et al. Whole-body strength training with HUBER Motion Lab and traditional strength training in cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;60(1):20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.07.385
  23. Benito Garcia M, Atin Arratibel MA, Terradillos Azpiroz ME. The Bobath Concept in walking activity in chronic Stroke measured through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015;20(4):242-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1614
  24. Kilinc M, Avcu F, Onursal O, et al. The effects of Bobath-based trunk exercises on trunk control, functional capacity, balance, and gait: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2016;23(1):50-8. https://doi.org/10.1179/1945511915y.0000000011
  25. Letafatkar A, Nazarzadeh M, Hadadnezhad M, et al. The efficacy of a HUBER exercise system mediated sensorimotor training protocol on proprioceptive system, lumbar movement control and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2017;30(4):767-78. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-150404
  26. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005;86(8):1641-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011
  27. Couillandre A, Ribeiro MJD, Thoumie P, et al. Changes in balance and strength parameters induced by training on a motorised rotating platform: A study on healthy subjects. In Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique. 2008;51(2):67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.11.001
  28. Speziale F. Physician Aesthetic approach of kinesitherapy in overweight and body imperfections. New synergies and first results. 13o Congresso Internazionale della Societa Italiana di Medicina Estetica. 13-15. Italia. 2011.
  29. Harvey N, Ada L. Suitability of Nintendo Wii Balance Board for rehabilitation of standing after stroke. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2015;17(5):311-21. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743288X12Y.0000000032
  30. Fabre JB, Martin V, Borelli G, et al. Effects of a whole-body strength training program on metabolic responses and body composition. Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio Per Le Scienze Mediche. 2014;173:47-56.
  31. Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. Journal of Athletic Training. 2002;37(1):71.
  32. Ilg W, Timmann D. Gait ataxia-specific cerebellar influences and their rehabilitation. Movement Disorders. 2013;28:1566-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25558
  33. Vieira TM, Baudry S, Botter A. Young, healthy subjects can reduce the activity of calf muscles when provided with EMG biofeedback in upright stance. Frontiers in Physiology. 2016;29(7):158.