Journal of Chest Surgery

  • 제53권6호
  • /
  • Pages.339-345
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2765-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-1614(eISSN)
대한심장혈관흉부외과학회 (The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair with a Composite Graft for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Accompanied by Iliac Artery Aneurysm

  • Sohn, Bongyeon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hak Ju (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Hyoung Woo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jae Hang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dong Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Cheong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Kay Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.08
  • 심사 : 2020.07.01
  • 발행 : 2020.12.05
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Iliac artery aneurysm is frequently found in patients undergoing surgical repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The use of commercial bifurcated grafts is insufficient for aorto-biiliac replacement with complete iliac artery aneurysm resection. We evaluated the effectiveness of handmade composite grafts for this purpose. Methods: A total of 233 patients underwent open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2003 and 2019, including 155 patients (67%) treated with commercial grafts and 78 patients (33%) treated with handmade composite grafts. Their operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and late outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The early mortality rate did not differ significantly between the groups. On average, the handmade composite graft technique took approximately 15 minutes longer than the commercial graft technique (p=0.037). Among patients who underwent elective surgery, no significant differences between the conventional and composite groups were observed in the major outcomes, including red blood cell transfusion volume (2.8±4.7 units vs. 3.1±4.7 units, respectively; p=0.680), reoperation for bleeding (2.7% vs. 3.1%, respectively; p>0.999), bowel ischemia (0% vs. 1.6%, respectively; p=0.364), and intensive care unit stay duration (1.9±6.6 days vs. 1.6±2.4 days, respectively; p=0.680). The incidence of target vessel occlusion also did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: The increased technical demand involved with handmade composite grafting did not negatively impact the outcomes. This technique may be a viable option because it overcomes problems associated with commercial grafts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2126-35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1715955
  2. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM; EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:2366-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7
  3. Van Schaik TG, Yeung KK, Verhagen HJ, et al. Long-term survival and secondary procedures after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:1379-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.122
  4. Armon MP, Wenham PW, Whitaker SC, Gregson RH, Hopkinson BR. Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;15:255-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80186-X
  5. Santilli SM, Wernsing SE, Lee ES. Expansion rates and outcomes for iliac artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2000;31(1 Pt 1):114-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(00)70073-5
  6. Richards T, Dharmadasa A, Davies R, Murphy M, Perera R, Walton J. Natural history of the common iliac artery in the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:881-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.025
  7. Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:452-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1991.26737
  8. Hiromatsu S, Hosokawa Y, Egawa N, Yokokura H, Akaiwa K, Aoyagi S. Strategy for isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007;15:280-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/021849230701500403
  9. Chaer RA, Barbato JE, Lin SC, Zenati M, Kent KC, McKinsey JF. Isolated iliac artery aneurysms: a contemporary comparison of endovascular and open repair. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:708-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.008
  10. Bosanquet DC, Wilcox C, Whitehurst L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of internal iliac artery exclusion for patients undergoing EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:534-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.009
  11. Kouvelos GN, Katsargyris A, Antoniou GA, Oikonomou K, Verhoeven EL. Outcome after interruption or preservation of internal iliac artery flow during endovascular repair of abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016;52:621-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.07.081
  12. Ploeg AJ, Lardenoye JW, Peeters MP, Hamming JF, Breslau PJ. Wound complications at the groin after peripheral arterial surgery sparing the lymphatic tissue: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 2009;197:747-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.04.014
  13. Dube B, Unlu C, de Vries JP. Fate of enlarged iliac arteries after endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2016;23:803-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816661832
  14. Brown PM, Zelt DT, Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:280-4. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.119
  15. Lee JH, Choi JH, Kim EJ. The influence of unfavorable aortoiliac anatomy on short-term outcomes after endovascular aortic repair. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;51:180-6. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.3.180