Journal of Environmental Science International (한국환경과학회지)

The Korean Environmental Sciences Society (한국환경과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on Overseas Policy for Effective Conservation of Natural Resources

자연자원의 효율적인 보전을 위한 해외정책 사례 연구

  • Yoon, Ho-Jung (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yeom, Sung-Jin (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University)
  • 윤호정 (국립한경대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 염성진 (국립한경대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.29
  • Accepted : 2020.10.18
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Repeated use of land is depleting future resources and causing many ecological problems, prompting the need for a natural resource policy focusing on effective conservation. This study aims to identify methods based on international cases useful for introducing sustainable conservation of domestic natural resources. Currently, South Korea has developed and enforced many management and evaluation strategies for natural resources. However, due to limitations on policies and management, they show signs of strain. Therefore, this study compares and analyzes international conservation policies for nature and scenery, such as Germany's impact mitigation regulation, the USA's HEA (habitat equivalency analysis) and REA (resource equivalency analysis) policies, and Japan's three laws for landscape and greenery, to achieve the following three goals: first, find natural resources suitable for South Korea and define them. Second, plan goals for mitigation of total natural resources and build a basis for them. Third, establish effective complete plans for evaluating the total amount of natural resources.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, M., Domanski, A., Hollweg, T., Murray, J., Lane, D., Skrabis, K., Taylor, R., Moore, T., Dipinto, L., 2020, Restoration scaling approaches to addressing ecological injury: the habitat-based resource equivalency method, Environmental Management, USA.
  2. Breuer, W., 2015, Policy of intervention in environmental planning, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. Bruns, E., 2007, Evaluation and evaluation method -state and federal procedures analysis and systematization-, Ph. D. Dissertation, Berlin Institute of Technology, Germany.
  4. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, 2020, https://www.bfn.de/themen/planung/eingriffe.html.
  5. Cambridge Conservation Initiative, 2015, Strengthening implementation of the mitigation hierarchy: managing biodiversity risk for conservation gains, USA.
  6. Chapman, J. D., 2004, Habitat equivalency analysis: overview and case example, Stratus Consulting, USA.
  7. Choi, H. S., 2018, A Study on the establishment of the natural environment restoration act (tentative name), Korea Institute for Environmental Policy and Evaluation, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  8. Choi, I. T., 2008, A Study on impact regulation method for the ecological mitigation in urban development project - focused on Seochang second district in Incheon Metropolitan City, Korea, Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
  9. Choi, J. Y., Lee, D. K., Kim, E. Y., Choi, I. T., 2008, Feasibility study on the introduction of no net loss of green, Journal of Korean Environmental Restoration & Revegetation Technology, 11(2), 104-113.
  10. Choi, Y. K., 2006, Spatial development and environmental degradation: countermeasures focusing on planning process and institutionalization, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Korea.
  11. Choi, Y. K., Choi, I. T., 2012, Germany's natural infringement adjustment and implications for sustainable land management, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Korea.
  12. Choi, Y. K., Park, J. S., Choi, I. T., 2012, Impact mitigation regulation of germany and its policy implications to Korea, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Korea.
  13. Chungnam Development Institute, 2015, Methodology of ecological impact assessment on the habitat, Hanul Publishing Group, Korea.
  14. Cole, S., 2010, Environmental compensation using Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) and Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA): is it just for the birds?, Licentiate Thesis, Swedish University, USA.
  15. Corley, K. O., Al-Bahish, A., 2013, Understanding natural resource damages, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, USA.
  16. Darbi, M., Tausch, C., 2010, Loss-gain calculations in German impact mitigation regulation, Forest Trends, USA.
  17. Damage assessment, remediation, and restoration program, 2020, https://darrp.noaa.gov/economics/habitat-equivalency-analysis.
  18. Desvousges, H. W., Gard, N., Michael, J. H., Chance, D. A., 2018, Habitat and resource equivalency analysis: a critical assessment, Ecological Economics, 143, 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.003
  19. Dimitrakopoulos, G. P., Troumbis, Y. A., 2019, Biotopes, Encyclopedia of ecology, 1, 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10923-6
  20. Dunfordd, R. W., Ginn, G. C., Desvousges, H. W., 2004, The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments, Ecological Economics, 48, 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.07.011
  21. European Commission, 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/nnl/index_en.htm.
  22. Hampton, S., Zafonte, M., 2002, Calculating compensatory restoration in natural resource damage assessments: recent experience in California, California and the World Ocean, 2, 833-844.
  23. Hanson, A. D., Britney, M. E., Earle, J. C., Stweart, G. T., 2013, Adapting Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) to assess environmental loss and compensatory restoration following severe forest fires, Forest Ecology and Management, 294, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.032
  24. Heo, Y. A., 2014, Study on local government's landscape act -based landscape administrative system and enforcement process of landscape project, Master's Thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
  25. Hong, J. P., 2018, A Study on the implementation guidelines for urban ecological restoration projects, Korea Ecological Restoration Association, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
  26. Hyun, J. O., 2012, Guidelines for the fourth national survey of natural environment, Northeast Asia Plant Research Institute, Ministry of Environment National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea.
  27. Illinois Natural Resource Trustee Council, 2006, Assessment plan for the former indian refinery NPL Site, USA.
  28. Japan Valve Manufacturers' Association, 2004, https://j-valve.or.jp/environment/env-info/g040330-2.html.
  29. Kim, E. Y., Jeon, S. W., Song, W. K., Kwak, J. Y., Lee, J., 2012, Application of ECVAM as a indicator for monitoring national environment in Korea, Environ-mental Policy Research, 11(2), 3-16.
  30. Kim, J. O., Min, B. W., 2020, Problems and improvement strategies of environmental impact assessment by local government in South Korea -case studies of 8 local governments including Seoul, Jeju, Busan and Daejeon, Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment, 29(2), 132-143.
  31. Kling, C. L., Phaneuf, D. J., Zhao, J., 2012, From exxon to BP: has some number become better than no number?, 26 (4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.3
  32. Ko, J. H., Kil, J. H., Choi, N. H., Shin, Y. G., 2016, Landscape amenity and impact mitigation regulation of Germany, National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea.
  33. Ko, J. H., 2018, Raumordnung in Destschland, 3space text, Germany.
  34. Kwon, H. S., Lee, J. H., Choi, T. Y., Kim, I. K., Kim, S. H., Jun, B. S., Lee, J. E., Jeong, D. Y., Joo, W. Y., Seo, C. W., 2019, A Study on the evaluation and awareness of local ecological value, National Institute of Ecology, Korea.
  35. Landesanstalt fur Umwelt Baden-Wurttemberg, 2020, https://www.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/natur-und-landschaft/eingriffsregelung-oekokonto.
  36. Lee, H. W., Hong, H. J., 2017, Measures to improve the environmental of forest policy, Korea Institute for Environmental Policy Evaluation, Korea.
  37. Lee, H. W., Hong, H. J., 2017, Understanding and policy direction of total natural resources management, Korea Institute for Environmental Policy Evaluation, Korea.
  38. Lee, S. D., Kang, H. K., 2008, Ecological restoration plan for a small scale public construction area -a case study on llsan water treatment plant, Goyang-Si, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 35(6), 48-63.
  39. Lee, S. M., 2018, Characteristics of landscape management system in Japan and its implications in Korea, Architecture and Urban Space, Korea.
  40. Lee, Y. B., 2009, A Study on the improvement of the effectiveness of land appropriateness evaluation system, Korea Land and Housing Corporation, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea.
  41. Lee, Y. J., Park, J. H., Seong, C. Y., 2015, Current land development conditions and environmental manage -ment measures in the plan management zone, Korea Institute for Environmental Policy Evaluation, Korea.
  42. Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2013, A Study on the space planning and environmental ecological planning in Germany: based on interconnection, Korea.
  43. Ministry of Environment, 2015, The 3rd basic plan for conservation of natural environment, Korea.
  44. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Japan, 2005, Outline of Landscape Act, Japan.
  45. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Japan, 2019, Guidance for developing a landscape plan, Japan.
  46. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Japan, 2020, https://www.mlit.go.jp/crd/townscape/keikan/index.htm.
  47. Myung, S. J., Hwang, S. I., Kim, Y. J., 2017, A Study on the analysis of environmental policy trends in major countries, Korea Institute for Environmental Policy and Evaluation, Korea.
  48. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1995, Habitat equivalency analysis: an overview, department of commerce, USA.
  49. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2000, Habitat equivalency analysis: an overview, department of commerce, USA.
  50. National Park Service, 2003, Damage assessment and restoration handbook-guidance for damage assessment and restoration activities in the national park service, USA.
  51. Penn, T., 2001, A Summary of the natural resource damage assessment regulation under the united states oil pollution act, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA.
  52. Planning Consultants Association of Japan, 2004, View of 'three laws of landscape green', Japan.
  53. Quetier, F., Lavorel, S., 2011, Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions, Biological Conservation, 144, 2991-2999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.002
  54. Ray, G. L., 2008, Habitat equivalency analysis: a potential tool for estimating environmental benefits, Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program, USA.
  55. Ryan, J. T., 2011, Evolution of natural resource damage assessments under the oil pollution act and the comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability act, Fordham Environmental Law Review, 6, 29-49.
  56. Seo, J. K., 2015, Problems and improvement plans of the current environmental impact assessment system, Master's Thesis, Dongui University, Korea.
  57. Shaw, W. D., Wlodarz, M., 2013. Ecosystems, ecological restoration, and economics: does habitat or resource equivalency analysis mean other economic valuation methods are not needed?, 42, 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0351-9
  58. Snyder, J. P., Desvousges, W. H., 2013, Habitat and resource equivalency analyses in resource compensation and restoration decision-making, Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 28(1), 3-7.
  59. State Affairs Planning Advisory Committee, 2017, A Five-year plan for state administration, Korea.
  60. Tadashi, K., 2006, Landscape law -especially focusing on conservation and formation of landscapes in agricultural and forestry areas, Japan.
  61. Tanaka, A., 2004, Compensatory mitigation and habitat equivalency analysis for oil sill damages in the USA, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 2(2), 55-61.
  62. Tanaka, A., 2006, Introduction to HEP -Habitat evaulation procedure manual, Asakura Publishing co. Ltd, Japan.
  63. Taylor, D. T., Foulke, T., Reeve, A., 2012, A Case study in habitat equivalency analysis: the pacific connector gas pipeline, Western Economics Forum, USA.
  64. Thirdspace-environment glossary, 2014, Federal natural protection act 2009, Germany.
  65. Thirdspace-environment glossary, 2016, https://3spaceenvironment-glossary.com/?encyclopedia=german-nature-conservation-legislation.
  66. Yasko, K., Norihisa, Y., Tomohide, O., 2006, A Study on the development process of landscape planning based on landscape act, Lectures on Landscape and Design, 2, Japan.