DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Tasting of Distributors

  • LEE, Sung-Heun (Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • HWANG, Hee-Joong (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.18
  • 심사 : 2020.09.23
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30

초록

Purpose - Research on the mechanism by which tasting affects the purchase of related products and related products is still insufficient. Therefore, it is necessary to make good use of marketing practically how tasting affects taste and leads to consumption behavior. Research design, data, and methodology - First, we provide tasting sampling for people with different impulsive purchasing tendencies and check whether this leads to purchasing behavior in the future. Second, it is necessary to measure 'face (or notion of courtesy)', which is a characteristic of Koreans, as a moderating variable for the effect of sampling. Third, it is proposed to look at how the effect of sampling appears differently over time. Results - First, it is necessary to pay attention to the factors influencing the sampling effect in the product group that cannot produce a tasting situation such as general food or beverage. Second, research results may not apply to all actual marketing. Conclusions - This study is judged to have contributed to resolving the question of whether the distribution store's tasting promotion is more effective and lasts longer than other promotions. It also suggested the possibility that the effect of tasting could be changed depending on whether the amount of tasting was limited or the subjects of tasting.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Biswas, D., Grewal, D., & Roggeveen, A. (2010). How the order of sampled experiential products affects choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 508-519. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.3.508
  2. Brown, P., & Levison, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Languages, Cambridge University Press, p. 52.
  3. Cabanac, M. (1979). Sensory pleasure. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 54(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/410981
  4. Fedoroff, I. D., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1997). The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite, 28(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0057
  5. Gerlich, R. N., Browning, L., & Westermann, L. (2011). Consumer Utilization of an Advertising Stimulus: The Effect of Peel'n Taste Marketing System on Customer Attitudes, Product Feelings and Likelihood of Purchase. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 15(2), 103.
  6. Heilman, C., Lakishyk, K., & Radas, S. (2011). An empirical investigation of in-store sampling promotions. British Food Journal, 113(10), 1252-1266. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111177674
  7. Kirk-Smith, M.D. (1994). Cultural and Olfactory Communication. in Ethological Roots of Culture, R. Allen Gardner et al., eds., Boston: Kluwer, 385-406.
  8. Krishna, A. (2012). An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
  9. Lammers, H. B. (1991). The effect of free samples on immediate consumer purchase. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8(2), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769110034992
  10. Nowlis, S., & Shiv, B. (2005). The Influence of Consumer Distractions on the Effectiveness of Food-Sampling Programs. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.2.157.62287
  11. Peattie, S. (1998). Promotional competitions as a marketing tool in food retailing. British Food Journal, 100(6), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709810230472
  12. Rexha, D., Mizerski, K., & Mizerski, D. (2010). The effect of availability, point of purchase advertising, and sampling on children's first independent food purchases. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903575051
  13. Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (2002). Factors affecting encoding, retrieval, and alignment of sensory attributes in a memory-based brand choice task. Journal of Consumer Research 28(4), 603-617. https://doi.org/10.1086/338204
  14. Shiv, B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2004). The effect of distractions while tasting a food sample: The interplay of informational and affective components in subsequent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1086/425095
  15. Steinberg, S. A., & Yalch, R. F. (1978). When eating begets buying: The effects of food samples on obese and nonobese shoppers. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1086/208702
  16. Tal, A., & Wansink, B. (2015). An apple a day brings more apples your way: Healthy samples prime healthier choices. Psychology & Marketing, 32(5), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20801
  17. Troye, S. V., & Supphellen, M. (2012). Consumer Participation in Coproduction: "I Made It Myself" Effects on Consumers' Sensory Perceptions and Evaluations of Outcome and Input Product. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0205
  18. Vlachvei, A., Notta, O., & Ananiadis, I. (2009). Does advertising matter? An application to the Greek wine industry. British Food Journal, 111(7), 686-698. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910972378
  19. Wadhwa, M., Shiv, B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2008). A bite to whet the reward appetite: The influence of sampling on reward-seeking behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.4.403