DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Composition of Editorial Board Members of Domestic Journals Listed in WoS and SCOPUS: Focusing on the Field of Social Science

WoS와 SCOPUS에 등재된 국내 발행 학술지의 편집위원회 구성 분석 - 사회과학 분야를 중심으로 -

  • 이승민 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 오동근 (계명대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 여지숙 (계명대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.10.23
  • Accepted : 2020.11.18
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

The importance of the composition of the editorial board member is increasing as one of the measures to improve the quality of journals and to increase its international use. In this study, the composition of the Editorial Board Member (EBM) was analyzed for the journals listed in WoS and SCOPUS among domestic journals published in the field of social sciences to derive considerations to promote the internationalization of academic journals. As a result, for the internationalization of academic journals in the social science field, the composition of EBM that can promote the convergence of theory and practice, consideration of the regional aspect for the efficiency of EBM work, the composition of the EBM considering the efficiency of English-based academic communication, participation of researchers in EBM who can connect academics and the field should be considered.

학술지의 질적 수준을 제고하고 국제적 이용도를 높이기 위한 방안 가운데 하나로 편집위원회 구성의 중요성이 높아지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 사회과학 분야의 국내 발행 학술지 가운데 WoS와 SCOPUS에 등재된 학술지를 대상으로 편집위원회(Editorial Board Member: EBM)의 구성을 분석하여 학술지의 국제화를 도모하기 위한 고려사항을 도출하였다. 연구 결과, 사회과학 분야 학술지의 국제화를 위해서는 이론과 실무의 융합을 도모할 수 있는 EBM의 구성, EBM의 업무 효율화를 위한 지역적 측면의 고려, 영어 기반의 학술 커뮤니케이션 효율화를 고려한 EBM의 구성, 학계와 현장을 연계할 수 있는 연구진의 EBM 참여 등을 고려해야 하는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Kihong. 2012. "Various Indicators for Evaluating Journals, Their Characteristics and Problems." Science Editing, 1(1): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2012.1.9
  2. Kim, Sang-Jun. 2006. "An Effective Way to the International distribution of Korean Medical and Life Science Journals." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2): 457-480. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.2.457
  3. Park, Soo Youn et al. 2006. "Recent Trends of Citation Status and Suggestions for Improved the Academic Authority of the Journal of the Korean Radiological Society during 2000-2005: Analysis of All Citations using KoMCI." Journal of Korean Radiology Society, 55: 515-521. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2006.55.5.515
  4. Alzahrani Saad. 2010. The Role of Editorial Boards of Scholarly Journals on the Green and the Gold Road to Open Access. Ph.D Diss. Library, Archival and Information Studies, The Faculty of Graduate Studies, The University of British Columbia.
  5. Bates, Homer L. et al. 2011. "Accounting Editorial Board Membership and Research Output." Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(3): 39-46.
  6. Braun, T. and Diospatonyi, I. 2005. "Counting the Gatekeepers of International Science Journals a Worthwhile Science Indicator." Current Science, 89(9): 1548-1551.
  7. Brinn, T. and Jones, M. J. 2008. "The Composition of Editorial Boards in Accounting: A U.K. Perspective." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(1): 5-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304
  8. Bunner, C. and Larson, E. L. 2012. "Assessing the Quality of the Peer Review Process: Author and Editorial Board Member Perspectives." American Journal of Infection Control, 40(8): 701-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.012
  9. Burgess, T. F. and Shaw, N. E. 2010. "Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40." British Journal of Management, 21: 627-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00701.x
  10. Crase, D. 1992. "Editors, Editorial boards, and Reviewers: The Gatekeepers of Knowledge." Physical Educator, 49(1): 28-32.
  11. Dhanani, A. and Jones, M. J. 2017. "Editorial Boards of Accounting Journals: Gender Diversity and Internationalisation." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(5): 1008-1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1785
  12. Dow, R. F. 2000. "Editorial Gatekeepers Confronted by the Electronic Journal." College & Research Libraries, 61(2): 146-154. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.2.146
  13. Fogarty, T. J. and Liao, C-H. 2009. "Blessed are the Gatekeepers: A Longitudinal Study of the Editorial Boards of the Accounting Review." Issues in Accounting Education, 24(3): 299-318. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.299
  14. Fradkin, C. 2017. "The Internationalization of Psychology Journals in Brazil: A Bibliometric Examination Based on Four Indices." Paideia (Ribeirao Preto), 27(66): 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272766201702
  15. Garcia-Carpintero, E., Granadino B. and Plaza. L. M. 2010. "The Representation of Nationalities on the Editorial Boards of International Journals and the Promotion of the Scientific Output of the Same Countries." Scientometrics, 84(3): 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0199-3
  16. Gimenez-Toledo, E. et al. 2009. "The Editorial Boards of Spanish Scholarly Journals: What Are They Like? What Should They Be Like?" Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40(3): 287-306. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.40.3.287
  17. Grzybowski, A. and Kanclerz, P. 2019. "International Board Members of the American Journal of Ophthalmology." American Journal of Ophthalmology, 199: xiii-xvi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.11.011
  18. Harnad, S. 1996. Implementing Peer Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals. In R. Peek & G. Newby eds. Scholarly Publication: The Electronic Frontier. (pp. 103-108.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Harzing, Anne-Wil and Metz, Isabel. 2012. "Explaining Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards: The Role of Conference Participation and English Language Skills." European Journal of International Management, 6(6): 697-715.
  20. Lindsey, D. 1976. "Distinction, Achievement, and Editorial Board Membership." American Psychologist, 31: 799-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799
  21. Ma, Haitao et al. 2014. "The Effect of Geographical Proximity on Scientific Cooperation among Chinese Cities from 1990 to 2010." PLOS ONE, 9(11): e111705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111705
  22. Mabawonku, I. and Aina, L. O. 2005. "Characteristics of Library and Information Science Journals Published in West Africa." South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 71(3): 275-281.
  23. McGinty, S. 1998. Guardians at the Gate: Scholarly Journal Editors in a Time of Change. Ph.D Diss. Boston College, Boston, USA.
  24. Mulligan, A. 2005. "Is Peer Review in Crisis?" Oral Oncology, 41: 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.11.001
  25. Murray, D. et al. 2018. "Gender and International Diversity Improves Equity in Peer Review." BioRxiv, 400515.
  26. Nguyen, V. et al. 2018. "The Use of Solicited Publishing by Academic Surgeons." Surgery, 164(2): 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.027
  27. Nisonger, T. 2002. "The Relationship between International Editorial Board Composition and Citation Measures in Political Science, Business, and Genetics Journals." Scientometrics, 54(2): 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016065929026
  28. Oh, Dong-Geun et al. 2019a. "A Comparison of Editorial Board Members of Non-Western Journals and Core LIS Journals." In Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Library and Information Science, July 11-13, 2019, Taipei, Taiwan, 383-394.
  29. Oh, Dong-Geun et al. 2019b. "A Comparative Analysis of Editorial Leaders' Profiles of Major and Non-Western Library and Information Science Journals." Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7(4): 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2019.7.4.2
  30. Oh, Dong-Geun et al. 2018. "Analysis on the Characteristics of Editorial Board Members of Non-North-American and Non-European LIS Journals Listed in WoS and SCOPUS." In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Open Library to Open Society (iCoo 2018), Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand, 152-163.
  31. Pearson, C. H. et al. 2006. "Associate Editor's Role in Helping Authors and Upholding Journal Standards." Agronomy Journal, 98: 417-422. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0296
  32. Resh, V. H. 1998. "Science and Communication: An Author/Editor/User's Perspective on the Transition from Paper to Electronic Publishing." Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 19: 1-7.
  33. Rosing, C. K., Junges, R. and Haas, A. N. 2014. "Publication Rates of Editorial Board Members in Oral Health Journals." Brazilian Oral Research, 28(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0042
  34. Schlogl, C. and Petschnig, W. 2005. "Library and Information Science Journals: An Editor Survey." Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 29(1): 4-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2005.10766030
  35. Utrobicic, A. et al. 2014. "Composition of Editorial Boards and Peer Review Policies of Croatian Journals Indexed in Web of Science and SCOPUS." European Science Editing, 2: 31-33.
  36. Walters, W. H. 2016. "The Research Contributions of Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science." Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2): 121-146. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.2.121
  37. Walter, Achim, Mueller, Thilo A. and Helfert, Gabriele. 2000. "The Impact of Satisfaction, Trust, and Relationship Value on Commitment: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results." In Proceedings of the 16th IMP Conference, Bath, United Kingdom, 7-9.
  38. Willett, Peter. 2013. "The Characteristics of Journal Editorial Boards in Library and Information Science." International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 3(1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2013.3.1.005
  39. Zoccali, Carmine et al. 2015. "The Fate of Triaged and Rejected Manuscripts." Nephrol Dial Transplant, 30: 1947-1950. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfv387
  40. Zsindely, S., Schubert, A. and Braun, T. 1982. "Citation Patterns of Editorial Gatekeepers in International Chemistry Journals." Scientometrics, 4: 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098007