한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

임산공학 분야 연구데이터 관리를 위한 메타데이터 설계에 관한 연구

A Study on the Design of Metadata for Research Data Management in Forestry Engineering

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 한연중 (국립산림과학원 목재이용연구부) ;
  • 유원재 (국립산림과학원 목재이용연구부) ;
  • 김선태 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.20
  • 심사 : 2020.11.17
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 많은 학문 분야에서 해당 분야에서 생산되는 데이터를 관리하기 위한 메타데이터를 개발하고 있다. 범용적인 분야를 넘어서 특정 학문 분야를 지원하기 위한 메타데이터는 해당 분야의 연구데이터를 검색, 관리, 공유 및 재사용을 위한 필수한 것으로 여겨지고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 임산공학에서 생산되는 연구데이터를 관리하기 위한 메타데이터 항목을 도출하였다. 메타데이터 항목을 도출하기 위하여 FGDC-CSDGM, ISO 19115, NEFIS, INSPIRE, ANZLIC, DataCite 4.3 그리고 TTA,KO-10.0976 등 7개 메타데이터를 대상으로 매핑작업을 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 필수 6개, 권고 13개 그리고 선택 요소 9개가 도출되었다. 도출된 메타데이터는 임산공학 분야의 연구데이터를 체계적으로 관리하기 위한 항목으로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Recently, many academic fields are developing metadata to manage data produced in the field. Metadata to support a specific academic field beyond the general field is considered essential for searching, managing, sharing, and reusing research data in the field. Therefore, in this study, metadata items were derived to manage research data produced in forestry engineering. In order to derive metadata items, mapping work was performed on 7 metadata such as FGDC-CSDGM, ISO 19115, NEFIS, INSPIRE, ANZLIC, DataCite 4.3, and TTA.KO-10.0976. As a result of this study, 6 mandatory, 13 recommendations and 9 optional elements were derived. The derived metadata can be used as an item to systematically manage research data in the field of forestry engineering.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ko, Young-Man, Seo, Tae-Sul and Lim, Tae-Hoon. 2007. "A Study on Metadata Mapping for Semantic Interoperability." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 24(4): 223-238. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.4.223
  2. Kim, Kyoung-Min, Kim, Cheol-Min and Kim, Tae-Kyun. 2008. "Design and Implementation of Standard Metadata for Digital Forest Cover Type Map." Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 11(4): 51-63.
  3. Kim, Juseop, Kim, Suntae and Choi, Sangki. 2020. "A Study on Functional Details and Importance of Geoscience Research Data Management." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(1): 411-440. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.1.411
  4. Park, Ok-Nam. 2012. "A Study on Developing Preservation Metadata Based on PREMIS Focusing on Digital Data in National Library of Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2): 83-113. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.083
  5. Seo, Kang-Hyeon et al. 2017. "Standard Metadata Design for Linkage and Utilization of Damage Prediction Maps." Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 20(3): 52-66. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2017.20.3.052
  6. Sim, Gyu-Seong. 2016. "Metadata Design Based on Vector Type Geospatial Information Standard for the Collection and Management of Inundation Map." Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(5): 42-48. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.5.42
  7. Yea, Sang-Jun, Jang, Ho and Kim, Suntae. 2019. "Metadata Element Design for Korean Medicine Research Data Management and Re-use." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(2): 223-246. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.2.223
  8. Lee, Mihwa, Lee, Eun-Ju and Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2020. "A Preliminary Study on Extending OAK Metadata for Research Data." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3): 27-51. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.27
  9. Jeon, Bang Jin. 2011. "A Study on the Applying Metaata Standards in Cadastral Information for increasing its Utilization." Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association, 13(1): 81-92.
  10. ANZLIC. 2011, ANZLIC Metadata Profile Guidelines Version 1.2. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 2.]
  11. CodeMeta. 2019. CodeMeta Overview. [online] [cited 2020. 6. 25.]
  12. DCC. 2019. Federal Geographic Data Committee Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 1.]
  13. DCC. 2019. ISO 19115. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 2.]
  14. Desconnets, J. C., Mougenot, I. and Chahdi, H. 2017. "A methodology for effective metadata design in Earth observation. In Developing Metadata Application Profiles." IGI Global, 65-97.
  15. European Commission. 2008. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 of 3 December 2008 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata (Text with EEA relevance) Metadata Implementing Rules Part B. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 2.]
  16. European Forest Institute. 2019. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 26.]
  17. Habermann, T. 2019. "Mapping ISO 19115-1 geographic metadata standards to CodeMeta." PeerJ Computer Science, 5: e174. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.174
  18. Heery, R., and Patel, M. 2000. "Application profiles: mixing and matching metadata schemas." Ariadne, (25).
  19. ISO. [n.d.]. International Organization for Standardization (1 April 2014). "ISO 19115-1:2014 (en)." [online] [cited 2020. 7. 15.]
  20. Li, C. and Sugimoto, S. 2018. "Provenance description of metadata application profiles for long-term maintenance of metadata schemas." Journal of Documentation, 74(1): 36-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2017-0042
  21. Malta, M. C. and Baptista, A. A. 2012. "State of the art on methodologies for the development of a metadata application profile." In Research Conference on Metadata and Semantic Research, 61-73.
  22. Morsy, M. et al. 2017. "Design of a metadata framework for environmental models with an example hydrologic application in HydroShare." Environmental modeling & software, 93: 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.028
  23. NEFIS - Network for a European Forest Information Service. 2019. [online] [cited 2020. 5. 27.]
  24. NOAA Environmental Data Management Wiki. 2010. ISO 19115 Core Elements. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 29.]
  25. Schuck, A. et al. 2006. "A metadata schema for forest information resources." The FBMIS Group, 1: 11-21.
  26. Schuck, Andreas, 2007. Towards a European forest information system, Boston: Brill.
  27. Wikipedia, 2019. PROV (Provenance). [online] [cited 2020. 6. 25.]
  28. Wikipedia. 2019. Directive (European Union). [online] [cited 2020. 7. 2.]