Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Metadata for Digital Preservation Based on PREMIS 3.0

디지털 보존을 위한 PREMIS 3.0 기반 메타데이터에 관한 연구

  • 박희진 (한성대학교 디지털인문정보학트랙)
  • Received : 2020.11.03
  • Accepted : 2020.11.24
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The development of the Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies (PREMIS) aims to preserve practices beyond the limits of the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) conceptual framework; however, the examples and guidelines on connecting each metadata element to the actual data are unclear, making the design of preservation metadata in real digital archives difficult. Hence, this study investigates actual PREMIS 3.0-based preservation metadata management cases, preserves digital resources in various digital archive environments, and derives implications for the implementation and design of preservation metadata. Based on the analysis, the study proposes preservation metadata elements that can be considered when designing preservation metadata for digital archives according to PREMIS 3.0 application profile guidelines.

PREMIS는 OAIS의 개념적 프레임워크의 한계를 넘어 보존 실무에 적용할 수 있도록 개발되었지만, 각 메타데이터 요소들을 실제 데이터와 어떻게 연결시킬 것인지에 대한 사례와 지침이 명확하지 않아 디지털 아카이브에서 실제 보존 메타데이터를 설계하거나 구현하는데 어려움이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 다양한 디지털 아카이브의 환경에서 디지털 자원을 관리하고 보존의 목적으로 활용되고 있는 PREMIS 3.0 기반의 보존 메타데이터 실제 사례들을 조사하고 보존 메타데이터 구현 및 설계를 위한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 분석 결과를 토대로 PREMIS의 응용프로파일 지침에 따라 디지털 아카이브의 보존 메타데이터 설계 시 고려할 수 있는 보존 메타데이터 요소들을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Myeong-Ok & Lee, Sang-Yong (2010). A Study on the Functional Elements for Long-term Preservation of Electronic Records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(2), 101-126.
  2. Korean Association of Archival Management (2009). Understanding of Electronic Record. Seoul:JoeunGulteo.
  3. Lee, Jiyoung & Kim, Hee-Jung (2009). A Study on Metadata Elements for Digital Image Records Management, 40(4), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2009.40.4.049
  4. Lee, Jiyoung (2018). Electronic Records Preservation and Strategies of National Archives of Australia. National Archives of Korea, 45, 30-33.
  5. Lee, Seungmin (2015). Construction of Preservation Metadata Package for Digital Archiving. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.021
  6. National Archives of Korea (2010). Records and archives management metadata research project final report of national standardization. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  7. National Archives of Korea (2016). A study on long-term Preservation Decision Making Support System based on Electronic Records Technology Information. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  8. Park, Ok Nam (2012). A Study on developing preservation metadata based on PREMIS focusing on digital data in National Library of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 83-113 https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.083
  9. Caron, B., Houssaye, J., Ledoux, T., & Reecht. S. (2017). Life and Death of an Information Package: Implementing the Lifecycle in a Multi-Purpose Preservation System. iPRES 2017 14th International Conference on Digital Preservation, Sep 2017, Kyoto, Japan. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://hal-bnf.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01617645/document
  10. Dappert, A., Guenther, R. S., Peyrard (2016). An Introduction to Implementing Digital Preservation Metadata. In Dappert, A., Guenther, R.S., Peyrard, S. (Eds.), Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners - Implementing PREMIS (pp. 11-22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  11. Derrot, S. & Oury, C. (2014). Ebooks: rather electronic or book? Extending legal deposit to ebooks at the Bibliotheque nationale de France. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from http://library.ifla.org/830/1/087-derrot-en.pdf
  12. Garvie, C. Reimagining the Archival Control Model of the National Archives of Australia for the digital age. Archiving Conference, Archiving 2020 Final Program and Proceedings, pp. 101-105(5) https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2020.1.0.101
  13. Library of Congress (2016). PREMIS: Preservation Metadata Maintenance Activity. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/ma.html
  14. National Archives of Australia (2004). The CRS Manual: Registration and description standards for the Commonwealth Record Series (CRS) System. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/manual/index.htm
  15. Peyrard, S., Dappert, A., & Guenther, R. S. (2016). How to Develop an Digital Preservation Metadata Profile: Risk and Requirements Analysis. In Dappert, A., Guenther, R.S., Peyrard, S. (Eds.), Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners - Implementing PREMIS (pp.11-22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  16. PREMIS Editorial Committee (2008). Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata version 2.0. Retrieved November 10, 2020, https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf
  17. PREMIS Editorial Committee (2014). Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata version 3.0, revised November 2014. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
  18. Royal Danish Library (2019). Royal Danish Library's Digital Preservation Policy. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from http://en.statsbiblioteket.dk/national-library-division/digital-preservation.
  19. Saisto, A. (2019). D-ark: A Shared Digital Performance Art Archive with a Modular Metadata Schema. Heritage, 2(1), 976-987. DOI: 10.3390/heritage2010064
  20. Zierau, E. (2019). Preservation of Metadata: A case study of a strategy to ensure technology agnostic metadata preservation. DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/NGY4U