Journal of Energy Engineering (에너지공학)

The Korean Society for Energy (한국에너지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Portfolio matrix analysis for the improvement of R&D productivity in the energy technology sector

에너지기술의 R&D 생산성 제고를 위한 포트폴리오 매트릭스 분석

  • Received : 2020.06.09
  • Accepted : 2020.09.04
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A portfolio matrix analysis was conducted to improve R&D productivity of the government-funded R&D projects in the energy sector. 27 projects (42 detailed technologies) in 2018 were evaluated on a 5-point scale in terms of availability and technology competitiveness, and portfolio matrix analysis was conducted twice. The results of the portfolio matrix analysis could provide the landscape of on-going R&D projects at a time and could be utilized as feedback data to establish development strategies for individual projects, while establishing differentiated management directions to improve R&D productivity in each of the four areas of the portfolio matrix.

에너지 부문의 정부출연금 R&D 예산 지원을 받는 과제들을 대상으로, R&D 생산성을 제고하기 위한 목적으로 포트폴리오 매트릭스 분석을 하였다. 2018년에 27개 프로젝트(42개 세부기술)를 대상으로 활용가능성과 기술경쟁력 측면에서 5점 척도로 평가하였으며, 분석은 2회 실시하였다. 포트폴리오 매트릭스 분석 결과는 진행 중인 다양한 에너지기술 R&D 프로젝트들을 한꺼번에 조망하고, 개별 프로젝트의 발전전략을 수립하는 피드백 자료로 활용되는 한편, 포트폴리오 매트릭스의 4개 영역별로 R&D 생산성을 제고하기 위한 차별화된 관리 방향을 수립하는데 기여할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y. H., et al., 2008, Establishment of investment direction for national R&D projects through portfolio analysis, Science & Technology Policy, Vol. 168, pp. 94-109 (in Korean)
  2. Cho, G. T., et al., 2011, R&D management, Gyeongmunsa, pp. 126-133 (in Korean)
  3. Cooper, R. G., 2016, Winning at new products, Jinsung Books Co., pp. 411-435 (in Korean)
  4. Cooper, R., et al., 2001, Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study, R&D Management, Vol. 31, No. 4.
  5. Dayton, L., 2020, How South Korea made itself a global innovation leader, Nature, Vol. 581, pp. S54-S56 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01466-7
  6. Han, B. J., 2014, Planning for solving problems, Chologbi, pp. 293-297 (in Korean)
  7. IEA, 2020, Energy Technology Perspectives 2020
  8. KIER, 2019, KIER's main projects management handbook for researchers (in Korean)
  9. Kim, S. S., 2019, Achievements and challenges in the science and technology policy, Science and technology debate with the people, pp. 5-12 (in Korean)
  10. Kim, Y. J., et al., 2009, A study on the investment strategy of the IT R&D using portfolio analysis and AHP method, Korean Management Science Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 37-51 (in Korean)
  11. Lee, C. W., 2009, R&D portfolio management techniques, Technology and Management, pp. 46-49 (in Korean)
  12. Lee, K. C., et al., 2009, Application of TPM methodology for evaluation GIS R&D project, The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 152-161 (in Korean)
  13. Lee, S. M., 2018, R&D management system in LG Chem, Conference of performance presentation in the research administration advancement, pp. 193-199 (in Korean)
  14. Park, H. W., et al., 2019, Technology strategy and R&D planning, Hansung University Press, pp. 188-205 (in Korean)
  15. Park, J. H., 2005, Technology portfolio matrix in the global company, Spring Conference of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society & Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 159-162 (in Korean)
  16. Pfitzner M. S., et al., 2011, R&D porfolio management: The case study of a big energy company in Brazil, PICMET, pp. 1-16
  17. Sim, J. Y., et al., 1998, Technology strategies based on portfolio analysis: ETRI case, Conference of Korea Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, pp. 1301-1304 (in Korean)