Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The suggestion for Biotope Types and Field Datasheet based on Habitat Ecological Characteristics by German Policy Analysis

독일 정책 분석을 통한 서식지 생태특성 기반 비오톱 유형 분류 및 조사표 제안

  • Kim, Nam-Shin (Division of Ecological Survey Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Jung, Song-Hie (Gwangneung Forest Conservation Center, National Arboretum) ;
  • Lim, Chi-Hong (Division of Ecological Survey Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Choi, Chul-Hyun (Division of Ecological Survey Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Cha, Jin-Yeol (Division of Ecological Survey Research, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 김남신 (국립생태원 생태조사연구실) ;
  • 정성희 (국립수목원 광릉숲보전센터) ;
  • 임치홍 (국립생태원 생태조사연구실) ;
  • 최철현 (국립생태원 생태조사연구실) ;
  • 차진열 (국립생태원 생태조사연구실)
  • Received : 2020.09.07
  • Accepted : 2020.10.20
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to propose biotope field datasheet and biotope type classification based on habitat-based by analyzing the German biotope system. The German system began in 1976 and has established a habitat-based national biotope classification system. On the other hand, Korea institutionalized in 2018 to build a classification system based on land use and land cover, which is a classification system that does not fully reflect ecosystem in Korea. Germany operates 44 biotope classification systems and 40 biotope field datasheet. Korea uses a single biotope field datasheet regardless of the biotope type. This classification system may not reflect the characteristics of Korea's biotope ecological habitat. The biotope classification system of Korea was proposed by dividing it into five categories: mountain ecology, freshwater ecology, land ecology, coastal ecology, and development area to reflect ecosystem habitat. The biotope type was designed as a system of large-classification-middle-small classification and subdivided into medium-classification and subdivided in each biotope system. The major classifications were classified into 44 categories according to the mountainous biotope(11), freshwater biotope(8), terrestrial biotope (12), coastal biotope(6), and development biotope(7). Unlike Germany, Korea's biotope field datasheet was proposed in five ways according to the classification of major ecosystem types. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the policy suggestion and the utilization of ecosystem conservation because the biotope classification system is classified to reflect the characteristics of ecosystem habitats.

Keywords

References

  1. BNatschG.2019. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bnatschg_2009/
  2. ChepKemoi J. 2017. What Is The Difference Between A Biotope And A Habitat? https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-the-difference-between-a-biotope-and-a-habitat.html.
  3. Choi IK and Lee EH. 2007. A study on the classification of biotope type in Germany. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture.35(5): 73-81.
  4. Choi IK.Ahn GY and Lee EH. 2007. A comparative study of biotope mapping between Korea and Germany. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology.21(6): 565-575.
  5. Choi IK.Oh CH and Lee EH. 2008. The suggestion for classification of biotope type for nationwide application. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology.22(6): 666-679.
  6. Choi JW. 2010. Comparisons of classification system of biotope type in major Korean cities. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 24(1): 78-86.
  7. Choi JW.2009. Development of classification and evaluation process of biotope type by suitable regional characteristics in Seoul metropolitan area, Korea.Procceding Korean Society of Environment and Ecology. 1: 138-141.
  8. Choi SH. 2008. Biotope mapping and evaluation in Gangseo-Gu of Busan metropolitan city. The Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 11(3); 92-106.
  9. Drachenfels O.2012.Biotoptypen als erfassungs-und bewertungseinheiten von naturschutz und landschaftsplanung. Vorschlage fur eine notwendige Standardisierung. Natur und Landschaft, 44, 357-363.
  10. EU Habitats Directive.2019. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm
  11. Federal government BMU.2017.https://www.bfn.de/Land
  12. Finck P.Heinze S.Raths U.Riecken U . Ssymank. A. 2017. Rote liste der gefahrdeten biotoptypen Deutschlands: dritte fortgeschriebene fassung. Bundesamt fur Naturschutz.
  13. Illies J and Botosaneanu L.1963. Problemes et methodes de la classification et de la zonation ecologique des eaux courantes, considerees surtout du point de vue faunistique: Avec 18 figures dans le texte et en supplement. Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Mitteilungen. 12(1): 1-57.
  14. Lee MC. 1996. A conceptual study of biotope mapping in the city. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 31(6): 197-211.
  15. Leser H. 1991. Landscape ecologie. UTB 521, Eugen UlmerGmbh & Co., Stuttgart.
  16. LNatSchG NRW. 2019.https://recht.nrw.de/lmi/ owa/br_text_anzeigen?v_id=1120050120105539311
  17. Ministry of Environment. 2019a. The Natural Environment Conservation Act.
  18. Ministry of Environment. 2019b. Guidelines for preparing urban ecological status maps.
  19. Ministry of Environment and National Institue of Ecology. 2019. A Case Study on the System and Operation of the Natural Environment Survey in Germany.
  20. Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2019. http://methoden.naturschutzinformationen.nrw.de/methoden/de/einleitung
  21. Oh CH. 2001. Application of biotope map for management of Seoul urban ecosystem, Master's degree, University of Seoul.
  22. Ra JH. 1999. A study on the urban biotope classification and analysis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 13(2): 129-142.
  23. Riecken, U., Finck, P., Raths, U., Schroder, E., and Ssymank, A. 2003. Standard-Biotoptypenliste fur Deutschland. Bundesamt fur Naturschutz.
  24. Stoddart, D.R., 1992. Biogeography of the Tropical Pacific. Pacific Science, 46(2): 276-293.
  25. Sukopp H and Weiler S. 1988. Biotop mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 15: 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90015-1
  26. Tricart J and KiewietdeJonge C. 1992. Ecogeography and rural management - a contribution to the international geosphere-biosphere programme; John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

Cited by

  1. 도시계획 수립에 있어 도시생태현황지도 활용방안 연구 - 용도지역과 시가화예정용지를 중심으로 - vol.24, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2021.24.4.31