Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the consumption pattern of delivery food according to food-related lifestyle

식생활라이프스타일에 따른 배달음식의 소비성향 분석

  • Received : 2020.08.07
  • Accepted : 2020.09.04
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to segment the delivery food market and to develop customized products and services. Methods: This study analyzed 636 responses collected from customers who ordered delivery food. Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS program (ver. 25.0) for frequency analysis, χ2-test, one-way analysis of variance, factor analysis, and cluster analysis. Results: Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis (safety-orientation, convenience-orientation, taste-orientation, and economy-orientation) to explain the consumers' food-related lifestyles. The results of cluster analysis indicated that the 'low-interest group', 'convenience and economy-oriented group', and 'gourmet and economy-oriented group' should be regarded as the target segments. Characteristic analysis of each cluster showed that lowinterest group had higher rates of married (67.1%) and living with family (85.4%) than other clusters. The convenience and the economy-oriented group had higher rates of living alone (28.9%) than others. The gourmet and the economy-oriented group had a higher percentage of unmarried (62.0%) than the others. In addition, the average age of convenience and economy-oriented group (32.3 years) and gourmet and economy-oriented group (32.5 years) were significantly lower than the safety seeker (40.0 years) (p < 0.001). Difference analysis of the consumption practice according to the cluster, revealed significant differences in the order frequency (p < 0.001), main day to order (p < 0.05), source of information about delivery food (p < 0.001), order method (p < 0.001), and co-consumer (p < 0.01). In addition, the convenience and the economy-oriented group had significantly higher overall satisfaction than the others (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings suggest that customer segmentation based on a food-related lifestyle can be used to build a successful marketing strategy. Therefore, restaurant managers and delivery platform operators should consider developing products and services according to the segmentation to maximize customer satisfaction.

배달음식 소비시장을 세분화하여 고객 성향 맞춤형 제품과 서비스 개발을 위한 기초자료로 활용하고자 배달음식 이용 경험이 있는 성인남녀 총 636명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 조사대상자의 식생활라이프스타일 평가항목에 대한 요인분석 결과 안전지향, 편의지향, 맛지향, 경제지향 요인이 도출되었고 요인분석 결과를 토대로 군집분석을 실시한 결과 조사대상 고객을 식생활 저관심군, 편의·경제 추구군, 미식·경제 추구군으로 분류하였다. 군집에 따른 조사대상자의 일반 특성에 대한 차이분석 결과 연령 (p < 0.001), 결혼 여부 (p < 0.001), 가족 유형 (p < 0.01), 주거 형태 (p < 0.05) 에서 유의적인 차이가 있었다. 식생활 저관심군은 기혼 (67.1%), 가족과 함께 거주하는 비율 (85.4%), 아파트에 거주하는 비율 (74.2%)이 다른 군집에 비해 높았고 편의·경제 추구군은 1인 가구 비율 (28.9%)이, 미식·경제 추구군은 미혼의 비율 (62.0%)이 다른 군집에 비해 높았다. 조사대상자의 연령은 편의·경제 추구군(32.3세)과 미식·경제 추구군 (32.5세)에 비해 식생활 저관심군 (40.0세)이 유의적으로 높았다(p < 0.001). 식생활라이프스타일 군집에 따른 배달음식 소비 실태에 대한 차이 분석 결과 주문횟수 (p < 0.001), 주로 주문하는 요일 (p < 0.05), 배달음식의 정보 습득 경로 (p < 0.001), 주문 방법 (p < 0.001), 같이 섭취하는 사람 (p < 0.01)에서 군집 간에 유의적인 차이가 있었으며, 편의·경제 추구군은 배달음식 주문횟수 (p < 0.001)와 배달음식에 대한 전체적인 만족도 (p < 0.001)에서 식생활 저관심군과 미식·경제 추구군에 비해 유의적으로 높았다. 따라서 음식점 경영자와 배달 플랫폼 업체는 배달음식 고객의 만족도를 극대화하기 위해서 고객의 식생활 라이프스타일 특성을 고려한 제품과 서비스를 개발하고 배달음식의 품질 향상을 위해 지속적으로 노력해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon J, Kim S, Park E, Song J. A study on the number of domestic food delivery services. Korean J Appl Stat 2015; 28(5): 977-990. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2015.28.5.977
  2. Park SH, Sin IS. The effect of food delivery service quality on customer satisfaction, perceived emotion, and intension to reuse. J Distrib Manag Res 2018; 21(4): 5-13. https://doi.org/10.17961/jdmr.21.4.201808.5
  3. Song YE, Jeon SH, Jeon MS. The effect of mobile food delivery application usage factors on customer satisfaction and intention to reuse. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2017; 23(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.20878/CSHR.2017.23.1.005
  4. Mirae Asset. The age of delivery: the rise of the new distribution. Seoul: Mirae Asset; 2018.
  5. Do KH. Development of food O2O service with foodtech. Ind Internet Issue Rep 2015; 11: 3-16.
  6. Park HG. Foodtech? Seoul: Korean Marketing Association; 2016.
  7. Ministry of Agriculture Food Service Companies [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 30]. Available from: https://bit.ly/33vIzQh.
  8. Kim H, Kim M. Analysis of the consumption behaviors and factors determining the use of delivery or take-out foods. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2019; 29(3): 168-179. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.6.29.3.168
  9. Ko SH. Research on the consumer's delivery service quality perception and satisfaction in foodservice industry based on the types of food-related lifestyle. J Korea Contents Assoc 2014; 14(8): 406-415. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.406
  10. Keeble M, Adams J, Sacks G, Vanderlee L, White CM, Hammond D, et al. Use of online food delivery services to order food prepared away-from-home and associated sociodemographic characteristics: a cross-sectional, multi-country analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(14): 5190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145190
  11. Kim JY, GO S. Consumer characteristics and food delivery-takeout behaviors at restaurants. Foodserv Ind J 2017; 13(3): 7-21.
  12. Choi JH. The study on using delivery application belief, customer satisfaction and purchase intention by food related lifestyle of undergraduate students. Foodserv Ind J 2019; 15(2): 195-210. https://doi.org/10.22509/kfsa.2019.15.2.014
  13. Yoo DK. A study on developing better franchise delivery food's service quality which influences on customers' emotional response and franchise brand equity. Foodserv Ind J 2017; 13(4): 195-206. https://doi.org/10.22509/kfsa.2017.13.4.012
  14. Seo SK. A study on usage pattern of restaurant searching websites and the importance of contents by the food-related lifestyle [dissertation]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University; 2010.
  15. Yang DH. A study on consumer eating out purchases in accordance with the food lifestyle - focusing on the moderating effects of consumer culture. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2016; 22(5): 13-24. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2016.22.5.002002002
  16. Kim NH. The effects of the dietary lifestyle and demographic characteristics on the brand image of restaurants with nutritional labeling. J Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc 2019; 20(6): 548-556. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.6.548
  17. Ko JY, Hong SS, Yoo E. The study of relation between life style of dining-out consumers and menu selection attributes in Korean restaurants. J Tourism Leis Res 2013; 25(2): 155-175.
  18. Jang BJ. The effect of well-being awareness on lifestyle and foodservice consumption propensity: focusing on food & beverage customers in super deluxe hotels in Busan. J Tourism Leis Res 2018; 30(7): 321-337. https://doi.org/10.31336/jtlr.2018.07.30.7.321
  19. Sohn IN, Kim YS. Research on the dining-out behavior of Cheong-Ju undergraduates by food-related lifestyle. J Korea Contents Assoc 2008; 8(11): 347-355. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2008.8.11.347
  20. Lee JH. A study on obesity index and attributes of selecting places to eat out by food-related lifestyle types - focusing on Pusan university students. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2012; 18(4): 47-58.
  21. Kim YA, Lee BC, Youn HW. A study on single people's satisfaction of convenience foods and repurchase intention according to food-related lifestyle. J Tourism Leis Res 2015; 27(1): 433-452.
  22. Bae HJ, Chae MJ, Ryu K. Consumer behaviors towards ready-to-eat foods based on food-related lifestyles in Korea. Nutr Res Pract 2010; 4(4): 332-338. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2010.4.4.332
  23. Kim IH. Quality evaluation and utilization of nutrition information according to the dietary lifestyle of information users [dissertation]. Daegu: Daegu University; 2019.
  24. Kim KS. Analysis of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Company; 2007.
  25. Shinhan Investment. The age of delivery. Seoul: Shinhan Investment; 2014.
  26. Macromill Embrain. Perception survey on delivery food and delivery application. Seoul: Macromill Embrain; 2015.
  27. Jin H. For the relation between safety concern for food in restaurants or purchased outside and frequency of eating home food: focused on household type. J Consum Policy Stud 2018; 49(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15723/JCPS.49.1.201804.1
  28. Kwon HJ. The relationship of physical fitness and obesity factors among obesity level of elementary student. J Korean Soc Study Phys Educ 2010; 15(1): 125-140.
  29. Stephens J, Miller H, Militello L. Food delivery apps and the negative health impacts for Americans. Front Nutr 2020; 7: 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00014
  30. Suh Y, Lee EK, Chung YJ. Comparison of nutritional status by energy level of night snack in Korean adults: using the data from 2005 Korean national health and nutrition examination survey. Korean J Nutr 2012; 45(5): 479-488. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2012.45.5.479
  31. Jun YS, Choi MK, Bae YJ. Night eating and nutrient intake status according to residence type in university students. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2015; 44(2): 216-225. https://doi.org/10.3746/JKFN.2015.44.2.216
  32. Hernandez E, Kim M, Kim WG, Yoon J. Nutritional aspects of night eating and its association with weight status among Korean adolescents. Nutr Res Pract 2016; 10(4): 448-455. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2016.10.4.448
  33. Na SK, Cheon SH, Choi YJ, Lee HJ, Roh YK, Choi MK. Relationship between abdominal obesity and proportion of supper and late-night meals. Korean J Obes 2016; 25(2): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7570/kjo.2016.25.2.92
  34. Ko YT. 95% of Koreans Use Smartphones…Which Country has the Highest Penetration Rate? [Internet]. Seoul: KBS; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 30]. Available from: https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4135732.
  35. Moon YE, Wang Q. A study on the effect of consumption trends and sociality in take-away applications on consumer satisfaction and continuance intention. J Internet Elec Commer Res 2019; 19(4): 121-143. https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2019.08.19.4.121
  36. Lu Y, Ma M, Wang H, Wang D, Chen C, Jing Q, et al. An outbreak of norovirus-related acute gastroenteritis associated with delivery food in Guangzhou, southern China. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8117-y
  37. Korea Consumer Agency. Monitoring of microbial changes in food by temperature control in retail stores. Eumseong: Korea Consumer Agency; 2007.
  38. Lim ES, Koo OK. Contamination of green vegetable juice by E. coli O157:H7 during storage. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2015; 47(4): 446-451. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.4.446
  39. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Delivery Restaurant Hygiene Level I will Check Myself [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_99/view.do?seq=39574.
  40. Heo SJ, Bae HJ. A survey on customers' perception of a hygiene grade certification system for restaurants. J Nutr Health 2020; 53(2): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.2.203
  41. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. A survey on the food trend in Korea. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2019.
  42. Chen Y, Xie J. Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Manage Sci 2008; 54(3): 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810
  43. Lee YH, editor. A change in Korean dietary life through the food trend. Proceedings of the 54th East Asian Soc Dietary Life conference; 2018 Oct 20; Leeds, UK. Seoul: The East Asian Society of Dietary Life; 2018.

Cited by

  1. Effect Analysis on the Expenditure of Delivery and Takeout Food vol.32, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2021.32.1.113
  2. Studies of Selection Attributes for Lunch Boxes (Dosirak) Using Conjoint Analysis among Single Men vol.50, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2021.50.8.884